The Syntactic and Phonological Interface of English Pied-piping Structure
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explores the interaction between syntax and phonology, focusing on pied-piping and preposition stranding within linguistic interfaces. Since the 1990s, research has increasingly examined how syntactic movements influence prosodic patterns. Generative grammarians (e.g., Chomsky 1995) suggest that pied-piping reflects the interaction between syntactic and phonological constraints, advocating principles of economy. By applying phase theory and the prosodic hierarchy hypothesis, this paper analyzes pied-piping structures to understand their alignment with prosodic patterns. Recent studies on the syntax-phonology interface reveal that intonation shifts in pied-piping may signify different pragmatic intentions, such as formality, when compared to preposition stranding. Additionally, Elfner (2017) emphasizes that prosodic structures can serve as diagnostics for syntactic structures. Rather than treating syntax and phonology as independent domains, this research argues for their dynamic interaction, influencing both word order and prosody.
Abstract
This study explores the interaction between syntax and phonology, focusing on pied-piping and preposition stranding within linguistic interfaces. Since the 1990s, research has increasingly examined how syntactic movements influence prosodic patterns. Generative grammarians (e.g., Chomsky 1995) suggest that pied-piping reflects the interaction between syntactic and phonological constraints, advocating principles of economy. By applying phase theory and the prosodic hierarchy hypothesis, this paper analyzes pied-piping structures to understand their alignment with prosodic patterns. Recent studies on the syntax-phonology interface reveal that intonation shifts in pied-piping may signify different pragmatic intentions, such as formality, when compared to preposition stranding. Additionally, Elfner (2017) emphasizes that prosodic structures can serve as diagnostics for syntactic structures. Rather than treating syntax and phonology as independent domains, this research argues for their dynamic interaction, influencing both word order and prosody.
참고문헌 (38)
- Adger, D, "Core syntax : A minimalist Approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Bergh, G., "Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English", pp.39~58 (2000), John Benjamins
- Bolinger, D, "Intonation and its uses" (1989), Stanford University Press
- Bresnan, J., "On the form and function of transformations", Linguistic Inquiry, 7(1), pp.3~40 (1976)
- Büring, D, "Information structure: Theoretical, typological, and experimental perspectives", pp.177~205 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Cable, S, "The grammar of Q: Q-particles, wh-movement, and pied-piping" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Cable, S., "Against the existence of pied-piping : Evidence from Tlingit", Linguistic Inquiry, 41(3), pp.563~594 (2010)
- Chomsky, N., "The sound pattern of English" (1968), Harper & Row
- Chomsky, N, "A festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~286 (1973), Holt, Reinhart and Winston
- Chomsky, N, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Cowper, E., "Pied piping, feature percolation and the structure of the noun phrase", Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 32(1), pp.321~338 (1987)
- Elfner, E., "The syntax-prosody interface : Current theoretical approaches and outstanding questions", Linguistics Vanguard, 4(1), pp.1~14 (2018)
- Féry, C., "Focus as prosodic alignment", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 31(3), pp.683~734 (2013)
- Grimshaw, J, "Lexical specification and insertion", pp.115~133 (2000), John Benjamins
- Heck, F, "On pied-piping : Wh-movement and beyond" (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
- Horváth, J, "Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation in honor of Joseph E. Emonds", pp.73~104 (2007), John Benjamins
- Ito, J., "Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk", pp.280~303 (2012), Equinox Publishing
- Kenstowicz, M, "Topics in phonological theory" (1977), Academic Press
- Kim, Young-Sun, "Prosodic effects on preposition stranding", Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 8(4), pp.547~573 (2008)
- Ladd, D. R, "The structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English" (1980), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Nespor, M., "Prosodic phonology" (1986), Foris
- Radford, A, "Minimalist syntax : Exploring the structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Richards, N, "Contiguity theory" (2016), MIT Press
- Ross, J. R, "Infinite syntax" (1986), Ablex Publishing Corporation
- Sag, I, "Deletion and logical form", Doctor, pp.1977
- Schmerling, S, "Aspects of English sentence stress" (1976), University of Texas Press
- Selkirk, E. O, "Phonology and syntax" (1984), MIT Press
- Selkirk, E. O, "The handbook of phonological theory", pp.435~484 (2011), Wiley‐Blackwell
- Snyder, W., "On the nature of syntactic variation : Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation", Language, 77(2), pp.324~342 (2001)
- Steedman, M. J, "Surface structure and interpretation" (1997), MIT Press
- Stowell, T, "Origins of phrase structure", Doctor, pp.1981
- Sugisaki, K., "A further challenge to the syntactic bootstrapping hypothesis : The acquisition of scope and binding in child Japanese", Linguistic Inquiry, 42(2), pp.440~446 (2011)
- Tokizaki, H, "Syntactic structure and silence: The syntax-prosody interface" (2010), Hokkaido University Press
- Wagner, M, "The Oxford handbook of information structure", pp.64~85 (2015), Oxford University Press
- Wasow, T, "Anaphora in generative grammar" (1979), E. Story-Scientia
- Webelhuth, G, "Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation" (1992), Oxford University Press
- Williams, E., "Discourse and logical form", Linguistic Inquiry, 17(1), pp.183~212 (1977)
- Zec, D., "The phonology-syntax connection", pp.365~378 (1990), University of Chicago Press