Qualitative Indicator Development of National Award for Innovation Leading Company
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study focuses on the development of simple qualitative indicators for evaluating and selecting innovation leading companies that challenge National Award. Another purpose of this study is to complement the aspect in which the innovative or value of the companies' products, technologies, and services is only quantitatively evaluated. Existing evaluation indicators of national award have too many evaluation items and were not suitable for innovation-based company evaluation. The research approach is to select category for developing qualitative indicators based on previous studies and TF discussion. From the input-process-output-outcome point of view, we have set up an indicator system as a series of flows. Finally, five categories such as creativity, system excellence, customer value, performance, and ripple effects are selected as qualitative indicator. For these selected indicators, conceptual definitions and the main points of evaluation are described. And the system level evaluation and the ADLI approach are presented for reference. The appendix also includes examples of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of real companies using these indicators. However, this study implies the possibility that the evaluation results may vary depending on the level and perspective of the evaluator. We hoped that detailed research on candidate indicators that can be used as qualitative indicators and research on the development of mixed indicators(qualitative and quantitative) will continue in the future.
Abstract
This study focuses on the development of simple qualitative indicators for evaluating and selecting innovation leading companies that challenge National Award. Another purpose of this study is to complement the aspect in which the innovative or value of the companies' products, technologies, and services is only quantitatively evaluated. Existing evaluation indicators of national award have too many evaluation items and were not suitable for innovation-based company evaluation. The research approach is to select category for developing qualitative indicators based on previous studies and TF discussion. From the input-process-output-outcome point of view, we have set up an indicator system as a series of flows. Finally, five categories such as creativity, system excellence, customer value, performance, and ripple effects are selected as qualitative indicator. For these selected indicators, conceptual definitions and the main points of evaluation are described. And the system level evaluation and the ADLI approach are presented for reference. The appendix also includes examples of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of real companies using these indicators. However, this study implies the possibility that the evaluation results may vary depending on the level and perspective of the evaluator. We hoped that detailed research on candidate indicators that can be used as qualitative indicators and research on the development of mixed indicators(qualitative and quantitative) will continue in the future.
참고문헌 (19)
- S. H. Yoon, "A Study on the causal relationship between the competitiveness factor of domestic companies using the Quality Management Award Criteria", SJIS, 7(2), pp.32~51 (2010)
- 박동준, "품질경쟁력 우수기업의 특성분석", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 42(3), pp.95~108 (2019), 한국산업경영시스템학회[DOI]
- 이형석, "“품질경쟁력 우수기업”수상기업의 재무성과에 관한 연구: 연도의 조절효과를 중심으로", 품질경영학회지, 44(3), pp.617~638 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Y. T. Park, "Criteria for Quality Award and Measurement of Management Quality", J. of Korean Society for Quality Management, 26(2), pp.86~92 (1998)
- Korea Standards Association, "Korea National Quality Award Guidebook" (2019)
- Korea Productivity Center, "Korea Productivity Award Guidebook" (2019)
- Korea Small Business Institute, "A Study on the Revision of Inno-Biz's System and Evaluation Indicators" (2017)
- Corporate Growth Promotion Performance Evaluation Indicator R&D Final Report, "Ministry of Knowledge Economy", 70~71 (2013)
- 장은영, "R&D조직의 창의적 팀 특성이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향 : 창의적 풍토의 매개효과", 한국경영과학회지, 41(4), pp.75~93 (2016), 한국경영과학회[DOI]
- 김광두, "혁신활동이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 기술혁신학회지, 14(2), pp.373~404 (2011), 한국기술혁신학회
- 박재민, "기업의 혁신 활동이 기업성과에 미치는 영향", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 11(3), pp.339~350 (2011), 한국콘텐츠학회
- S. W. Hong, "The Effect of Process Maturity on the Performance of Industrial R&D Projects", IE interfaces, 16(3), pp.362~374 (2003)
- 신경식, "R&D 프로세스 성숙도가 제품개발 성과에 미치는 영향: R&D 프로젝트 성과의 매개효과를 중심으로", 정보처리학회논문지. 컴퓨터 및 통신시스템, 7(7), pp.165~174 (2018), 한국정보처리학회[DOI]
- 주재훈, "고객가치, 공급사슬통합 그리고 기업성과 간의 관계에 대한 연구", 정보시스템연구, 21(2), pp.27~44 (2012), 한국정보시스템학회[DOI]
- 노형진, "제조기업의 핵심역량 및 가치혁신전략이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 17(4), pp.155~161 (2012), 한국컴퓨터정보학회[DOI]
- 류두진, "정부기관의 중소기업 포상이 나아가야할 방향: 기업 가치에 미치는 영향을 중심으로", 한국증권학회지, 43(1), pp.47~69 (2014), 한국증권학회
- 조용철, "유기성 폐기물 에너지화 시설 확대의 경제적 파급효과 분석", 한국혁신학회지, 10(2), pp.159~174 (2015), 한국혁신학회
- 김상수, "창조경영 수준 진단 시스템 개발에 관한 연구", 지식경영연구, 14(2), pp.1~24 (2013), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
- 이관석, "한국 국가품질상 개선방안에 관한 연구: 아시아 국가들과의 비교를 중심으로", 품질경영학회지, 38(2), pp.202~211 (2010), 한국품질경영학회