『熱河日記』에 나타난 토론 서술의 유형

Abstract

The types of describing contents of debate in Yeolhailgi are summarized into three types: type of criticizing ideology,type of enlarging perception, type of reflecting on existence. The type of criticizing ideology attempts to criticize a false conventional idea or perspective. The type of enlarging perception attempts to break off a worn-out cast of perception, and then to aim for a larger cast of perception. The type of reflecting on existence attempts to find out a dwarfish self, and then to search for a solution to overcome the dwarfish self. The three types have two layers each. The first layer is an experience of China and its culture. The second layer is to refute the opponent. The organizational principle of debate is formed, as the two layers are being intermixed. The organizational principle is to deconstruct the false ideology by the contents with a direct experience, to break off a stereotyped view or preoccupation by a relative perspective,and to blur the lines between the outer object and the inner self. And the overall principle of the three types is to ‘inquire into the root in the level of Dongchejungyong(東體中用)’. The description of debate has two significances in its epistemological aspect. One is that the paradigm of Dongchejungyong has a specific quality by way of the description of debate, and that the description of debate has a typical quality by way of the paradigm of Dongchejungyong. The other is that the subject of perception keeps going on the composition of knowledge by way of debate.