본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Solidarity of Human Ecology and Ecological Theology for Our Ecological Crisis

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The ecological crisis that includes global warming is driving the entire living community, including human civilization, to extermination, the IPCC reports. In order that theology might contribute to resolving this crisis, I argue that ecological theology needs to collaborate with the ecological sciences, and in particular with the discipline of human ecology. This collaboration can be practiced through ethical overlap, a method of dialogue between science and theology. There is common ground between human ecology and eco-theology: in the first instance, the human being and the social system are never separate from the ecosystem. Both disciplines also emphasize humanity’s role, whether it is seen as destructive or constructive. Nevertheless, there are difficulties in building a bridge between human ecology and eco-theology. For example, some environmentalists deny evolution, because of their conservative theology. Furthermore, while human ecology presupposes co-adaption between the social system and the ecosystem, many ecological theologies seem to ignore the importance of the human social system. In order to establish a more effective solidarity between human ecology and eco-theology, I modify Edward Wilson’s interdisciplinary model. If one keeps a critical viewpoint against Wilson’s tendency of biological reductionism and his intention to fix the order of interdisciplinary collaboration, however, this modified model can be utilized as a useful method in which four areas or disciplines – natural science, social science, the humanities including theology, and environmental policy – will be mutually interactive with careful strategy in order to resolve the current ecological crisis such as climate change.

Abstract

The ecological crisis that includes global warming is driving the entire living community, including human civilization, to extermination, the IPCC reports. In order that theology might contribute to resolving this crisis, I argue that ecological theology needs to collaborate with the ecological sciences, and in particular with the discipline of human ecology. This collaboration can be practiced through ethical overlap, a method of dialogue between science and theology. There is common ground between human ecology and eco-theology: in the first instance, the human being and the social system are never separate from the ecosystem. Both disciplines also emphasize humanity’s role, whether it is seen as destructive or constructive. Nevertheless, there are difficulties in building a bridge between human ecology and eco-theology. For example, some environmentalists deny evolution, because of their conservative theology. Furthermore, while human ecology presupposes co-adaption between the social system and the ecosystem, many ecological theologies seem to ignore the importance of the human social system. In order to establish a more effective solidarity between human ecology and eco-theology, I modify Edward Wilson’s interdisciplinary model. If one keeps a critical viewpoint against Wilson’s tendency of biological reductionism and his intention to fix the order of interdisciplinary collaboration, however, this modified model can be utilized as a useful method in which four areas or disciplines – natural science, social science, the humanities including theology, and environmental policy – will be mutually interactive with careful strategy in order to resolve the current ecological crisis such as climate change.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 전현식, "생명(창조)에 대한 몰트만의 삼위일체적 성령론적 이해의 동학-생태여성학적 재해석 및 비전", 한국조직신학논총, 11, pp.215~246 (2004)
  2. 정미현, "기독교 신학의 비주류 전통 다시보기 : 생태여성신학의 함의", 한국조직신학논총, (41), pp.159~192 (2015), 한국조직신학회[DOI]
  3. Bews, J. W., "Human Ecology" (1973), Russell & Russell
  4. Carson, Rachel, "Silent Spring" (2002), Houghton Mifflin
  5. Fowler, Robert Booth, "The Greening of Protestant Thought" (1995), University of North Carolina Press
  6. Gebara, Ivone, "Longing for Running Water: Ecofeminism and Liberation" (1999), Fortress Press
  7. Haught, John F., "Deeper Than Darwin: The Prospect for Religion in the Age of Evolution" (2003), Westview Press
  8. Hefner, Philip J., "The Human Factor: Evolution, Culture, and Religion Theology and the Sciences" (1993), Fortress Press
  9. Kuhn, Thomas S., "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" (1965), University of Chicago Press
  10. Lovelock, James, "Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth" (2000), Oxford University Press
  11. Marten, Gerald G., "Human Ecology: Basic Concepts for Sustainable Development" (2001), Earthscan Publications
  12. McFague, Sallie, "Life Abundant: Rethinking Theology and Economy for a Planet in Peril" (2001), Fortress Press
  13. Merchant, Carolyn, "The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution" (1980), Harper & Row
  14. Peters, Ted, "Science and Theology: The New Consonance" (1998), Westview Press
  15. Peters, Ted, "Science, Theology, and Ethics, Ashgate Science and Religion Series" (2003), Ashgate
  16. Ruether, Rosemary Radford, "Gaia and God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing" (1992), HarperSanFrancisco
  17. Scharper, Stephen B., "Redeeming the Time: A Political Theology of the Environment" (1997), Continuum
  18. Wilson, Edward O., "Sociobiology: The New Synthesis" (1992), Mineum Press
  19. Wilson, Edward O., "Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge" (1998), Distributed by Random House

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)