본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국판 전문직 간 학습에 대한 자기 효능감 척도의 타당화

Validity of the Self‐efficacy for Interprofessional Experimental Learning Scale in Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Interprofessional education (IPE) can promote high-quality patient care and good medical outcomes through teamwork among health professionals. However, there are no valid measurements to prove the effectiveness of IPE in Korea. This study aimed to develop and test a Korean version of the Self-efficacy for Interprofessional Experimental Learning Scale (SEIEL). The original SEIEL was translated into Korean by two experienced medical professors, and 368 questionnaires were collected from medical and nursing students (third and fourth year). To analyze the validity of the Korean version of the SEIEL, an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Cronbach’s α was used to evaluate reliability. Results from the exploratory factor analysis identified two functions: “interprofessional collaboration” and “interprofessional team evaluation.” A significant cross-correlation was found between the two functions (r=0.690, p<0.001), with a Cronbach’s α value of 0.932. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the SEIEL was identified in this study. This tool can be helpful in measuring the effectiveness of IPE in Korea.

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) can promote high-quality patient care and good medical outcomes through teamwork among health professionals. However, there are no valid measurements to prove the effectiveness of IPE in Korea. This study aimed to develop and test a Korean version of the Self-efficacy for Interprofessional Experimental Learning Scale (SEIEL). The original SEIEL was translated into Korean by two experienced medical professors, and 368 questionnaires were collected from medical and nursing students (third and fourth year). To analyze the validity of the Korean version of the SEIEL, an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Cronbach’s α was used to evaluate reliability. Results from the exploratory factor analysis identified two functions: “interprofessional collaboration” and “interprofessional team evaluation.” A significant cross-correlation was found between the two functions (r=0.690, p<0.001), with a Cronbach’s α value of 0.932. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the SEIEL was identified in this study. This tool can be helpful in measuring the effectiveness of IPE in Korea.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. World Health Organization, "Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice" (2010), World Health Organization
  2. 이규식, "의료기관평가인증의 목표와 과제", 대한의사협회지, 55(1), pp.7~16 (2012), 대한의사협회
  3. Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation, "Accreditation standards of KIMEE 2019" (2018), Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation
  4. 안덕선, "한국의 의사상: 좋은 의사양성", 의학교육논단, 16(3), pp.119~125 (2014), 연세대학교 의과대학
  5. Korea Association of Medical Colleges, "Learning outcomes of basic medical education: human and society-centered" (2017), Korea Association of Medical Colleges
  6. Barr H, "A practical guide for medical teachers", pp.203~216 (2005), Elsevier Churchill Livingstone
  7. Howkins E, "Preparing for interprofessional teaching:theory and practice", pp.1~2 (2007), Radcliffe
  8. "New collaborations to improve health care in our communities: annual report" (2006)[URL]
  9. Liaskos J, "Promoting interprofessional education in health sector within the European Interprofessional Education Network", Int J Med Inform, 78(Suppl 1), pp.S43~S47 (2009)
  10. "Core competencies for interprefessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel" (2011)[URL]
  11. World Health Organization, "Multi-professional patient safety curriculum guide" (2012), World Health Organization
  12. "Gumi University, 3rd rehabilitation interprofessional education" (2016)[URL]
  13. "Gwangju Health University, interprofessional education" (2017)[URL]
  14. 임선주, "의전원생·한의전원생을 위한 협진 PBL 교육 프로그램의 효과", 동의생리병리학회지, 30(3), pp.137~141 (2016), 한의병리학회[DOI]
  15. Eva KW, "Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda", Acad Med, 80(10 Suppl), pp.S46~S54 (2005)
  16. Linda Townsend, "Self-Efficacy Related to Student Nurses in the Clinical Setting: A Concept Analysis", International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 8(1), pp.1~15 (2011), Walter de Gruyter GmbH[DOI]
  17. Bandura A, "Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change", Psychol Rev, 84(2), pp.191~215 (1977)
  18. Bae JS, "A study on the relationships between the self-concept and self-efficacy, and the school achievement", pp.1998
  19. Mann K, "Development of a scale to measure health professions students’ self-efficacy beliefs in interprofessional learning", J Interprof Care, 26(2), pp.92~99 (2012)
  20. DeVellis RF, "Scale development: theory and applications", pp.115~118 (2012), Sage Publications
  21. Byrne BM, "Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL:comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument", Int J Test, 1(1), pp.55~86 (2001)
  22. 김소연, "의과대학에서의 보건의료 전문직 간 교육에 대한 현황과 인식", 의학교육논단, 19(1), pp.10~17 (2017), 연세대학교 의과대학
  23. Hong S, "The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales", Korean J Clin Psychol, 19(1), pp.161~177 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)