Preposition Stranding, Complementizers, and Phase Extension
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper tries to explain why preposition stranding is allowed in some languages like English but not in others, by extending den Dikken's (2006) phase extension analysis to DP to PP relation. Going through a number of examples with respect to preposition stranding and its relationship with the directionality of movements involved, this paper deals with the question why preposition stranding is different from language to language as well as within a language. By applying den Dikken's (2006) phase extension analysis to preposition stranding examples, this paper supports his theory of phase extension. This paper also deals with the consequences of the proposed analysis with respect to complementizer stranding. By equating C with P (including prepositional complementizer for), a unified account becomes possible to both PP-DP relation and that of CP-TP. The phase extension analysis is also proven to be superior to Fox and Pesetsky's (2005) linearization with respect to preposition stranding.
Abstract
This paper tries to explain why preposition stranding is allowed in some languages like English but not in others, by extending den Dikken's (2006) phase extension analysis to DP to PP relation. Going through a number of examples with respect to preposition stranding and its relationship with the directionality of movements involved, this paper deals with the question why preposition stranding is different from language to language as well as within a language. By applying den Dikken's (2006) phase extension analysis to preposition stranding examples, this paper supports his theory of phase extension. This paper also deals with the consequences of the proposed analysis with respect to complementizer stranding. By equating C with P (including prepositional complementizer for), a unified account becomes possible to both PP-DP relation and that of CP-TP. The phase extension analysis is also proven to be superior to Fox and Pesetsky's (2005) linearization with respect to preposition stranding.
참고문헌 (23)
- Abels, Klaus, "Phase, cyclicity, and stranding. Handout given at the EPP Workshop" (2003), MIT, Cambridge, Mass
- Bo？kovi？, "On the distribution of null complementizers", 33, pp.527~546 (2003)
- Bo？kovi？, "Null C in English as an enclitic" (2005), Ms.,University of Connecticut
- Bo？kovi？, "On Successive Cyclic Movement and the Freezing Effect of Feature Checking" (2007), Ms. University of Connecticut
- Chomsky, Noam, "Approaching UG from below", (am) (2006), Ms., MIT
- Den Dikken, Marcel, "Phase extension" (2006), Ms., New York University
- Doherty, Cathal, "Clauses without ＂That＂" (2001), New York: Garland
- Fox, Danny, "Cyclic linearization of syntactic structures", 31(1-2), pp.1 1~2 46 (2005)
- Grohmann, K.K, "Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies" (2003), Amsterdam: John Benjamins
- Kim, Jeong-Seok, "Syntactic Focus Movement and Ellipsis: A Minimalist Approach" (1997)
- Kim, Jong-Bok, "Types of prepositional passives in English. Paper presented at 2007 Summer Meeting, the English Linguistic Society of Korea" (2007)
- Ko, Heejeong, "Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization", 38, pp.49~83 (2007)
- Law, Paul, "Preposition stranding", iii, pp.631~684 (2006), Blackwell Publishing: Oxford
- Pesetsky, David, "The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features", Amsterdam: Benjamins
- Pesetsky, David, "Zero syntax", 2 (2001), Ms., MIT
- Richards, Norvin, "What Moves Where When in Which Language", (rvin) (1997)
- Roberts, Ian, "The extended projection principle as a condition on the Tense-dependency" (2001), Ms.,University of Stuttgart
- Roussou, Anna, "C, T, and the subject: That-t phenomena revisited", that-t phe112, pp.13~52 (2002)
- Roussou, Anna, "Subject on the edge" (2007), Ms., University of Cyprus
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Deletion or copying?: Right node raising in Korean and Japanese" (1999)
- Yang, Dong-Whee, "Phasal movement hypothesis and syntactic freezing", 16, pp.635~664 (2006)
- Yim, Changguk, "A note on the syntactic category of with in the with absolute constructions", 17, pp.159~170 (2007)
- Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter, "Syntactic and phonological verb movement", 4(1), pp.34~4 62 (2001)