Clinical Characteristics of Primary and Secondary Osteoporotic Fractures: Data from Single Referral Center Emergency Department
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: To investigate the characteristics of patients with osteoporotic fractures (OF) who visited the emergency room, we analyzed the frequency and distribution of primary and secondary OF. Methods: From March 2015 to April 2017, 406 patients with OF were assigned to wrist (W; n=132), spine (S; n=78), and hip (H; n=196) according to the site. All subjects were classified as having primary fracture or secondary fracture. Age, fracture site, the risk of future fracture using Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) were compared. Results: The mean age at fracture site was significantly different among the 3 groups, groups W (66.57±10.03), S (73.50±9.07), and H (78.50±7.72). The most common site of OF were in the order of wrist, spine, and hip with the increase of age. The FRAX scores significantly increased (P<0.001) in the order of W (8.35±5.67), S (10.74±6.99), and H (13.88±7.98) in total patient, and same in primary fracture group (W, 7.50± 4.18; S, 9.76±5.91; H, 11.93±6.61; P<0.001). The main site of prior fractures in secondary fracture was same lesion, which means that the prior fracture of secondary wrist fracture was wrist fracture such as spine for spine, hip for hip. Conclusions: We determined that as age increasing, the major sites of OF were different and FRAX scores increased. The most common site for secondary fracture was the same one. Hence, the risk of subsequent fracture in same site should be noted after patient suffered OF.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the characteristics of patients with osteoporotic fractures (OF) who visited the emergency room, we analyzed the frequency and distribution of primary and secondary OF. Methods: From March 2015 to April 2017, 406 patients with OF were assigned to wrist (W; n=132), spine (S; n=78), and hip (H; n=196) according to the site. All subjects were classified as having primary fracture or secondary fracture. Age, fracture site, the risk of future fracture using Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) were compared. Results: The mean age at fracture site was significantly different among the 3 groups, groups W (66.57±10.03), S (73.50±9.07), and H (78.50±7.72). The most common site of OF were in the order of wrist, spine, and hip with the increase of age. The FRAX scores significantly increased (P<0.001) in the order of W (8.35±5.67), S (10.74±6.99), and H (13.88±7.98) in total patient, and same in primary fracture group (W, 7.50± 4.18; S, 9.76±5.91; H, 11.93±6.61; P<0.001). The main site of prior fractures in secondary fracture was same lesion, which means that the prior fracture of secondary wrist fracture was wrist fracture such as spine for spine, hip for hip. Conclusions: We determined that as age increasing, the major sites of OF were different and FRAX scores increased. The most common site for secondary fracture was the same one. Hence, the risk of subsequent fracture in same site should be noted after patient suffered OF.
참고문헌 (36)
- Roux C, "Imminent fracture risk", Osteoporos Int, 28, pp.1765~1769 (2017)
- Cauley JA, "Osteoporosis: fracture epidemiology update 2016", Curr Opin Rheumatol, 29, pp.150~156 (2017)
- Bonafede M, "Predicting imminent risk for fracture in patients aged 50 or older with osteoporosis using US claims data", Arch Osteoporos, 11, pp.26~ (2016)
- Riggs BL, "The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology", Bone, 17, pp.505s~511s (1995)
- Mohd-Tahir NA, "Economic burden of osteoporosis-related hip fracture in Asia: a systematic review", Osteoporos Int, 28, pp.2035~2044 (2017)
- Kim J, "Economic burden of osteoporotic fracture of the elderly in South Korea: A national survey", Value Health Reg Issues, pp.36~41 (2016)
- Cobden A, "Effects of postoperative osteoporosis treatment on subsequent fracture and the 5-year survival rates after hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture", Arch Osteoporos, 14, pp.100~ (2019)
