본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Comparative Analysis of the Arrest of Ship Procedures in Nigeria and Korea: The Need for a Paradigm Change

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Nigeria and Korea largely represent cargo and shipowners’ interests, respectively. Hence, the regime of the arrest of a ship is germane in their respective maritime industries. Though both countries have not domesticated either of the ship arrest conventions, their existing admiralty or civil procedure laws and rules of court have always been triggered where matters require arresting vessels. This research comparatively analyses the arrest of ship procedures in Nigeria and Korea with a view to recommending measures to introduce effective and liberal arrest procedures in both countries. The paper argues that whereas Korea should include a bareboat charter in its arrest regime, Nigeria needs an efficient civil justice system to enhance its ship arrest framework. It is further suggested that both jurisdictions should consider introducing associated ship arrest, accept the Protection and Indemnity Club letter of undertaking as a guarantee for the release of the arrested ships, and introduce balanced wrongful arrest models in their jurisdictions. Consequently, this paper submits that though it is expedient for both countries to domesticate one of the ship arrest conventions, the focus should be on amending the local legislation and rules of court to introduce liberal arrest of ship procedures in both jurisdictions.

Abstract

Nigeria and Korea largely represent cargo and shipowners’ interests, respectively. Hence, the regime of the arrest of a ship is germane in their respective maritime industries. Though both countries have not domesticated either of the ship arrest conventions, their existing admiralty or civil procedure laws and rules of court have always been triggered where matters require arresting vessels. This research comparatively analyses the arrest of ship procedures in Nigeria and Korea with a view to recommending measures to introduce effective and liberal arrest procedures in both countries. The paper argues that whereas Korea should include a bareboat charter in its arrest regime, Nigeria needs an efficient civil justice system to enhance its ship arrest framework. It is further suggested that both jurisdictions should consider introducing associated ship arrest, accept the Protection and Indemnity Club letter of undertaking as a guarantee for the release of the arrested ships, and introduce balanced wrongful arrest models in their jurisdictions. Consequently, this paper submits that though it is expedient for both countries to domesticate one of the ship arrest conventions, the focus should be on amending the local legislation and rules of court to introduce liberal arrest of ship procedures in both jurisdictions.

참고문헌 (76)

