Disability Weights for Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fractures in South Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Korea is expected to become an ultra-aged society, in which the elderly population will account for more than 20% of the total population, after 2025. Thus, the social costs due to osteoporotic fractures are expected to increase. Therefore, this study aimed to measure disability weights (DWs) of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in Korea. Methods: The scenarios were developed to standardize the severity of 6 health statuses: osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures including wrist, hip, post-hip, vertebral, and post-vertebral fracture. The values for these 6 health statuses were sought via a person trade-off (PTO) approach. We measured the value by PTO and we calculated it to DW of 6 health statuses. Three clinical expertise panels of 33 experts were established, and face-to-face interviews were conducted from July to December 2017. Results: The distribution of DW varied by panel. DWs ranged from 0.5 (Osteoporosis) to 0.857 (Hip fracture) for Panel 1, 0.091 (Osteoporosis) to 0.5 (Hip fracture) for Panel 2, and 0.091 (Osteoporosis) to 0.726 (Hip fracture) for Panel 3. The final values for the 6 health statuses obtained by pooling all data from 3 panels ranged from 0.286 (Osteoporosis) to 0.750 (Hip fracture). There was no significant difference in rankings for the 6 health statuses among the 3 panels. Conclusions: Comparing the DW of osteoporotic fracture in this study with other diseases in previous studies, it is predicted that osteoporotic fractures, especially hip fractures, will have a considerable burden of disease.
Abstract
Background: Korea is expected to become an ultra-aged society, in which the elderly population will account for more than 20% of the total population, after 2025. Thus, the social costs due to osteoporotic fractures are expected to increase. Therefore, this study aimed to measure disability weights (DWs) of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in Korea. Methods: The scenarios were developed to standardize the severity of 6 health statuses: osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures including wrist, hip, post-hip, vertebral, and post-vertebral fracture. The values for these 6 health statuses were sought via a person trade-off (PTO) approach. We measured the value by PTO and we calculated it to DW of 6 health statuses. Three clinical expertise panels of 33 experts were established, and face-to-face interviews were conducted from July to December 2017. Results: The distribution of DW varied by panel. DWs ranged from 0.5 (Osteoporosis) to 0.857 (Hip fracture) for Panel 1, 0.091 (Osteoporosis) to 0.5 (Hip fracture) for Panel 2, and 0.091 (Osteoporosis) to 0.726 (Hip fracture) for Panel 3. The final values for the 6 health statuses obtained by pooling all data from 3 panels ranged from 0.286 (Osteoporosis) to 0.750 (Hip fracture). There was no significant difference in rankings for the 6 health statuses among the 3 panels. Conclusions: Comparing the DW of osteoporotic fracture in this study with other diseases in previous studies, it is predicted that osteoporotic fractures, especially hip fractures, will have a considerable burden of disease.
참고문헌 (30)
- Lee JW, "Reducing suicide of the elderly and futures of aged society", Future Res, 2, pp.99~123 (2017)
- Ha YC, "Current trends and future projections of hip fracture in South Korea using nationwide claims data", Osteoporos Int, 27, pp.2603~2609 (2016)
- Kim J, "Economic burden of osteoporotic fracture of the elderly in South Korea: a national survey", Value Health Reg Issues, 9, pp.36~41 (2016)
- Kirk MD, "World Health Organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: a data synthesis", PLoS Med, 12, pp.e1001921~ (2015)
- Nord E, "An alternative to QALYs: the saved young life equivalent (SAVE)", BMJ, 305, pp.875~877 (1992)
- Nord E, "Social evaluation of health care versus personal evaluation of health states. Evidence on the validity of four health-state scaling instruments using Norwegian and Australian surveys", Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 9, pp.463~478 (1993)
- Nord E, "The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programs", Med Decis Making, 15, pp.201~208 (1995)
- Yoon SJ, "Estimation of attributable burden due to premature death from smoking in Korea", Korean J Prev Med, 34, pp.191~199 (2001)
- Lee TJ, "Estimation of disability-adjusted life years of major cardiovascular diseases in", Korean Health Econ Rev, 8, pp.91~106 (2002)
- Jo J, "Alcohol-related years of potential life lost in Korea", J Health Info Stat, 28, pp.40~56 (2003)
- Lee JK, "Measuring the burden of diseases due to alcohol consumption in Korea", master's, pp.2004
- 박재현, "우리나라 국민의 정신질환으로 인한 질병부담 추정", 예방의학회지, 39(1), pp.39~45 (2006), 대한예방의학회
- 이채은, "노인의 사회계층간 질병부담격차", 보건행정학회지, 18(4), pp.1~17 (2008), 한국보건행정학회
- Kim SJ, "Burden of disease due to COPD", master’s, pp.2009
- 신호성, "기후변화와 연령특성이 장염 발생에 미치는 영향", 보건사회연구, 35(1), pp.186~210 (2015), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- Murray CJ, "Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study", Lancet, 349, pp.1498~1504 (1997)
- Lim SS, "comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010", Lancet, 380, pp.2224~2260 (2012)
- 이중규, "한국인 질병의 장애가중치 측정 및 신뢰도 평가", 예방의학회지, 36(2), pp.10~170 (2003), 대한예방의학회
- Wittrup-Jensen K, "An empirical assessment of the person trade-off: Valuation of health, framing effects, and estimation of weights for fairness" (2008), Syddansk Universitet
- Patrick DL, "Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index", Health Serv Res, 8, pp.228~245 (1973)
- Stouthard MEA, "Disability weights for diseases: a modified protocol and results for a Western European region", Eur J Public Health, 10, pp.24~30 (2000)
- Mansley EC, "Preferences and person trade-offs: forcing consistency or inconsistency in health-related quality of life measures?", Health Econ, 12, pp.187~198 (2003)
- Burden of Disease Unit, "Harvard School of Public Health. Measuring disability weights for a national burden of disease study using the person-trade-off method: a revised protocol" (1996), Harvard School of Public Health
- Murray CJL, "global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020: Summary" (1996), World Health Organization
- Salomon JA, "Disability weights for the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study", Lancet Glob Health, 3, pp.e712~e723 (2015)
- Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators, "Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013", Lancet, 386, pp.743~800 (2015)
- Murray CJ, "GBD 2010: design, definitions, and metrics", Lancet, 380, pp.2063~2066 (2012)
- Bertram M, "Review of the long-term disability associated with hip fractures", Inj Prev, 17, pp.365~370 (2011)
- Papadimitriou N, "Burden of hip fracture using disability-adjusted life-years: a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts in the CHANCES consortium", Lancet Public Health, 2, pp.e239~e246 (2017)
- 도영경, "한국인 질병의 장애가중치 측정에 관한 연구 : 호주 장애가중치와의 측정 결과 비교를 중심으로", 예방의학회지, 37(1), pp.59~71 (2004), 대한예방의학회