A Case Study-Korean University Students’ Experience with and Perceptions of an Academic English Writing Class
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this case study is to examine Korean university students’ perceptions about the academic English writing class they took during the Spring semester of 2022. More specifically, this study aims to understand how satisfied students were with their learning experiences in the academic English writing class, and how they perceived its appropriateness as a mandatory English general education offered in the Korean higher education context. A survey questionnaire consisting of Likert-scale, multiple choice, and open-ended questions was the main source of the data, and a total of 65 freshmen taking the course responded. To triangulate, in-depth interviews were also conducted with three focal participants via email or Zoom upon their choice. Descriptive statistics were calculated to analyze the responses to the Likert-scale and the multiple-choice questions, and the content analysis method was applied for open-ended survey questions and interviews. Analysis of data showed that students viewed their academic English writing experiences positively due to the content knowledge and sense of achievement gained through the class as well as the instructor’s teaching style. Some participants were dissatisfied with their learning experiences because of content difficulty, relatively heavy workload, and their insufficient English proficiency which hindered them from following the class. Most students self-evaluated that their writing skills after the class somewhat improved. Students chose writing an essay, learning about academic writing conventions, such as APA styles and in-text citations, and instructor’s feedback as class activities that helped them improve their academic English writing. To the question about the appropriateness of academic English writing as a mandatory general education subject, a vast majority of students hold a positive view. Their reasons include their belief of academic English writing as essential knowledge that they need to possess as a university student belonging to an academic discourse community as well as transferable knowledge needed not only in an English class but also in various disciplines. They also recognize its practicality for their academic activities and its rarity to learn anywhere else except university. The findings suggest that school administrators should allocate more credit hours for an academic English writing course and offer it for students in their 2nd or 3rd year of university. The findings also emphasize the importance of instructors’ effort to tailor their instruction according to their students and to provide supplementary learning materials, such as pre-recorded videos so as to effectively guide students to improve their skills for English writing for academic purposes.
Abstract
The purpose of this case study is to examine Korean university students’ perceptions about the academic English writing class they took during the Spring semester of 2022. More specifically, this study aims to understand how satisfied students were with their learning experiences in the academic English writing class, and how they perceived its appropriateness as a mandatory English general education offered in the Korean higher education context. A survey questionnaire consisting of Likert-scale, multiple choice, and open-ended questions was the main source of the data, and a total of 65 freshmen taking the course responded. To triangulate, in-depth interviews were also conducted with three focal participants via email or Zoom upon their choice. Descriptive statistics were calculated to analyze the responses to the Likert-scale and the multiple-choice questions, and the content analysis method was applied for open-ended survey questions and interviews. Analysis of data showed that students viewed their academic English writing experiences positively due to the content knowledge and sense of achievement gained through the class as well as the instructor’s teaching style. Some participants were dissatisfied with their learning experiences because of content difficulty, relatively heavy workload, and their insufficient English proficiency which hindered them from following the class. Most students self-evaluated that their writing skills after the class somewhat improved. Students chose writing an essay, learning about academic writing conventions, such as APA styles and in-text citations, and instructor’s feedback as class activities that helped them improve their academic English writing. To the question about the appropriateness of academic English writing as a mandatory general education subject, a vast majority of students hold a positive view. Their reasons include their belief of academic English writing as essential knowledge that they need to possess as a university student belonging to an academic discourse community as well as transferable knowledge needed not only in an English class but also in various disciplines. They also recognize its practicality for their academic activities and its rarity to learn anywhere else except university. The findings suggest that school administrators should allocate more credit hours for an academic English writing course and offer it for students in their 2nd or 3rd year of university. The findings also emphasize the importance of instructors’ effort to tailor their instruction according to their students and to provide supplementary learning materials, such as pre-recorded videos so as to effectively guide students to improve their skills for English writing for academic purposes.
참고문헌 (20)
- Björk, L., "Academic Writing: A University Writing Course" (2003), Studentlitteratur
- Brown, J. D, "The Elements of Language Curriculum: A Systematic Approach to Program Development" (1995), Cambridge University Press
- 차현지, "국내 한 대학의 이공계 학생들의 학술교양영어 수업의 만족도와 요구에 대한 연구", 교육문화연구, 27(4), pp.201~222 (2021), 교육연구소[DOI]
- Crawford Camiciottoli, B., "Meeting the challenges of European student mobility: Preparing Italian Erasmus students for business lectures in English", ESP Journal, 29(4), pp.268~280 (2010)
- Dudley-Evans, T., "The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages", pp.131~136 (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Eriksson, A., "Redesigning discipline-specific writing assignments to improve writing on an EMI programme of engineering", Journal of Academic Writing, 8(2), pp.48~66 (2018)
- Hutchinson, T., "English for Specific Purposes" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- 황명환, "대학 학술 목적 중심 교양 영어 프로그램 모형 개발 연구: 대학 교양 영어를 중심으로", Foreign Languages Education, 27(1), pp.139~172 (2020), 한국외국어교육학회[DOI]
- Hyland, K., "Second Language Writing" (2019), Cambridge University Press
- Hyland, L., "EAP: issues and directions", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), pp.1~12 (2002)
- Jalleh, C., "Chinese-speaking ESL pre-university students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of collaborative planning in an academic writing course", Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), pp.1174~1189 (2021)
- Jeon, Eun-Young, "The effect of learner-centered EFL writing instruction on Korean university students’ writing anxiety and perception", TESOL International Journal, 13(3), pp.100~112 (2018)
- 전재은, "Internationalization by English-Medium Instruction? Professors’ decoupling behaviors to EMI policy in Korean higher education", KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 17(2), pp.297~318 (2020), 한국교육개발원[DOI]
- Jordan, R. R., "English for Academic Purposes" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- 좌수민, "Understanding the Development of EFL Undergraduate Students’ Research Writing: An Investigation of the Use of Metadiscourse", 현대영어교육, 21(1), pp.1~11 (2020), 현대영어교육학회[DOI]
- 이송은, "Fitting student needs: Purpose", needs specific English writing in higher education, 2022, pp.22(2), 597~613[DOI]
- Nunan, D., "Language Teaching Methodology: Textbook for Teachers" (2000), Longman
- 심은숙, "Academic Writing Needs and Tasksin EFL Writing Classes", 인문과학연구, 50(50), pp.113~133 (2016), 인문과학연구소
- 이지연, "대학 영어학습자들을 위한 과업기반 학술영어 읽기 지도 방안", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(1), pp.933~960 (2016), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- "ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2012"[URL]