- Rossi LMM, "Factors related with osteoporosis treatment in postmenopausal women", Medicine (Baltimore), 97, pp.e11524~ (2018)
- Reynolds K, "Primary non-adherence to bisphosphonates in an integrated healthcare setting", Osteoporos Int, 24, pp.2509~2517 (2013)
- Mitchell P, "Implementation of models of care for secondary osteoporotic fracture prevention and orthogeriatric models of care for osteoporotic hip fracture", Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 30, pp.536~558 (2016)
- Saito T, "Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis", Osteoporos Int, 28, pp.3289~3300 (2017)
- 유제현, "Osteoporotic Fracture: 2015 Position Statement of the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research", 대한골대사학회지, 22(4), pp.175~181 (2015), 대한골대사학회
- Johansson H, "FRAX- vs. T-score-based intervention thresholds for osteoporosis", Osteoporos Int, 28, pp.3099~3105 (2017)
- McCloskey EV, "FRAX updates 2016", Curr Opin Rheumatol, 28, pp.433~441 (2016)
- anis JA, "FRAX update", J Clin Densitom, 20, pp.360~367 (2017)
- McCloskey E, "Fracture risk assessment", Clin Biochem, 45, pp.887~893 (2012)
- Kanis JA, "Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds", Osteoporos Int, 12, pp.989~995 (2001)
- Uusi-Rasi K, "Bone mass and strength and fall-related fractures in older age", J Osteoporos, 2019, pp.5134690~ (2019)
- Johnell O, "An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures", Osteoporos Int, 17, pp.1726~1733 (2006)
- Gregg EW, "Physical activity and osteoporotic fracture risk in older women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group", Ann Intern Med, 129, pp.81~88 (1998)
- Schousboe JT, "Association between prior non-spine non-hip fractures or prevalent radiographic vertebral deformities known to be at least 10 years old and incident hip fracture", J Bone Miner Res, 21, pp.1557~1564
- Siris ES, "Enhanced prediction of fracture risk combining vertebral fracture status and BMD", Osteoporos Int, 18, pp.761~770 (2007)
- Bynum JPW, "Second fractures among older adults in the year following hip, shoulder, or wrist fracture", Osteoporos Int, 27, pp.2207~2215 (2016)
- 강번중, "Mortality after Hip Fractures in Nonagenarians", 대한골대사학회지, 19(2), pp.83~86 (2012), 대한골대사학회
- Paksima N, "Predictors of mortality after hip fracture: a 10-year prospective study", Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 66, pp.111~117 (2008)
- Villareal DT, "Bone mineral density response to caloric restriction-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss: a randomized controlled trial", Arch Intern Med, 166, pp.2502~2510 (2006)
- Schürer C, "Fracture risk and risk factors for osteoporosis", Dtsch Arztebl Int, 112, pp.365~371 (2015)
- Langlois JA, "Hip fracture risk in older white men is associated with change in body weight from age 50 years to old age", Arch Intern Med, 158, pp.990~996 (1998)
- Hariri AF, "Relationship between body mass index and T-scores of bone mineral density in the hip and spine regions among older adults with diabetes: A retrospective review", J Obes, 2019, pp.9827403~ (2019)
- Bohlken J, "Hip fracture risk in patients with dementia in German primary care practices", Dementia (London), 16, pp.853~864 (2017)
- Downey CL, "Dementia and osteoporosis in a geriatric population: Is there a common link", World J Orthop, 8, pp.412~423 (2017)
- 김상림, "Undertreatment of Osteoporosis Following Hip Fractures in Jeju Cohort Study", 대한골대사학회지, 21(4), pp.263~268 (2014), 대한골대사학회[DOI]
- Miller PD, "An approach to identifying osteopenic women at increased short-term risk of fracture", Arch Intern Med, 164, pp.1113~1120 (2004)
- Wainwright SA, "Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 90, pp.2787~2793
- Giangregorio LM, "FRAX underestimates fracture risk in patients with diabetes", J Bone Miner Res, 27, pp.301~308 (2012)
- Leib ES, "Official positions for FRAX(®) clinical regarding glucocorticoids: the impact of the use of glucocorticoids on the estimate by FRAX(®) of the 10 year risk of fracture from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX(®)", J Clin Densitom, 14, pp.212~219 (2011)