본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

복음서의 장르는 무엇인가?

What is the Genre of the Gospels?

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

To know the basic characteristic of a text, we need to know the genre of the text. The genre of the four Gospels has been disputed since the 18th century. Most scholars in the nineteenth century regarded the four formdeveloped who Gospels biographies. However, scholars as criticism in the twentieth century insisted that the Gospels be ‘something peculiar in themselves, sui generis’. In 1992, Burridge challenged this view. Burridge analyzed the forms andcontentsof ancient biographies and compared them with the four Gospels. He argued that the characteristics of the biographies were also observed in the four Gospels. The study of Burridge has been supported by many scholars. However, despite the study of Burridge the debate on the genre of the Gospels is not ended. Because, as Burridge claimed, ancient biographies had diverse and floating forms and contents. For example, there were Peripatetic biographies that dealt with the lives of generals and and written with public performance in mind, politicians were Alexandrian’s biographies that dealt with the lives of scholars, poets and artists, Encomium type that praised the public achievements of the main characters, Popular-novelistic type that presented the lives of the main characters to the public like a novel. This paper examines whether the Gospels belonged to the ancient biographies and, if they did, which sub-genre they belonged to. The four gospels does not belong to any of the sub-genres presented above. The four Gospels were similar to the Aretalogy. This is a biography of Divine Man, who has become a man of divine nature. There were no biography of the divine man before the Gospel, but since the second century, the biographies of various philosophers have been written in this form. Thus the Gospel is one of the Aretalogy.

Abstract

To know the basic characteristic of a text, we need to know the genre of the text. The genre of the four Gospels has been disputed since the 18th century. Most scholars in the nineteenth century regarded the four formdeveloped who Gospels biographies. However, scholars as criticism in the twentieth century insisted that the Gospels be ‘something peculiar in themselves, sui generis’. In 1992, Burridge challenged this view. Burridge analyzed the forms andcontentsof ancient biographies and compared them with the four Gospels. He argued that the characteristics of the biographies were also observed in the four Gospels. The study of Burridge has been supported by many scholars. However, despite the study of Burridge the debate on the genre of the Gospels is not ended. Because, as Burridge claimed, ancient biographies had diverse and floating forms and contents. For example, there were Peripatetic biographies that dealt with the lives of generals and and written with public performance in mind, politicians were Alexandrian’s biographies that dealt with the lives of scholars, poets and artists, Encomium type that praised the public achievements of the main characters, Popular-novelistic type that presented the lives of the main characters to the public like a novel. This paper examines whether the Gospels belonged to the ancient biographies and, if they did, which sub-genre they belonged to. The four gospels does not belong to any of the sub-genres presented above. The four Gospels were similar to the Aretalogy. This is a biography of Divine Man, who has become a man of divine nature. There were no biography of the divine man before the Gospel, but since the second century, the biographies of various philosophers have been written in this form. Thus the Gospel is one of the Aretalogy.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 게르트 타이쎈, "역사적 예수: 예수의 역사적 삶에 대한 총체적 연구" (2001), 다산 글방
  2. 귄터 스템베르거, "미드라쉬 입문" (2008), 바오로 딸
  3. 김경현, "콘스탄티누스 황제와 기독교" (2017), 세창
  4. 에르네스트 르낭, "예수의 삶" (1999), UUP
  5. Aaron, Daniel, "Studies in Biography" (1958), Harvard University Press
  6. Adams, Sean A, "The Genre of Acts and Collected Biography" (2013), Cambridge University Press
  7. Aletti, Jean-Noël, "The Birth of the Gospels as Biographies" (2017), Gregorian Univ Press
  8. Blackburn, Barry, "Theios Anēr and the Markan Miracle Traditions:A Critique of the Theios Anēr" (1992), J. C. B. Mohr
  9. Bultmann, Rudolf, "The History of the Synoptic Tradition" (1963), Basil Blackwell
  10. Burridge, Richard A, "What Are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography" (1992), Cambridge University Press
  11. Copan, Paul, "Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up?" (1988), Baker Books
  12. Downing, F. G, "Cynics and Christian Origins" (1992), T&T
  13. Evans, Craig A, "Encyclopedia of the Historical Jesus" (2008), Routledge
  14. Hadas, Moses, "Heroes and Gods:Spiritual Biographies in Antiquity" (1965), Routledge
  15. Holderness, Graham, "Re-Writing Jesus:Christ in 20th-Century Fiction and Film" (2014), Bloomsbury Publishing
  16. Leo, Friedrich, "Die Griechisch-Römische Biographie Nach Ihrer Literarischen Form" (1901), Teubner
  17. MacDonald, Deven K, "Allegiance, Opposition, and Misunderstanding:A Narrative Critical Approach to Mark’s Christology" (2018), Pickwick Publications
  18. Marshall, I. H, "New Testament Interpretation: Essays on Principles and Methods" (1977), Paternoster

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)