학생지원체계 개선을 위한 학생주도 교육평가 사례
Student Engagement in Student Support System Reform: A Case Study
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Educational evaluation involves data collection and the analysis of various education-related factors to make decisions that improve educational quality. Systematic educational evaluation is essential for enhancing the quality of education. This study reports a case of student-conducted process evaluation of a medical school’s student support system and the procedure for devising improvement plans. Sixteen Inje University College of Medicine students participated in the Education Evaluation Committee (IUCM-EEC) to understand the educational improvement process as learners and actively achieve improvement. The Quality Improvement Committee of the Inje University College of Medicine (IUCM-QIC) decided to reform its student support system based on a previous educational evaluation in 2019. The evaluation of the student support system was conducted for 10 months in 2021 by the student subcommittee, under the guidance of the IUCM-EEC. The CIPP (context-input-process-product) evaluation model was used for a systematic evaluation. Accordingly, the subcommittee developed evaluation criteria and indicators, and analyzed relevant data collected from surveys and the previous literature. For further recommendations and revision ideas, the student subcommittee members interviewed faculty members from six other medical schools and also conducted a focus group interview with the dean and vice deans of IUCM. Finally, the student subcommittee submitted a report to the IUCM-QIC. Communication with various stakeholders is essential for a successful evaluation process. In this case, students, as key stakeholders in education, evaluated the student support system. Their active participation helped improve their understanding of the evaluation process.
Abstract
Educational evaluation involves data collection and the analysis of various education-related factors to make decisions that improve educational quality. Systematic educational evaluation is essential for enhancing the quality of education. This study reports a case of student-conducted process evaluation of a medical school’s student support system and the procedure for devising improvement plans. Sixteen Inje University College of Medicine students participated in the Education Evaluation Committee (IUCM-EEC) to understand the educational improvement process as learners and actively achieve improvement. The Quality Improvement Committee of the Inje University College of Medicine (IUCM-QIC) decided to reform its student support system based on a previous educational evaluation in 2019. The evaluation of the student support system was conducted for 10 months in 2021 by the student subcommittee, under the guidance of the IUCM-EEC. The CIPP (context-input-process-product) evaluation model was used for a systematic evaluation. Accordingly, the subcommittee developed evaluation criteria and indicators, and analyzed relevant data collected from surveys and the previous literature. For further recommendations and revision ideas, the student subcommittee members interviewed faculty members from six other medical schools and also conducted a focus group interview with the dean and vice deans of IUCM. Finally, the student subcommittee submitted a report to the IUCM-QIC. Communication with various stakeholders is essential for a successful evaluation process. In this case, students, as key stakeholders in education, evaluated the student support system. Their active participation helped improve their understanding of the evaluation process.
참고문헌 (14)
- Ann W. Frye, "Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67", Medical Teacher, 34(5), pp.e288~e299 (2012), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- 주현정, "역량바탕의학교육을 촉진하기 위한 교육평가: 통합평가모형 적용", 의학교육논단, 23(1), pp.56~67 (2021), 연세대학교 의과대학[DOI]
- Herman Hay Ming Lo, "Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Health and Social Care Education: a Cohort-Controlled Study", Mindfulness, 12(8), pp.2050~2058 (2021), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Chayamai Hathaisaard, "Mindfulness-based interventions reducing and preventing stress and burnout in medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis", Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 69, pp.102997~ (2022), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Robert Shochet, "Defining Learning Communities in Undergraduate Medical Education: A National Study", Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 6, pp.238212051982791~ (2019), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Joseph R. Geraghty, "Empowering medical students as agents of curricular change: a value-added approach to student engagement in medical education", Perspectives on Medical Education, 9(1), pp.60~65 (2019), Ubiquity Press, Ltd[DOI]
- Lennart Steffen Milles, "Student engagement in medical education: A mixed-method study on medical students as module co-directors in curriculum development", Medical Teacher, 41(10), pp.1143~1150 (2019), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- "Accreditation Standards of Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019" (2023)[URL]
- Educational evaluation report of Student support system, "Education Evaluation Committee", Inje University College of Medicine, 233~ (2022)
- Stufflebeam DL, "International handbook of educational evaluation", pp.31~61 (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Stufflebeam DL, "The CIPP evaluation model: how to evaluate for improvement and accountability", pp.384~ (2017), The Guilford Press
- 허예라, "우리에게는 어떠한 멘토링이 필요한가? 의과대학생을 위한 멘토링 프로그램의 연구동향 고찰", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 25(1), pp.5~13 (2013), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
- 김지영, "의과대학 소그룹 지도 프로그램 운영의 사례연구: SNU 학습멘토링, 피어튜터링, 학습코칭, 의학연구 멘토링 프로그램을 중심으로", 의학교육논단, 14(2), pp.78~85 (2012), 연세대학교 의과대학
- Jeon UT, "A new search for medical school student learning and life guidance: focusing on the 2005 student counseling case", Korean Med Educ Rev, 8(1), pp.23~33 (2006)[DOI]