김기덕 영화에서 '동일시'의 윤리적 성격에 관한 고찰 -<파란대문>의 분석을 중심으로
A Psychoanalytical Study on the Ethical Characteristic of ‘Identification’ in Kim, Ki-duk’s Films - Focusing on <Birdcage Inn>-
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kim, Ki-duk, who is a renowned filmmaker in the global art film market,has made 15 films since 1996. His corpus has been said that it can be divided into two groups on the basis of the ways he treats the violence and sensational subject-matters,which used to be a trademark of his films until Spring, Summer,Fall, Winter … And Spring. I especially focused on the fact that his films,nonetheless, have dealt with love stories and showed the astounding identification dialectic, eventually made by the desired one after having gone through some hardships given by the desiring one. Birdcage Inn is an early exemplary film in terms of this implausible psychoanalytical turn in the identification procedures. In order to analyze the film, I looked into the Lacanian terms of the imaginary identification with the mirror image and mother, that is the imaginary ego, the symbolic identification with father, that is the ego-ideal, and the identification with the symptom (sinthome) itself. In addition, I examined that the neighbor in the Freudian sense is “those faceless monsters” with the impossible inter-subjectivity. According to the above theory, I analyzed the identification procedures in Birdcage Inn. To make a long story short, I could conclude that Hemi, the college student’s identification with Jina, the prostitute in that inn, followed the identification trajectory of Oedipus complex and ends up inthe identification with Jina as the Real or the extimate sinthome of hers. Nevertheless, it can be said that this film still did not make sure the fourth knot in Borromean knots and thus was about to fall into a cul-de-sac of perversion. Perhaps, the seemingly soft feeling of the late works might be considered as Kim’s attempt to get closer to ‘the symbolic nomination’ after having through the harsh criticisms on his perversive attitude.
Abstract
Kim, Ki-duk, who is a renowned filmmaker in the global art film market,has made 15 films since 1996. His corpus has been said that it can be divided into two groups on the basis of the ways he treats the violence and sensational subject-matters,which used to be a trademark of his films until Spring, Summer,Fall, Winter … And Spring. I especially focused on the fact that his films,nonetheless, have dealt with love stories and showed the astounding identification dialectic, eventually made by the desired one after having gone through some hardships given by the desiring one. Birdcage Inn is an early exemplary film in terms of this implausible psychoanalytical turn in the identification procedures. In order to analyze the film, I looked into the Lacanian terms of the imaginary identification with the mirror image and mother, that is the imaginary ego, the symbolic identification with father, that is the ego-ideal, and the identification with the symptom (sinthome) itself. In addition, I examined that the neighbor in the Freudian sense is “those faceless monsters” with the impossible inter-subjectivity. According to the above theory, I analyzed the identification procedures in Birdcage Inn. To make a long story short, I could conclude that Hemi, the college student’s identification with Jina, the prostitute in that inn, followed the identification trajectory of Oedipus complex and ends up inthe identification with Jina as the Real or the extimate sinthome of hers. Nevertheless, it can be said that this film still did not make sure the fourth knot in Borromean knots and thus was about to fall into a cul-de-sac of perversion. Perhaps, the seemingly soft feeling of the late works might be considered as Kim’s attempt to get closer to ‘the symbolic nomination’ after having through the harsh criticisms on his perversive attitude.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김호영, "김기덕의 <나쁜 남자>와 이미지-텍스트로서의 영화", 역사와 사회, 3(29) (2002)
- 레나타 살레클, "사랑과 증오의 도착들" (2003), 도서출판 b
- 맹정현, "리비돌로지: 라캉 정신분석의 쟁점들" (2010), 문학과 지성사
- 브루스 핑크, "라캉과 정신의학" (2002), 민음사
- 슬라보예 지젝, "그들은 자기가 하는 일을 알지 못하나이다" (2004), 인간사랑
- 슬라보예 지젝, "부정적인 것과 함께 머물기" (2007), 도서출판 b
- 슬라보예 지젝, "이데올로기라는 숭고한 대상" (2001), 인간사랑
- 슬라보예 지젝, "성적 차이의 실재 in: 성관계는 없다" (2006), 도서출판 b
- 슬라보예 지젝, "이웃들과 그 밖의 괴물들: 윤리적 폭력을 위한 변명 in: 이웃" (2010), 도서출판 b
- 안드레아 벨라비타, "약간 모자란 듯한 영화: 김기덕 in: 한국의 영화감독 7인을 말하다" (2008), 본북스
- 알렌카 주판치치, "실재의 윤리: 칸트와 라캉" (2004), 도서출판 b
- 정성일, "김기덕: 야생 혹은 속죄양" (2003), 행복한 책읽기
- 조엘 도르, "라깡과 정신분석임상: 구조와 도착증" (2005), 아난케
- 조엘 도르, "라깡 세미나ㆍ에크리 독해 I" (2009), 아난케
- 케네스 레이너드, "이웃의 정치신학을 위하여 in: 이웃" (2010), 도서출판 b
- 조엘 도르, "프로이트ㆍ라깡 정신분석임상" (2005), 아난케
- Dylan Evans, "Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis" (1996), Routledge
- Jacques Lacan, "Bruce Fink" (2006), W. W. Norton & Co
- Jacques Lacan, "Seminar VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959-60" (1992), W. W. Norton & Co
- Jacques Lacan, "The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book I: Freud’s Papers on Technique 1953-1954" (1988), Norton
- Lorenzo Chiesa, "Subjectivity and Otherness: A Philosophical Reading of Lacan" (2007), The MIT Press
- Mladen Dolar, "At First Sight, in Gaze and Voice As Love Object" (1996), Duke Univ. Press
- "네티즌과 김기덕이 나눈 10문 10답" (2001), 씨네 21
