The Backward Reform of the Criminal Justice System in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the restoration of independence in 1945, Korea has witnessed enormous changes in many ways. The criminal justice system is one of them. Although there have been some fluctuations, the system has generally evolved from the crime control model to the due process model and from authoritarian policing to democratic policing. Recently, a new legislation has been enacted under the banner of prosecution reform. It was the current government who took the initiative of the legislation. The reform was made in the name of serving the people. The legislation went through formalities of statutory process. Seemingly it appears to be democratic. However, the reform constructed a criminal justice system that is possibly favorable to political power rather than ordinary people including political opponents. Contrary to what was alleged by the government, there is a high risk that the reform leads to a weird type of policing, socialistic stealth authoritarian policing.
Abstract
Since the restoration of independence in 1945, Korea has witnessed enormous changes in many ways. The criminal justice system is one of them. Although there have been some fluctuations, the system has generally evolved from the crime control model to the due process model and from authoritarian policing to democratic policing. Recently, a new legislation has been enacted under the banner of prosecution reform. It was the current government who took the initiative of the legislation. The reform was made in the name of serving the people. The legislation went through formalities of statutory process. Seemingly it appears to be democratic. However, the reform constructed a criminal justice system that is possibly favorable to political power rather than ordinary people including political opponents. Contrary to what was alleged by the government, there is a high risk that the reform leads to a weird type of policing, socialistic stealth authoritarian policing.
참고문헌 (35)
- , 2007Do3061, Nov. 15, 2007, , 2007
- , 2003Hun-Ka7, May 26, 2005, (2005 DKCC, 64), , 2005
- Herbert L. Packer, "Two Models of the Criminal Process", U. Pa. L. Rev., 113, pp.1~ (1964)
- Herbert L. Packer, "The Limits of the Criminal Sanction", pp.158~ (1968)
- Kent Roach, "Four Models of the Criminal Process", J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 89, pp.671~ (1999)
- "United States v. Garsson, 291 F. 646, 649 (S.D.N.Y. 1923)", ~ (1923)
- Phillipe C. Schmitter, "What Democracy Is … and Is Not", J. Democr., 2(3), pp.75~88 (1991)
- Larry Jay Diamond, "Thinking about Hybrid Regimes", J. Democr, 13(2), pp.21~ (2002)
- Joseph Schu mpeter, "Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy", pp.269~ (1947)
- Axel Hadenius, "Authoritarian Regimes: Stability, Change, and Pathways to Democracy, 1972-2003" (2006)
- Magnus Bjørndal, "Authoritarian Regime Type, Oil Rents and Democratic Transition", pp.5~6 (2015)
- Tim Kelsall, "Authoritarianism, Democracy and Development(DLP, The State of the Art Series)", pp.15~ (2004)
- Dawn Brancati, "Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects", Ann. Rev. Pol. Sci, 17, pp.313~ (2014)
- Scott Barclay, "Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes by Ginsburg & Moustafa", Law & Soc’y Rev., 43, pp.241~ (2009)
- Milan W. Svolik, "The Politics of Authoritarian Rule", pp.2~ (2012)
- Marlies Glasius, "What Authoritarianism Is…and Is Not: A Practice Perspective", International Affairs, 94(3), pp.515~ (2018)
- Rachel A. Harmon, "The Problem of Policing", Mich. L. Rev, 110, pp.761~ (2012)
- Lily Rahim, "Authoritarian Rule of Law: Legislation, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore by Jothie Rajah", Law & Soc’y Rev, 47, pp.697~ (2013)
- Stephen Rushin, "De-policing", Cornell L. Rev, 102, pp.721~ (2017)
- Sang Won Lee, "RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE LEGISLATION AND THE JUDICIARY", pp.169~ (2018)
- , 85Mo16, July 29, 1985, , 1985
- , 93Da35155, Nov. 23, 1993, , 1993
- , 93Do958, Mar. 11, 1994, , 1994
- , 91Do453, May 10, 1991, , 1991
- , 2007Do3061, Nov. 15, 2007, , 2007
- , 2000Hun-Ma138, Sept. 23, 2004 (2004 DKCC, 75), , 2004
- Sang Won Lee, "Law’s Dilemmas", pp.139~ (2020)
- Mark P. Petracca, "The Concept of Chinese Neo-Authoritarianism: An Exploration and Democratic Critique", Asian Survey, 30(11), pp.1099~1017 (1990)
- The Rise of Neo-Authoritarianism: Political Economy and Culture in the Trajectory of Singaporean Capitalism, "Daniel Goh", Ctr. for Rsch. on Soc. Org, ~, pp.Ctr. for Rsch. on Soc. Org. Working Paper Ser. No. 591 (2002)
- Ozan O. Varol, "Stealth Authoritarianism", Iowa L. Rev, 100, pp.1673~ (2015)
- Leah Gilbert, "Beyond Authoritarianism: The Conceptualization of Hybrid Regimes", Stud. Comp. Int'l Dev, 46, pp.270~ (2011)