소절의 내적구조 분석 및 교육적 함의
An Analysis of Internal Structure on Small Clause and Educational Entailment
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to analyze the internal structure of the small clause and has made investigation about understanding degree of the small clause. Also, another purpose of this paper is to analyze the educational entailment of small clause in English Grammar. There are three clauses, ordinary clause, exceptional clause, small clause, in English. Clause follows this structure, S'→COMP S, S→NP INFL VP. Therefore, small clause is a kind of clause, but it does not have INFL and copular in Government-Binding Theory. And small clause has two types. One is an adjunct small clause and the other is a complement small clause. The adjunct small clause is not subcategorized and is thematically independent, but the complement small clause is subcategorized and isn't thematically independent. As a matter of fact, small clause is not simple as the traditional grammar. Many English learners think small clause is very difficult and a kind of different sentence. They think that [O+OC] of [S+V+[O+OC]] is a small clause. Even though [S+V+[O+OC]] is a correct sentence, it is different from a small clause. Small clause must be considered a sentence to many English learners. However, the proper syntactic treatment of small clauses remains a matter of considerable debate and complexity. First of all, many English learners must understand the terms of small clause. There aren't many sentences having a small clause on the middle textbooks. So, they don't understand a small clause completely. In conclusion, small clause has to be considered a kind of sentence and used in writing and speaking more often to Middle School English learners.
Abstract
This study is to analyze the internal structure of the small clause and has made investigation about understanding degree of the small clause. Also, another purpose of this paper is to analyze the educational entailment of small clause in English Grammar. There are three clauses, ordinary clause, exceptional clause, small clause, in English. Clause follows this structure, S'→COMP S, S→NP INFL VP. Therefore, small clause is a kind of clause, but it does not have INFL and copular in Government-Binding Theory. And small clause has two types. One is an adjunct small clause and the other is a complement small clause. The adjunct small clause is not subcategorized and is thematically independent, but the complement small clause is subcategorized and isn't thematically independent. As a matter of fact, small clause is not simple as the traditional grammar. Many English learners think small clause is very difficult and a kind of different sentence. They think that [O+OC] of [S+V+[O+OC]] is a small clause. Even though [S+V+[O+OC]] is a correct sentence, it is different from a small clause. Small clause must be considered a sentence to many English learners. However, the proper syntactic treatment of small clauses remains a matter of considerable debate and complexity. First of all, many English learners must understand the terms of small clause. There aren't many sentences having a small clause on the middle textbooks. So, they don't understand a small clause completely. In conclusion, small clause has to be considered a kind of sentence and used in writing and speaking more often to Middle School English learners.
참고문헌 (39)
- 김성종, "영어의 소절 연구", 영어영문학연구, 48(1), pp.17~46 (2006), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 김영현, "영어의 소절구문 연구", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.1992
- 김충배, "MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH 1" (2011), 중앙교육진흥연구소
- 김충배, "MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH 2" (2011), 중앙교육진흥연구소
- 김충배, "MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH 1" (2011), 중앙교육진흥연구소
- 배영남, "5형식 문형 이론과 영어 문법 교육", 언어과학연구, 24, pp.83~110 (2003), 언어과학회
- 서하석, "소절구조의 술어분석", 언어학, 12(2), pp.97~113 (2004), 대한언어학회
- 양용준, "소절구조 유형 및 분석", 언어학, 12(2), pp.115~143 (2004), 대한언어학회
- 이연화, "영어의 명사구 소절과 통사구조", 언어연구, 18(2), pp.11~222 (2002), 한국현대언어학회
- 이인기, "MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH 1" (2012), 천재교육
- 이인기, "MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH 2" (2012), 천재교육
- 이인기, "MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH 3" (2012), 천재교육
- 이인기, "MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH 1 ACTIVITIES" (2012), 천재교육
- 이인기, "MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH 2 ACTIVITIES" (2012), 천재교육
- 이인기, "MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH 3 ACTIVITIES" (2012), 천재교육
- 유귀열, "영어의 작은절과 이차적 서술관계", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.1992
- Aarts, Bas, "Small Clauses in English" (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
- Basilico, D., "The Topic of Small Clauses", Linguistic Inquiry, 34(1), pp.1~35 (2003)
- Bowers, John, "Predication, In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory" (2001)
- Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy", 석사, pp.2001
- Jespersen, O, "The Philosophy of Grammar, In George Allen & Unwin.(1924) Rpt" (1924), Norton
- Jespersen, O., "Analytic Syntax" (1969), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, INC
- Kitagawa, Y, "Small but Clausal", Chicago Linguistic Society, 21, pp.210~220 (1985)
- Kitagawa, Y., "Subjects in Japanese and English", pp.1986
- Kuroda, "Whether You Agree or Not: Rough Ideas about the Comparative Grammar of English and Japanese", pp.1985
- Marantz A., "On the Nature of Grammatical Relations" (1984), MIT Press
- Ouhalla, Jamal, "Introducing Transformational Grammar" (1999), Oxford Univ. Press
- Radford, A., "Transformational Grammar" (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Radford, A., "Syntactic theory and the structure of English" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Rothstein, S., "The Syntactic Forms of Predication", pp.1983
- Rothstein, S, "Small Clause Reconstructing in Principle and Parameters, In Comparative Grammar" (1995), MIT press
- Rouveret, Alain, "Specifying Reference to the Subject: French Causatives and Conditions on Representations", L1, 11, pp.97~202 (1980)
- Stowell, Tim, "Origins of phrase structure" (1981), MIT Press
- Stowell, Tim, "Subjects across categories", The Linguistic Review, 2, pp.285~312 (1983)
- Stowell, Tim, "Subjects, Specifiers, and X'-Theory, In Alternative Concepts of phrase Structure", pp.232~262 (1989), The University of Chicago Press
- Zubizarreta, M-L., "On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax", pp.1982