Construction of Korean Constitutional Law Article 103's "Conscience of Judge”: Comparison with Construction of Japanese Constitutional law Article 76 paragraph 3

참고문헌 (80)

1. (2021)[URL]
2. , Art. 76, Para. 3,
3. Amy Coney Barrett, "Procedural Common Law", Virginia Law Review, 94, pp.813~ (2008)
4. Nak-in Seong, , pp.729~ (2016)
5. Chulsoo Kim, , pp.1654~ (2013)
6. Yeong Heo, , pp.1062~ (2015)
7. "Seoul L. J", 2016, 63~
8. "Forum", 1987, 237~
9. 이덕연, "헌법 제103조에서 법관의 독립과 양심", 공법연구, 38(2), pp.349~375 (2009), 한국공법학회
10. "Supreme Court L. R", 2014, 565~
11. Chul-soo Kim, , pp.329~ (2014)
12. Jong-sup Chong, , pp.796~ (2010)
13. "Sekai", 1953, 132~
14. Wenjiang Guang, , pp.49~51 (2020)
16. "2017", 15
17. Jong-sup Chong, , pp.1412~ (2016)
18. 강석정, "법관은 두 개의 양심을 가져야 하는가? - 헌법 제103조 법관의 ‘양심’에 관하여", 사법, 1(41), pp.153~198 (2017), 사법발전재단[DOI]
19. "The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Seung-tae Yang’s address at ceremony of newly appointed judges" (2021)[URL]
20. "1971", 4, pp.(InKorean)
21. Kwang-seok Cheon, , pp.769~ (2016)
22. Chul-soo Kim, , pp.663~ (1971)
23. Tae-yeon Han, , pp.516~517 (1964)
24. "Houno Sihai", 1971, 2~
25. "Juristo", 1971, 83~
27. Ronald M. Dworkin, "Taking rights seriously", pp.40~ (2005)
28. Un-jong Park, , pp.217~281 (2010)
29. 양천수, "법률에 반하는 법형성의 정당화 가능성: 이론적ㆍ실정법적 근거와 인정범위 그리고 한계", 법과사회, (52), pp.107~142 (2016), 법과사회이론학회
30. Joel Feinberg, "Problems at the Roots of Law: Essays in Legal and Political Theory", pp.3~ (2003)
31. Kyung-ho Lee, , pp.407~408 (1959)
32. "Chapter", 2015, ~
35. , Order No. 24, Apr. 16, 1947 (Syouwa 22), amended by Order No. 381, Dec. 20, 1966 (Syouwa 41), , 1966
36. Act No. 76, Apr. 19, 1947(Syouwa 22), amended by Act No. 198, Dec. 17, 1947, , 1947
37. , Edict No. 52, Jan. 30, 1946 (Syouwa 21), amended by Edict No. 120, June. 18, 1946 (Syouwa21), , 1946
38. Kouzi Sato, , pp.327~328 (1995)
40. Kotaro Tanaka, , pp.352~ (1937)
41. , Nov. 3, 1946, Art. 19, , 1946
42. "Horitsuzihou", 1954, 719~, (InJapanese)
43. "Juristo", 2010, 11~, (InJapanese)
44. Ryuichi Hirano, , pp.52~54 (1958)
45. "Juristo", 1971, 20~
46. "Hougaku", 2007, 545~, (InJapanese)
47. Shigemitsu Dando, , pp.37~ (1953)
48. "Housouzihou", 1955, 1~, (InJapanese)
49. "Houritsuzihou", 1954, 124~, (InJapanese)
50. Siro Kiyomiya, , pp.291~ (1960)
51. "Juristo", 1971, 117~
52. Paul Güiland, , pp.50~ (1960)
53. Hideo Saito, , pp.29~120 (1955)
55. Miyoko Tsuzimura, , pp.439~440 (2018)
57. Tetsuzou Sasaki, , pp.27~ (1964)
58. "Juristo", 1971, 44~
60. Yasuo Hasebe, , pp.209~ (2013)
61. "Houritsuzihou", 2015, 148~
62. Nobuyosi Asibe, , pp.360~ (2019)
63. "Hounosihai", 2010, 42~
65. "Hougakusemina", 2008, 42~
67. "Juristo", 1971, 34~
68. Gustav Radbruch, , pp.44~ (1952)
69. Toshio Yokokawa, , pp.195~ (1973)
71. Tatsukichi Minobe, , pp.407~ (1952)
72. "Juristo", 1971, 189~
73. "Houritsuzihou", 1970, 8~
74. Shigeru Minamino, , pp.5~ (2009)
75. "Study of Constitutional Law", 2005, 79~
76. Amy Coney Barrett, "Precedent and Jurisprudential Disagreement", Tex. L. Rev, 91, pp.1711~ (2012)
77. Taro Kogayu, , pp.152~ (2008)
78. "Houritsuzihou", 2015, 142~
79. 김창록, "한국과 일본에서의 ‘로스쿨’ 논의", 법학연구, 48(1), pp.53~92 (2007), 법학연구소
80. Ronald M. Dworkin, "Law’s Empire", pp.228~229 (1986)

관련 논문AI추천