Publication Trends in Osteoporosis Treatment: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Osteoporosis prevalence continues to escalate with the growth of the older adult population. In this study, we aimed to investigate the profile of osteoporosis treatment-related research articles published in the past 20 years using bibliometric analysis. Methods: We analyzed all osteoporosis treatment-related articles published between 2001 and 2020 in the Web of Science (WoS) database using bibliometric methods. In the Title search section in WoS, we searched the documents using “osteoporosis treatment”-related keywords. We used the VOSviewer software to construct the bibliometric maps of keyword co-occurrences. Results: Our search yielded 29,738 publications, 21,556 (72.5%) were original articles and 4,529 (15.2%) were review articles and review articles (4,529). We noticed a steady increase in the publication numbers from 2001 to 2020. The overall scientific publication number in WoS increased 3.5-fold, with the five most productive countries being the USA, China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan. The largest contributor was the University of California system. The most productive journals were Osteoporosis International (1,679, 6.4%), Bone (832, 3.2%), and the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (727, 2.8%). We observed increasing trends in the appearance of denosumab and teriparatide during the last two decades. In our keyword co-occurrence analysis, we constructed four keyword clusters using VOSviewer. Conclusions: In this study, we provided a gross overview of the visibility and productivity of research studies in osteoporosis treatment. Substantial changes have occurred in osteoporosis treatment over the last 20 years. The effector mechanism of anti-osteoporosis medications could be future hot spots in osteoporosis research. We believe that our study is a valuable guide for clinicians related to the global outputs of osteoporosis treatment.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis prevalence continues to escalate with the growth of the older adult population. In this study, we aimed to investigate the profile of osteoporosis treatment-related research articles published in the past 20 years using bibliometric analysis. Methods: We analyzed all osteoporosis treatment-related articles published between 2001 and 2020 in the Web of Science (WoS) database using bibliometric methods. In the Title search section in WoS, we searched the documents using “osteoporosis treatment”-related keywords. We used the VOSviewer software to construct the bibliometric maps of keyword co-occurrences. Results: Our search yielded 29,738 publications, 21,556 (72.5%) were original articles and 4,529 (15.2%) were review articles and review articles (4,529). We noticed a steady increase in the publication numbers from 2001 to 2020. The overall scientific publication number in WoS increased 3.5-fold, with the five most productive countries being the USA, China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan. The largest contributor was the University of California system. The most productive journals were Osteoporosis International (1,679, 6.4%), Bone (832, 3.2%), and the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (727, 2.8%). We observed increasing trends in the appearance of denosumab and teriparatide during the last two decades. In our keyword co-occurrence analysis, we constructed four keyword clusters using VOSviewer. Conclusions: In this study, we provided a gross overview of the visibility and productivity of research studies in osteoporosis treatment. Substantial changes have occurred in osteoporosis treatment over the last 20 years. The effector mechanism of anti-osteoporosis medications could be future hot spots in osteoporosis research. We believe that our study is a valuable guide for clinicians related to the global outputs of osteoporosis treatment.
참고문헌 (24)
- Sözen T, "An overview and management of osteoporosis", Eur J Rheumatol, 4, pp.46~56 (2017)[DOI]
- Watts NB, "American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis", Endocr Pract, 16(Suppl 3), pp.1~37 (2010)[DOI]
- Wright NC, "The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine", J Bone Miner Res, 29, pp.2520~2526 (2014)[DOI]
- Reginster JY, "Osteoporosis : a still increasing prevalence", Bone, 38, pp.S4~S9 (2006)[DOI]
- Zhou S, "Mapping theme trends and recognizing hot spots in postmenopausal osteoporosis research : a bibliometric analysis", PeerJ, 7, pp.e8145~ (2019)[DOI]
- Demir E, "The evolution of the field of legal medicine : a holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis", J Forensic Leg Med, 69, pp.101885~ (2020)[DOI]
- Koo M, "A bibliometric analysis of two decades of aromatherapy research", BMC Res Notes, 10, pp.46~ (2017)[DOI]
- Zhang H, "Research trends and hotspots of high tibial osteotomy in two decades(from 2001 to 2020) : a bibliometric analysis", J Orthop Surg Res, 15, pp.512~ (2020)[DOI]
- Yi F, "Tracing the scientific outputs in the field of Ebola research based on publications in the Web of Science", BMC Res Notes, 9, pp.221~ (2016)[DOI]
- Fu HZ, "Mapping of drinking water research : a bibliometric analysis of research output during 1992-2011", Sci Total Environ, 443, pp.757~765 (2013)[DOI]
- Scherer RW, "ClinicalTrials. gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews : a comparison study", BMC Med Res Methodol, 13, pp.79~ (2013)[DOI]
- Scherer RW, "Using ClinicalTrials. gov to supplement information in ophthalmology conference abstracts about trial outcomes : a comparison study", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0130619~ (2015)[DOI]
- Briganti M, "Bibliometric analysis of electronic cigarette publications : 2003-2018", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16, pp.320~ (2019)[DOI]
- Hirsch JE, "An index to quantify an individual, s scientific research output", Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102, pp.16569~16572 (2005)[DOI]
- Huang T, "Global trends of researches on sacral fracture surgery : a bibliometric study based on VOSviewer", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 45, pp.E721~E728 (2020)[DOI]
- Lin X, "Epidemiology and management of osteoporosis in the People, s Republic of China : current perspectives", Clin Interv Aging, 10, pp.1017~1033 (2015)[DOI]
- Evaniew N, "The scholarly influence of orthopaedic research according to conventional and alternative metrics : a systematic review", JBJS Rev, 5, pp.e5~ (2017)[DOI]
- Smith R, "Beware the tyranny of impact factors", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90, pp.125~126 (2008)[DOI]
- Cheng T, "Research in orthopaedics from China has thrived over the last decade : a bibliometric analysis of publication activity", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 98, pp.253~258 (2012)[DOI]
- Jha S, "Trends in media reports, oral bisphosphonate prescriptions, and hip fractures 1996-2012 : an ecological analysis", J Bone Miner Res, 30, pp.2179~2187 (2015)[DOI]
- Hadji P, "GRAND-4 : the German retrospective analysis of long-term persistence in women with osteoporosis treated with bisphosphonates or denosumab", Osteoporos Int, 27, pp.2967~2978 (2016)[DOI]
- Marshall D, "Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures", BMJ, 312, pp.1254~1259 (1996)[DOI]
- Diab DL, "Bisphosphonate drug holiday : who, when and how long", Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis, 5, pp.107~111 (2013)[DOI]
- Whitaker M, "Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis-where do we go from here?", N Engl J Med, 366, pp.2048~2051 (2012)[DOI]