A Study on the Development of Library ESG Management Evaluation Indicator and the Evaluation Result of Library ESG
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, the library ESG evaluation indicators specialized for libraries were developed, and based on which, a survey was conducted targeting the actual libraries to evaluate the ESG level of libraries. As a result of the study, first, among the ESG evaluation indicators, the indicators of the social field and the governance field are demonstrating high in which field of the library’s ESG evaluation indicators will appear the highest. The social area’s high score of 3.70 seems to be because the protection of users’ rights, occupational safety, and contribution to society and the local community are very closely related to the original role of the library. Second, it may be seen that there is a difference between the questions in the corporate governance part, while the averages are the same. In the case of library’s cooperation, it turned out that it was 3.94 in the necessity evaluation of the evaluation indicators, but it was lowered to 3.61 in the actual library situation evaluation. Meanwhile, in connection with the activities of the director of library and the board of directors, it may be seen that the index evaluation increased from 3.32 to 3.58 in the actual evaluation.
Abstract
In this study, the library ESG evaluation indicators specialized for libraries were developed, and based on which, a survey was conducted targeting the actual libraries to evaluate the ESG level of libraries. As a result of the study, first, among the ESG evaluation indicators, the indicators of the social field and the governance field are demonstrating high in which field of the library’s ESG evaluation indicators will appear the highest. The social area’s high score of 3.70 seems to be because the protection of users’ rights, occupational safety, and contribution to society and the local community are very closely related to the original role of the library. Second, it may be seen that there is a difference between the questions in the corporate governance part, while the averages are the same. In the case of library’s cooperation, it turned out that it was 3.94 in the necessity evaluation of the evaluation indicators, but it was lowered to 3.61 in the actual library situation evaluation. Meanwhile, in connection with the activities of the director of library and the board of directors, it may be seen that the index evaluation increased from 3.32 to 3.58 in the actual evaluation.
참고문헌 (29)
- Byun, Youngjo, "Research Trend on ESG Management of Corporation", Clean Technology, 28(2), pp.193~120 (2022)
- Hwang, Su Deok, "A Study on the Improvement of Evaluation System for ESG Management in Public Institutions", Journal of the Korean Society of Cadastre, 38(2), pp.87~105 (2022)[DOI]
- Jeong, Kyeo Woon, "A Study on the Development of Consumer Based ESG Scale", Ph. D., Business Administration, pp.2022
- Joint Government Offices, "K-ESG Guidelines V1.0", Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, ~ (2021)
- Won Kang, "Effect of ESG Activities and Firm’s Financial Characteristics", Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 49(5), pp.681~707 (2020), Korean Securities Association[DOI]
- Keller, S., "Chancen und Grenzen von ESG-Rating", pp.2015
- Kim, Eun-Hae, "A Study on the Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Managemen", Review of Accounting and Policy Studies, 25(2), pp.251~277 (2020)[DOI]
- Kim, Jiyeon, "A Study on ESG Evaluation Indicators for Corporate-led Public Design", Master, Public Design, pp.2021
- Knecht, F., "CSR und Finance" (2014)
- Korea Economic Daily, "ESG Concept to Practice : K Corporate Survival Plan", Korea Economic Daily, ~ (2021)
- 2021 Global Market Report 21-026: A successful case of ESG response by foreign companies, "KOTRA", ~ (2021)
- KPMG, "ESG management, corporate answers for a sustainable world and business", SAMJONG KPMG Newsletter, ~ (2021)
- Lee, Jeongki, "Current Status and Future Directions of Research on"Sustainable Management" : Focusing on the ESG Measurement Index", Journal of Strategic Management, 23(2), pp.65~92 (2020)[DOI]
- Lee, Jihye, "A Study on the Necessity of Promoting ESG Management of SMEs Through Empirical Analysis of ESG Ratings", The Journal of Humanties and Social Sciences, 40(3), pp.2787~2802 (2022)[DOI]
- Lim, Hyung-Chul, "Strategies to Expand SMEs ESG Management through Domestic and Foreign ESG Cases", Asia-Pacific Journal of Business, 44(4), pp.179~192 (2021)[DOI]
- Lim, Jong-Ok, "Effects of Business Value of ESG Evaluation Information and Earnings Management", Korean Business Education Review, 31(1), pp.111~139 (2016)
- Mayer, K., "Nachhaltigkeit: 111 Fragen und Antworten: Nachschlagewerk zur Umsetzung von CSR im Unternehmen" (2017), Springer Gabler
- "Neutinamu Library ESG"[URL]
- Noh, Y., "A Study on the Development of ESG Management Evaluation Index for Library", Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(1), pp.309~338 (2023)
- Schaltegger, S., "In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management : Legitimacy-or Profit-Seeking?", Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), pp.259~276 (2017)
- "The main contents and implications of the new government’s national agenda" (2022)[URL]
- Sparkes, R., "The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment. A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility", Journal of Business Ethics, pp.45~57 (2004)
- Suh, Yonggu, "A Study on Coupang’s ESG Management : Centering on Rocket Delivery", Journal of Product Research, 40(1), pp.67~75 (2022)[DOI]
- Suk, Jung Il, "A Study on the Influence of ESG Indicators on the Continuous Socially Responsible Investment of Financial Consumers", Ph. D., pp.2021
- Sustin Best Company ESG Analysis Report, "Sustin Best", Sustin Best, ~ (2021)
- WCED, S. W. S., "World Commission on Environment and Development", Our Common Future, 17(1), pp.1~91 (1987)
- Werner, G., "Social Credit Rating:Reputation und Vertrauen Beurteilen" (2020)
- Windolph, S. E., "Assessing Corporate Sustainability Through Ratings: Challenges and Their Causes", Journal of Environmental Sustainability, pp.37~57 (2013)