한국의 환자 중심 의사 역량 프레임 타당화를 위한 델파이 연구
A Delphi Study to Validate the Patient-Centered Doctor’s Competency Framework in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Defining a competent doctor is important for educating and training doctors. However, competency frameworks have rarely been validated during the process of their development in Korea. The purpose of this study was to validate the patient-centered doctor’s competency framework, which had been developed by our expert working group (EWG). Two rounds of Delphi questionnaire surveys were conducted among a panel of experts on medicine and medical education. The panel members were provided with six core competencies, 17 sub-competencies, and 53 enabling competencies, and were asked to rate the importance of these competencies on a 5-point Likert scale. Between April and July 2021, a total of 28 experts completed both rounds. The data of the Delphi study were analyzed for the mean, standard deviation, median, inter-rater agreement (IRA), and content validity ratio (CVR). A CVR >0.36 and IRA ≥0.75 were deemed to indicate validity and agreement. This study found that five enabling competencies were not valid, and agreement was not reached for three sub-competencies and two enabling competencies. In consideration of CVR and the individual opinions of panel members at each session, the final competencies were extracted through consensus meetings of the EWG. The competencies were modified into six core competencies, 16 sub-competencies, and 47 enabling competencies. This study is meaningful in that it proposes patient-centered doctor’s competencies enabling the development of residents’ milestone competencies, an assessment system, and educational programs.
Abstract
Defining a competent doctor is important for educating and training doctors. However, competency frameworks have rarely been validated during the process of their development in Korea. The purpose of this study was to validate the patient-centered doctor’s competency framework, which had been developed by our expert working group (EWG). Two rounds of Delphi questionnaire surveys were conducted among a panel of experts on medicine and medical education. The panel members were provided with six core competencies, 17 sub-competencies, and 53 enabling competencies, and were asked to rate the importance of these competencies on a 5-point Likert scale. Between April and July 2021, a total of 28 experts completed both rounds. The data of the Delphi study were analyzed for the mean, standard deviation, median, inter-rater agreement (IRA), and content validity ratio (CVR). A CVR >0.36 and IRA ≥0.75 were deemed to indicate validity and agreement. This study found that five enabling competencies were not valid, and agreement was not reached for three sub-competencies and two enabling competencies. In consideration of CVR and the individual opinions of panel members at each session, the final competencies were extracted through consensus meetings of the EWG. The competencies were modified into six core competencies, 16 sub-competencies, and 47 enabling competencies. This study is meaningful in that it proposes patient-centered doctor’s competencies enabling the development of residents’ milestone competencies, an assessment system, and educational programs.
참고문헌 (29)
- Susan R. Swing, "The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective", Medical Teacher, 29(7), pp.648~654 (2007), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Frank JR, "CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework", The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, ~ (2015)
- Good medical practice, "General Medical Council", General Medical Council, ~ (2020)
- Development of generic curriculum for graduate medical education, "Lee MS", Research Institute for Healthcare Policy, Korea Medical Association, ~ (2010)
- A study on the reorganization of the training curriculum for efficient training of the residents, "Kim JJ", Ministry of Health and Welfare, ~ (2013)
- "Announcement of partial revision of annual training curriculum for residents" (2019)[URL]
- 김형준, "정신건강의학과 수련교육의 질과 임상역량에 대한 전공의와 전문의의 인식도 조사", 신경정신의학, 59(2), pp.148~158 (2020), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
- Sung Geun Kim, "New start of surgical residents training: the first survey of program directors in Korea", BMC Medical Education, 19(1), pp.208~ (2019), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- A study on role of Korea’s doctors, "Ahn DS", Ministry of Health and Welfare, ~ (2013)
- Thomas J. Nasca, "The Next GME Accreditation System — Rationale and Benefits", New England Journal of Medicine, 366(11), pp.1051~1056 (2012), Massachusetts Medical Society[DOI]
- Frank JR, "Draft CanMEDS 2015 milestones guide", The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, ~ (2014)
- 전우택, "새로운 한국형 의사 전문역량 틀 개발", 의학교육논단, 24(2), pp.77~78 (2022), 연세대학교 의과대학
- 전우택, "한국의 환자중심 의사 역량 연구", 의학교육논단, 24(2), pp.79~92 (2022), 연세대학교 의과대학
- 김영전, "텍스트네트워크 분석을 활용한 국내 의사 직무역량 연구동향 분석", 의학교육논단, 24(2), pp.93~102 (2022), 연세대학교 의과대학
- 정한나, "신문기사 키워드 분석(2016–2020년)을 통한 의사 및 의료에 대한 사회적 요구 분석", 의학교육논단, 24(2), pp.103~112 (2022), 연세대학교 의과대학
- Kim C, "Social accountability in medical education", Proceedings of the Korean Medical Education Conference 2022 of The Korean Society of Medical Education (2022), Korean Society of Medical Education
- Yune S, "A study on the patient-centered doctor’s competency in Korea: Korean doctor’s competency as perceived by citizens and medical professionals", Proceedings of the Korean Medical Education Conference 2022 of The Korean Society of Medical Education (2022), Korean Society of Medical Education
- Susan Humphrey-Murto, "Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research", Medical Teacher, 39(1), pp.14~19 (2016), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Felicity Hasson, "Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), pp.1008~1015 (2000), Wiley[DOI]
- C. H. LAWSHE, "A quantitative approach to content validity", Personnel Psychology, 28(4), pp.563~575 (1975), Wiley[DOI]
- Yaszay B, "ACGME core competencies : where are we?", Orthopedics, 32(3), pp.171~ (2009)
- Brenda J Stutsky, "Determining the weighting and relative importance of CanMEDS roles and competencies", BMC Research Notes, 5(1), pp.354~ (2012), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Jany J D J M Rademakers, "Senior medical students' appraisal of CanMEDS competencies", Medical Education, 41(10), pp.990~994 (2007), Wiley[DOI]
- Suzanne Boroumand, "Addressing the health advocate role in medical education", BMC Medical Education, 20(1), pp.28~ (2020), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Michelle Daniel, "An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 64", Medical Teacher, 43(3), pp.253~271 (2021), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Michail Papapanou, "Medical education challenges and innovations during COVID-19 pandemic", Postgraduate Medical Journal, 98(1159), pp.321~327 (2021), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- Viren Kaul, "Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic", Chest, 159(5), pp.1949~1960 (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Christina M. Cutter, "Accountability to Population Health in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Designing Health Care Delivery Within a Social Responsibility Framework", Population Health Management, 24(1), pp.3~5 (2021), Mary Ann Liebert Inc[DOI]
- Erica Nelson, "Social accountability and health systems’ change, beyond the shock of Covid-19: drawing on histories of technical and activist approaches to rethink a shared code of practice", International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(S1), pp.41~ (2022), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]