본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

아피찻퐁(Apichatpong Weerasethakul) 영화의 다양한 미학적 전략

Various Aesthetic Methods of Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s Film

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Apichatpong Weerasethakul is one of the noticeable directors in 21th century. Evaluating his film world is probably intermediate inspection about the dialectic of the modern artistic forms. We can not judge that he knows well thoroughly and embodies modern aesthetic concepts. He is possibly located in the cutting edge like a surfer on the tremendous wave of the film art history. There’s not special cinematic language which defines his artistic paradigm. Only he wonders in a magnetic field of sensory and intuition with placing himself at a wave’s disposal. Photographic punctum is converted with movement image in his films. Also squeeze into a crevice of representation. Finally he enters into double representation as Francis Bacon did. Sometimes he dissolves the storytelling. At the same time, is coming back to the Adam’s language like salmon’s recurrence. And he is on the verge of finality of storytelling before we know. He puzzled spectators with camp and kitsch which are mixed in mythological world. And directly capture the syndrome of ‘love’ which our human being have hold from the beginning of the world. He has a microscope and a telescope, at the same time, he push hard the two views of the world unexpectedly. If I can put that in quote like Deleuze, his films are a kind of apparatus which compel the speculation. There is a node which farewell to a way of modern thought that an accident leads reason awakening and make a special conclusion. We have experienced a point that compelling spectator’s thought in Apichatpong’s films. His art will be keywords which can understand new wave of post modern film history.

Abstract

Apichatpong Weerasethakul is one of the noticeable directors in 21th century. Evaluating his film world is probably intermediate inspection about the dialectic of the modern artistic forms. We can not judge that he knows well thoroughly and embodies modern aesthetic concepts. He is possibly located in the cutting edge like a surfer on the tremendous wave of the film art history. There’s not special cinematic language which defines his artistic paradigm. Only he wonders in a magnetic field of sensory and intuition with placing himself at a wave’s disposal. Photographic punctum is converted with movement image in his films. Also squeeze into a crevice of representation. Finally he enters into double representation as Francis Bacon did. Sometimes he dissolves the storytelling. At the same time, is coming back to the Adam’s language like salmon’s recurrence. And he is on the verge of finality of storytelling before we know. He puzzled spectators with camp and kitsch which are mixed in mythological world. And directly capture the syndrome of ‘love’ which our human being have hold from the beginning of the world. He has a microscope and a telescope, at the same time, he push hard the two views of the world unexpectedly. If I can put that in quote like Deleuze, his films are a kind of apparatus which compel the speculation. There is a node which farewell to a way of modern thought that an accident leads reason awakening and make a special conclusion. We have experienced a point that compelling spectator’s thought in Apichatpong’s films. His art will be keywords which can understand new wave of post modern film history.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Marc Jimenez, "미학이란 무엇인가" (2003), 동문선
  2. Pierre Bourdieu, "구별 짓기: 문화와 취향의 사회학" (1995), 새물결
  3. Immanuel Kant, "판단력 비판" (2003), 박영사
  4. J. F. Lyotard, "숭고와 아방가르드, in 지식인의 종언" (1993), 문예출판사
  5. Jean Baudillard, "시뮬라시옹" (2002), 민음사
  6. Pascal Bonitzer, "영화와 회화" (2003), 동문선
  7. Michel Foucault, "이것은 파이프가 아니다" (1993), 민음사
  8. Claude Levi-Strauss, "보다, 듣다, 읽다" (2005), 이매진 북스
  9. Gilles Deleuze, "네마 1" (2002), 시각과 언어
  10. Kathryn Hume, "환상과 미메시스" (2000), 푸른 나무
  11. Walter Benjamin, "도시의 산책자" (2008), 새물결
  12. Harold Osborne, "옥스포드 20세기 미술사전" (2001), 시공사
  13. Gilles Deleuze, "감각의 논리" (2006), 민음사
  14. M. M. Bakhtin, "프랑수아 라블레의 작품과 중세 및 르네상스의 민중문화" (2001)
  15. 움베르토 에코, "새로운 중세인가 포스트모던인가" (2005), 새물결
  16. 이정우, "주름, 갈래, 울림" (2001), 거름
  17. E. H. Gombrich, "Meditation on a hobby horse" (1963), Phaion Press
  18. Patrick Fuery, "Visual Cultures and Critical Theory, 「Invisibility and Hallucination: The State of the image in the postmodern world」" (2003), A Hodder Arnold Publication

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)