국내 KBS-3 방식 고준위방사성폐기물 심층처분시설 방사선학적 안전성 평가대상 방사성핵종 목록 선정개념(안) 제언
Suggestion on Screening Concept of Radionuclides to be Considered for the Radiological Safety Assessment of the Domestic KBS-3 Type Geological Disposal Facility of High-level Radioactive Waste (HLW)
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The transport calculation for a wide variety of radionuclides contained in high-levelradioactive waste, especially spent nuclear fuel, is computationally difficult, and input data collection forthis also take a considerable amount of time. Accordingly, considering limited resources, it is possibleto reduce the calculation time while minimizing impact on accuracy by including only radionuclidesimportant to calculation result through applying some criteria among potential radiation source termsthat may release into environment. In this paper, therefore, we reviewed and analyzed the screeningprocess performed to select radionuclides to be considered in the safety assessment for the KBS-3 typerepository in Sweden and Finland. In both countries, it was confirmed that a list of radionuclides wasselected by comprehensively considering screening criteria such as radioactivity inventory, half-life,radiotoxicity, risk quotient, and transport properties, and etc. A comparison of radionuclides includedin the radiological safety assessment in both countries suggests that most of nuclides are consideredin common, and a few nuclides considered only in one country are due to differences in decay chaintreatment or spent fuel types. As of now, since most of information on the disposal facility in Korea hasnot been determined, it is necessary to comprehensively model release and transport of all radionuclidesconsidered in Sweden and Finland when performing the radiological safety assessment. Based on theseresults, we derived the screening concept of selecting a list of radionuclides to be considered in theradiological safety assessment for the domestic KBS-3 type geological disposal facility, and this resultis expected to be used as technical basis for confirming conformity with the safety objective. In a moredetailed evaluation reflecting domestic characteristics in the future, it would be desirable to consider onlyradionuclides selected in accordance with the screening procedure. However, further research should beconducted to determine the quantitative limit for each criteria.
Abstract
The transport calculation for a wide variety of radionuclides contained in high-levelradioactive waste, especially spent nuclear fuel, is computationally difficult, and input data collection forthis also take a considerable amount of time. Accordingly, considering limited resources, it is possibleto reduce the calculation time while minimizing impact on accuracy by including only radionuclidesimportant to calculation result through applying some criteria among potential radiation source termsthat may release into environment. In this paper, therefore, we reviewed and analyzed the screeningprocess performed to select radionuclides to be considered in the safety assessment for the KBS-3 typerepository in Sweden and Finland. In both countries, it was confirmed that a list of radionuclides wasselected by comprehensively considering screening criteria such as radioactivity inventory, half-life,radiotoxicity, risk quotient, and transport properties, and etc. A comparison of radionuclides includedin the radiological safety assessment in both countries suggests that most of nuclides are consideredin common, and a few nuclides considered only in one country are due to differences in decay chaintreatment or spent fuel types. As of now, since most of information on the disposal facility in Korea hasnot been determined, it is necessary to comprehensively model release and transport of all radionuclidesconsidered in Sweden and Finland when performing the radiological safety assessment. Based on theseresults, we derived the screening concept of selecting a list of radionuclides to be considered in theradiological safety assessment for the domestic KBS-3 type geological disposal facility, and this resultis expected to be used as technical basis for confirming conformity with the safety objective. In a moredetailed evaluation reflecting domestic characteristics in the future, it would be desirable to consider onlyradionuclides selected in accordance with the screening procedure. However, further research should beconducted to determine the quantitative limit for each criteria.
참고문헌 (12)
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, "Enforcement Decree Of The Nuclear Safety Act", Presidential Decree No. 31824, ~ (2021)
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, "Standards for Radiation Protection, and etc. Notice No. 2019-10", ~ (2019)
- Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Radioactive Waste Management Act. Act No. 15082", ~ (2017)
- The Second Basic Plan for the Management of High-Level Radioactive Waste(Draft), "Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy", ~ (2021)
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, "General Standards for Geological Disposal Facility of High-level Radioactive Waste", Notice No. 2021-21, ~ (2021)
- Radionuclide Transport Report for the Safety Assessment SR-Site, "SKB(Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB)", SKB, ~, pp.SKB TR-10-50 (2010)
- Beräkning av nuklidinnehall, resteffekt, aktivitet samt doshastighet för utbränt kärnbränsle(Swedish version), "Rune Håkansson", SKB, ~, pp.SKB Rapport R-99-74 (2000)
- Council Directive 96, "92", EURATOM of 13 May 1996 Laying Down Basic Safety Standards for the Protection of the Health of Workers and the General Public against the Dangers Arising from Ionizing Radiation, European Commission, pp.1996, ~
- Safety Case for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel at Olkiluoto-Assessment of Radionuclide Release Scenari"os for the Repository System 2012, "Posiva Oy.", POSIVA, ~, pp.POSIVA 2012-09 (2012)
- Safety Case for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel at Olkiluoto-Models and Data for the Repository System 2012, "Posiva Oy", POSIVA, ~, pp.POSIVA 2013-01 (2013)
- STUK(Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority)., "Disposal of Nuclear Waste", GUIDE YVL D.5, ~ (2018)
- Spent Nuclear Fuel Assay Data for Isotopic Validation: State-of-the-Art Report, "Nuclear Energy Agency", NEA, WPNCS, pp.DOC, 2011[DOI]