  1. "Safety and Shipping Review 2018: an Annual Review of Trends and Developments in Shipping Losses and Safety" (2018)[URL]
  2. "Shipping and World Trade"[URL]
  3. Gbadebo A. Olagungu, "Rethinking the Administration of Justice: Essays in Honour of Hon. Justice Abdullahi Mustapha, OFR , FCI ARB (RTD )", pp.313~ (2011)
  4. Harsh Pratap, "India is a Growing ‘Arrest’ Jurisdiction", Maritime and Transport Law News, 18~ (2012)
  5. "Polar Shipping v. Oriental Shipping Corp., 680 F.2d 627, 637 (9th Cir. 1982)", ~ (1982)
  6. FCA 1191, 1203-1204 (Austl.), , 2004
  7. "International Perspectives on Admiralty Procedures 1 (Oct. 1-3, 2003) (addresses before the 30th Maritime Law Association of Australia and New Zealand (MLAANZ) Conference)"[URL]
  8. Jimmy Ng, "The Different Approaches to Recent Developments in Chinese and US Ship Arrest Laws", Electronic J. of Comparative L., 9(3) (2005)
  9. "Nigeria Economic Outlook: Top 10 Themes for 2019" (2019)[URL]
  10. Clement P. Etebong, "Demography in Nigeria: Problems and Prospects", Biostatistics & Biometrics Open Acc . J., 5(1), pp.25~30 (2018)
  11. "Nigeria Economic Alert: Nigeria’s Economic Recovery Continues Albeit at a Slower Pace" (2018)[URL]
  12. Vija ya Ramac handran, "The New Economy of Africa : Opportunities for Nigeria’s Emerging Technology Sector", pp.1~42 (2019)
  13. Kalu K. Anele, "A Study of the Role of Seafarers in Combating Piracy off Nigeria", WMU J. of Marit. Aff (2016)
  14. "Cargo Throughput at Nigerian Ports(Excl. Crude oil Terminals) - Classified by Type of Cargo: 2007- March, 2019"[URL]
  15. "2018 Annual Statistical Bulletin (NNPC ASB 2018-1st Ed.)"[URL]
  16. Thomas J. Schoenbaum, "Admiralty and Maritime Law", pp.895~ (2012)
  17. Alphonsus O. Njoku, "Oil Pipelines Vandalism and its Effects on the Socio-Economic Development in Nigerian Society", Int’l J. of Multidisciplinary Aca d. Res, 4(4), pp.47~ (2016)
  18. Jonna Pauli, "Hanjin shipping: slow-steaming into bankruptcy, causes and effects", Master, pp.2017
  19. "Exporting to Korea – market overview, International Trade Administration" (2018)[URL]
  20. Shang Doe Shim, "Korea in shipping and shipping in Korea", Asia Bulletin, 8, pp.8~ (2016)
  21. UN CTAD, "Rev. of Maritime Transport", 37~ (2019)
  22. WTO, "World Trade Statistica l Rev", 45~47 (2018)
  23. "Arrest of vessels in Korea"[URL]
  24. Dong-Hee Suh, "Ship arrest in Korea, in Ship Arrest in Prac tice", pp.174~ (2014)
  25. "Hanjin’s collapse has cost the Korean economy $2.6bnl" (2017)[URL]
  26. Robert Thomas, "The collapse of Hanjin Shipping: an English lawyer’s perspective", International Corporate Rescue, 13(6), pp.378~ (2016)
  27. "Hanjin Rome sold by the Singapore courts" (2017)[URL]
  28. "Hanjin insolvency: what to expect from the fallout" (2016)[URL]
  29. "Safety and shipping review 2017: an annual review of trends and developments in shipping losses and safety" (2017)[URL]
  30. "The Gulf of Guinea and its strategic center point: how Nigeria will bridge American and African cooperation" (2009)[URL]
  31. Kendall Tan, "Key developments in Singapore ship arrest laws: a practitioner’s perspective", The Turkey Com. L. Rev, 1(3), pp.253~ (2015)
  32. Hilton Staniland, "Theory versus policy in the reform of admiralty jurisdiction", Int’l J. of Priv. L., 6(4), pp.418~ (2013)
  33. Soomintr Sooksripaisarnkit, "Recent Admiralty Decisions in Hong Kong - Are the Courts Ready to Deviate from their English Predecessors?", Australia and New Zealand Maritime L. J., 30, pp.134~ (2016)
  34. "A Quick Overview of Ship Arrest in some Popular Jurisdictions" (2016)[URL]
  35. "Arrest and detention"[URL]
  36. Omar M. Faraj, "The Arrest of Ships: Comprehensive View on the English Law", Master, pp.2012
  37. Stanley O. Okoli, "Arrest of Ships: Impact of the Law on Maritime Claimants", Master, pp.2010
  38. Simon Baughen, "Shipping Law", pp.396~ (2004)
  39. Siril S. Visnes, "Arrest of Ships in Norway and South Africa-A Comparison", Master’s, pp.2005
  40. "Ocean Law New Zealand"[URL]
  41. Francesco Berlingieri, "Berlingieri on Arrest of Ships: A Commentary on the 1952 and 1999 Arrest Conventions" (2006)
  42. Choon-Won Lee, "Korea, in International Comparative Lega l Guide to: Shipping Law 2019", pp.158~ (2019)
  43. In-Hyeon Kim, "Wrongful arrest in South Korea", Comité Maritime International Conference, pp.2~ (2016)
  44. Byung-Suk Chung, "Ship arrest in Korea, Ship Arrests in Practice", pp.237~ (2018)
  45. "Maritime liens under Korean law"[URL]
  46. George Rutherglen, "The Contemporary Justification for Maritime Arrest and Attachment", Wm. & Mary L. Rev, 30, pp.541~ (1989)
  47. William Tetley, "Arrest, Attachment, and Related Maritime Law Procedures", Tul. L. Rev., 73, pp.1985~ (1999)
  48. Robert W. Lynn, "A Comment on the New International Convention on Arrest of Ships", U. Miami L. Rev, 55, pp.453~ (2001)
  49. Lawrence Fubara Anga, "Ship arrest in Nigeria, Ship Arrests in Prac tice", pp.298~ (2018)
  50. "U. N. Convention on the Law of the Sea art. 3, Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397", ~ (1982)
  51. Omana George, "Admiralty Jurisdiction and Ship Arrest in India", Int’l J. of Current Res, 7(7), pp.18034~ (2015)
  52. Eun Young Shin, "Piercing of the corporate veil in Korea: case commentary", J. of Korean L., 9, pp.27~ (2009)
  53. Kalu Kingsley Anele, "Rethinking the arrest of ship regime in Nigeria", Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 45, pp.1~ (2019)[DOI]
  54. Matthew Harvey, "Arresting Surrogate Ships- Who is an Owner", ML AANZ J., 18, pp.73~ (2004)
  55. "Surrogate Ship Arrest" (2010)[URL]
  56. Henri R. Najjar, "Ship Arrest in Practice", pp.113~ (2014)
  57. Phutita Luksilakul, "Arrest of Associated Ship: the Possibility to Apply South African Approach to Thai Law", Master, pp.2014
  58. Malcolm J.D. Wallis, "The Associated Ship and South African Admiralty Jurisdiction", Doctor, pp.2010
  59. "Korea: Shipping Laws and Regulations" (2020)[URL]
  60. 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 249 at 253, , 1999
  61. For further details on the advantages of P&I letter of undertaking, see generally, Paul Myburgh, P & I Club Letters of Understanding and admiralty arrest, "Timothy Walker J.", NUS Centre, 1~21, pp.NUS Centre for Maritime Law, Working Paper No. 18 (2018), 06
  62. Eleni Melekou, "The P&I Club letters of undertaking as a modern form of security for the release of arrested ship", pp.2016
  63. "Acceptability of Club Letters in Nigeria"[URL]
  64. "Liability for wrongful arrest of ships"[URL]
  65. Andrew Rigden Green, "Getting the Deal Through: Shipping 2019", pp.111~ (2018)
  66. Kashimana Tsumba, "International Comparative Lega l Guide to: Shipping Law 2019", pp.185~ (2019)
  67. Jong-Ku Kang, "The Shipping Law Review", pp.305~ (2019)
  68. , 2014Ga-Hab36288, May 8, 2015, , 2015
  69. , 2016La308, Feb. 23, 2017, , 2017
  70. , 2019
  71. "The fallout from Res Cogitans and expected changes to bunker supply contracts, Norton Rose Fulbright" (2016)[URL]
  72. Carlo Corcione, "Bring the vessel to court: the unique feature of the action in rem in the admiralty law proceedings", Int’l Rev. of L., 7, pp.1~ (2013)
  73. Allen, Sylvie Elizabeth, "Navigating the murky waters of foreign maritime liens: how effective is a US choice of law in bunker supply contract between the supplier and time charterer for obtaining a necessaries lien?", Master, pp.2016

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)