본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of the Concept EAT as a Metaphorical Source in Korean and English

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The paper compares the concept EAT in Korean and English regarding which of the four stages of the eating process - intake, mastication, swallowing, and digestion - is most frequently utilized in metaphorical conceptualization. In Choi (2017), it has been revealed that in English, the mastication stage is most highly perspectivized, based on the investigation of the corpus COCA. The most commonly observed metaphorical meanings are, therefore, related to the mastication stage: 'to bother,' 'to destroy,' and 'to eliminate as the result of the destruction.' Based on the previous findings, this paper examines the same concept EAT in Korean through the corpus of NIKL (National Institute of the Korean Language). The result shows that, in Korean, the intake stage is the most frequently used in metaphors, and thus the most common metaphorical meanings are 'to accept,' 'to add,' and 'to possess.' While the two languages highlight different stages of eating in metaphorical conceptualization, they are similar in that they both focus on the negative aspects of the concept EAT in metaphors. In English, negative meanings related to the destructive nature of the mastication stage are most frequently observed. In Korean, the negative aspects of the intake stage are emphasized in meanings such as 'to possess immorally' and 'to experience something bad.'

Abstract

The paper compares the concept EAT in Korean and English regarding which of the four stages of the eating process - intake, mastication, swallowing, and digestion - is most frequently utilized in metaphorical conceptualization. In Choi (2017), it has been revealed that in English, the mastication stage is most highly perspectivized, based on the investigation of the corpus COCA. The most commonly observed metaphorical meanings are, therefore, related to the mastication stage: 'to bother,' 'to destroy,' and 'to eliminate as the result of the destruction.' Based on the previous findings, this paper examines the same concept EAT in Korean through the corpus of NIKL (National Institute of the Korean Language). The result shows that, in Korean, the intake stage is the most frequently used in metaphors, and thus the most common metaphorical meanings are 'to accept,' 'to add,' and 'to possess.' While the two languages highlight different stages of eating in metaphorical conceptualization, they are similar in that they both focus on the negative aspects of the concept EAT in metaphors. In English, negative meanings related to the destructive nature of the mastication stage are most frequently observed. In Korean, the negative aspects of the intake stage are emphasized in meanings such as 'to possess immorally' and 'to experience something bad.'

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Alverson, H, "Semantics and experience: Universal metaphors of time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho" (1994), Johns Hopkins University Press
  2. Boers, F, "Metaphor in cognitive linguistics", pp.45~56 (1999), John Benjamins
  3. Boers, F, "Applied linguistics perspectives on cross-cultural variation in conceptual metaphor", Metaphor and Symbol, 18, pp.231~238 (2003)
  4. 최영주, "The Concept EAT as a Metaphorical Source in English", 언어학, 25(2), pp.1~21 (2017), 대한언어학회[DOI]
  5. Deignan, A, "Researching and applying metaphor", pp.177~199 (1999), CUP
  6. Deignan, A, "Metaphor and corpus linguistics" (2005), John Benjamins
  7. Deignan, A, "Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy", pp.106~122 (2006), Walter de Gruyter
  8. Deignan, A, "A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms in English and Italian", Paper presented at the Third Seminar on Researching and Applying Metaphor (1999), University of Tilburg
  9. Kövecses, Z, "Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  10. Kövecses, Z, "Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction" (2006), Oxford University Press
  11. Kövecses, Z, "Metaphor, language, and culture", DELTA, 26, pp.719~738 (2010)
  12. Lakoff, G, "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
  13. Newman, J, "Eating and drinking as sources of metaphor in English", Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa, 6, pp.213~231 (1997)
  14. Newman, J, "The linguistics of eating and drinking", pp.1~26 (2009), John Benjamins
  15. Riddle, E, "The “string” metaphor of life and language in Hmong", Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference (2001)
  16. Stefanowitsch, A, "Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy", pp.1~16 (2006), Walter de Gruyter
  17. Yu, N, "Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in Chinese and English", Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, pp.59~92 (1995)
  18. Yu, N, "The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese" (1998), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)