Cost-Effectiveness of Denosumab for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in South Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Osteoporosis is a progressive skeletal disease associated with an increased risk of bone fracture. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab for osteoporotic fracture prevention compared to bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) in a cohort of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods: A Markov model was used to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of denosumab versus comparators. The model had a cycle length of 6 months and was run from the age of 68 years to individual patients' lifetime or the age of 100 years. The health states considered in the model were well, hip fracture, vertebral fracture, wrist fracture, other osteoporotic fracture, post-hip fracture, post-vertebral fracture, and death. Recent local data were used as inputs for the model parameters. A discount rate of 4.5% was applied to both costs and outcomes. Results: From the perspective of the healthcare system, denosumab was cost-effective or cost-saving compared to all comparators, considering one unit of Korea's gross domestic product per capita, USA dollar (USD) 34,870. Denosumab was cost-saving compared to ibandronate (oral) and raloxifene. Compared to alendronate, denosumab was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 767.10 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The ICER of denosumab vs. ibandronate IV, risedronate, and zoledronate was USD 685.63, USD 1,469.71, USD 4,668.53 per QALY, respectively. Conclusions: The findings of this analysis suggest that denosumab is a cost-effective therapeutic option for preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in South Korea.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis is a progressive skeletal disease associated with an increased risk of bone fracture. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab for osteoporotic fracture prevention compared to bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) in a cohort of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods: A Markov model was used to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of denosumab versus comparators. The model had a cycle length of 6 months and was run from the age of 68 years to individual patients' lifetime or the age of 100 years. The health states considered in the model were well, hip fracture, vertebral fracture, wrist fracture, other osteoporotic fracture, post-hip fracture, post-vertebral fracture, and death. Recent local data were used as inputs for the model parameters. A discount rate of 4.5% was applied to both costs and outcomes. Results: From the perspective of the healthcare system, denosumab was cost-effective or cost-saving compared to all comparators, considering one unit of Korea's gross domestic product per capita, USA dollar (USD) 34,870. Denosumab was cost-saving compared to ibandronate (oral) and raloxifene. Compared to alendronate, denosumab was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 767.10 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The ICER of denosumab vs. ibandronate IV, risedronate, and zoledronate was USD 685.63, USD 1,469.71, USD 4,668.53 per QALY, respectively. Conclusions: The findings of this analysis suggest that denosumab is a cost-effective therapeutic option for preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in South Korea.
참고문헌 (47)
- McNamara LM, "Perspective on post-menopausal osteoporosis : establishing an interdisciplinary understanding of the sequence of events from the molecular level to whole bone fractures", J R Soc Interface, 7, pp.353~372 (2010)[DOI]
- "Healthcare bigdata hub: Disease subdivision statistics 2019-2021" (2022)[URL]
- Lips P, "Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis : the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis", Osteoporos Int, 7, pp.36~38 (1997)[DOI]
- Lips P, "Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis", Osteoporos Int, 16, pp.447~455 (2005)[DOI]
- 안승희, "Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fracture Fact Sheet in Korea", 대한골대사학회지, 27(4), pp.281~290 (2020), 대한골대사학회
- 유준일, "Incidence and Mortality of Osteoporotic Refractures in Korea according to Nationwide Claims Data", Yonsei Medical Journal, 60(10), pp.969~975 (2019), 연세대학교의과대학[DOI]
- Policy brief for osteoporosis management in super-aged society, "Korean Society for Bone Mineral Research", Korean Society for Bone Mineral Research, ~ (2020)
- Jackson M, "Estimating the future clinical and economic benefits of improving osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment among women in South Korea : a simulation projection model from 2020 to 2040", Arch Osteoporos, 16, pp.115~ (2021)[DOI]
- Cummings SR, "Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis", N Engl J Med, 361, pp.756~765 (2009)[DOI]
