LEED Healthcare에서 득점 현황 분석에 관한 연구
The Analysis of Achieved Score earned by LEED Healthcare
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to find out week and strong aspects in LEED categories based on achieved scores earned by LEED-HC(Healthcare) v.2009. Methods: The LEED-HC scorecards of 88 healthcare projects are analyzed. The analysis are focused on relationship between achieved scores, LEED categories and achieved levels. This relationship was presented by graphs and charts. Results: 1) Compare to LEED-NC, in LEED-HC, sub-categories related to public health are added. The scores are added in Energy Atmosphere and Indoor Environmental Quality. 2) Achieve scores in Sustainable Site are high and one in Energy Atmosphere and Indoor Environmental Quality are low at all levels. 3) Scores which was lost in Energy Atmosphere are recovered in Material Resource and Sustainable Site in order to keep its level. 4) Since most of scores in Energy Atmosphere are under EAc1 Optimize energy performance sub-categories, it is important to achieve more score in Optimize Energy Performance Sub-Categories to gain a higher level. Even if LEED-HC has more score in Energy Atmosphere, this is a hard to achieve scores in that categories. It is important to review Energy Atmosphere categories and its points for improvement. Implications: This study will provide basic database in order to establish Korean green building rating system for hospital.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to find out week and strong aspects in LEED categories based on achieved scores earned by LEED-HC(Healthcare) v.2009. Methods: The LEED-HC scorecards of 88 healthcare projects are analyzed. The analysis are focused on relationship between achieved scores, LEED categories and achieved levels. This relationship was presented by graphs and charts. Results: 1) Compare to LEED-NC, in LEED-HC, sub-categories related to public health are added. The scores are added in Energy Atmosphere and Indoor Environmental Quality. 2) Achieve scores in Sustainable Site are high and one in Energy Atmosphere and Indoor Environmental Quality are low at all levels. 3) Scores which was lost in Energy Atmosphere are recovered in Material Resource and Sustainable Site in order to keep its level. 4) Since most of scores in Energy Atmosphere are under EAc1 Optimize energy performance sub-categories, it is important to achieve more score in Optimize Energy Performance Sub-Categories to gain a higher level. Even if LEED-HC has more score in Energy Atmosphere, this is a hard to achieve scores in that categories. It is important to review Energy Atmosphere categories and its points for improvement. Implications: This study will provide basic database in order to establish Korean green building rating system for hospital.
참고문헌 (8)
- "G-SEED"[URL]
- 김가희, "LEED 인증건축물의 용도별 득점 및 적용 현황 비교 분석 연구", 한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집, 9(3), pp.222~228 (2015), 한국건축친환경설비학회
- Energy Consumption Survey, "Korea Energy Economics Institute", 120~ (2014)
- 이호성, "병원건축의 친환경 성능 향상을 위한 국내외 친환경 건축물 평가항목의 비교 연구", 한국실내디자인학회 논문집, 18(1), pp.99~107 (2009), 한국실내디자인학회
- 임영환, "지속가능한 의료시설 계획을 위한 평가방법 개발 - GBCC, LEED, BREEAM의 비교·분석을 중심으로 -", 대한건축학회논문집, 26(08), pp.153~162 (2010), 대한건축학회
- Maryam Golbazia, "Analysis of Credits Earned by LEED Healthcare Certified Facilities", Procedia Enineering, 145, pp.203~210 (2016)
- 왕정준, "병원시설의 녹색건축 인증기준 국내외 비교연구", KIEAE Journal, 14(4), pp.81~89 (2014), 한국생태환경건축학회[DOI]