- Bone HG, "10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis : results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension", Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 5, pp.513~523 (2017)[DOI]
- "Amgen 'Prolia®', Expanding health insurance coverage as first-line therapy for osteoporosis" (2019)[URL]
- "Prolia dominates the osteoporosis drug market" (2021)[URL]
- Jönsson B, "Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis", Osteoporos Int, 22, pp.967~982 (2011)[DOI]
- Sonnenberg FA, "Markov models in medical decision making : a practical guide", Med Decis Making, 13, pp.322~338 (1993)[DOI]
- Edejer TT, "Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis", World Health Organization, ~ (2003)
- 배그린, "폐경기 골다공증 환자에서 데노수맙 사용에 대한 비용-효과 분석", 한국임상약학회지, 28(2), pp.131~137 (2018), 한국임상약학회[DOI]
- Chau D, "Cost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Canada", J Med Econ, 15(Suppl 1), pp.3~14 (2012)[DOI]
- Trends in osteoporosis treatment and incidence of osteoporotic fracture in Korea, "Noh SH", National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, ~ (2021)
- 장선미, "골다공증 환자의 의료이용 양상", Endocrinology and Metabolism, 25(4), pp.326~339 (2010), 대한내분비학회
- Lee YK, "Mortality after vertebral fracture in Korea : analysis of the National Claim Registry", Osteoporos Int, 23, pp.1859~1865 (2012)[DOI]
- 윤현구, "Incidence and Mortality Following Hip Fracture in Korea", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 26(8), pp.1087~1092 (2011), 대한의학회
- Barrett JA, "Mortality and pulmonary embolism after fracture in the elderly", Osteoporos Int, 14, pp.889~894 (2003)[DOI]
- Kanis JA, "The burden of osteoporotic fractures : a method for setting intervention thresholds", Osteoporos Int, 12, pp.417~427 (2001)[DOI]
- Kanis JA, "The cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the management of osteoporosis", Bone, 42, pp.4~15 (2008)[DOI]
- "Foreign exchange rate" (2022)[URL]
- Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, "Pharmaceutical economic evaluation guidelines", Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, ~ (2021)
- "Healthcare bigdata hub: Disease classification (stage 3) statistics" (2021)[URL]
- Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, "Fee-for-service price 2020", Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, ~ (2020)
- Status report of healthcare coverage, "National Health Insurance Service", National Health Insurance Service, ~ (2019)
- Korean National Health Insurance Service, "Drug reimbursement price ceiling table", Korean National Health Insurance Service, ~ (2021)
- Korean National Health Insurance Service, "Weighted-average drug price table", Korean National Health Insurance Service, ~ (2021)
- "Consumer price index" (2020)[URL]
- Barrionuevo P, "Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women : A network meta-analysis", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 104, pp.1623~1630 (2019)[DOI]
- Freemantle N, "Results of indirect and mixed treatment comparison of fracture efficacy for osteoporosis treatments : a meta-analysis", Osteoporos Int, 24, pp.209~217 (2013)[DOI]
- Li L, "Persistence with osteoporosis medications among postmenopausal women in the UK General Practice Research Database", Menopause, 19, pp.33~40 (2012)[DOI]
- Mori T, "Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan", Osteoporos Int, 28, pp.1733~1744 (2017)[DOI]
- Hiligsmann M, "Cost effectiveness of denosumab compared with oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporotic women in Belgium", Pharmacoeconomics, 29, pp.895~911 (2011)[DOI]
- Karnon J, "What are we paying for? A cost-effectiveness analysis of patented denosumab and generic alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in Australia", Cost EffResour Alloc, 14, pp.11~ (2016)[DOI]
- Parthan A, "Cost effectiveness of denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis in the US", Appl Health Econ Health Policy, 11, pp.485~497 (2013)[DOI]
- Ström O, "Intervention thresholds for denosumab in the UK using a FRAX®-based cost-effectiveness analysis", Osteoporos Int, 24, pp.1491~1502 (2013)[DOI]
- Park JH, "Compliance and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 18, pp.152~ (2017)[DOI]
- Imaz I, "Poor bisphosphonate adherence for treatment of osteoporosis increases fracture risk : systematic review and meta-analysis", Osteoporos Int, 21, pp.1943~1951 (2010)[DOI]
- "Fosamax tab (Alendronate sodium)" (2008)[URL]
- "Prolia® Pre-filled syringe (Denosumab)" (2014)[URL]
- Mosca L, "Effect of raloxifene on stroke and venous thromboembolism according to subgroups in postmenopausal women at increased risk of coronary heart disease", Stroke, 40, pp.147~155 (2009)[DOI]
- Biju Benjamin, "Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis", Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia, 2(2), pp.77~81 (2016), 대한골다공증학회[DOI]
- Lyu H, "Comparison of denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with osteoporosis : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 104, pp.1753~1765 (2019)[DOI]
