LEED-Healthcare 세부항목의 평균득점률을 통한 병원의 친환경성 분석
Analysis of Sustainability of Hospital Based on Average Achieved Rate in LEED-HC Credits
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of the research is to find difficulty levels of LEED credits in each LEED level based on credits achievement in order to find important of LEED-HC credits to gain LEED-HC. Methods: The individual credits of LEED-HC v.2009 scorecards from USGBC website are analyzed. With achieved scores rate of LEED credits per each Level, all credits are reassembled in 4 different ranges (A~D); easy (A), easy-moderate (B), moderate-hard (C) and hard (D) to achieve scores. Results: 1) Achieved point rate in LEED-HC specific credits are low. These credits need to be reviewed carefully. 2) In 88 projects, 37 projects are gained Silver level which is more than projects in certification level. In order to encourage to gain LEED-HC level, Average Achieved rate to earn Certificate level needs to be risen. 3) Credits in range D rarely affect to gain platinum level. EAc1 (24 points) are critical to gain Silver and Gold level. However, EAc1 points are not effective to achieve Certificate level. Implications: This research will provide a fundamental back data to set up Korean Green building rating system for Healthcare.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the research is to find difficulty levels of LEED credits in each LEED level based on credits achievement in order to find important of LEED-HC credits to gain LEED-HC. Methods: The individual credits of LEED-HC v.2009 scorecards from USGBC website are analyzed. With achieved scores rate of LEED credits per each Level, all credits are reassembled in 4 different ranges (A~D); easy (A), easy-moderate (B), moderate-hard (C) and hard (D) to achieve scores. Results: 1) Achieved point rate in LEED-HC specific credits are low. These credits need to be reviewed carefully. 2) In 88 projects, 37 projects are gained Silver level which is more than projects in certification level. In order to encourage to gain LEED-HC level, Average Achieved rate to earn Certificate level needs to be risen. 3) Credits in range D rarely affect to gain platinum level. EAc1 (24 points) are critical to gain Silver and Gold level. However, EAc1 points are not effective to achieve Certificate level. Implications: This research will provide a fundamental back data to set up Korean Green building rating system for Healthcare.
참고문헌 (9)
- "G-SEED"[URL]
- 김가희, "LEED 인증건축물의 용도별 득점 및 적용 현황 비교 분석 연구", 한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집, 9(3), pp.222~228 (2015), 한국건축친환경설비학회
- 강지은, "LEED Healthcare에서 득점 현황 분석에 관한 연구", 의료·복지 건축, 25(3), pp.7~14 (2019), 한국의료복지건축학회[DOI]
- 이호성, "병원건축의 친환경 성능 향상을 위한 국내외 친환경 건축물 평가항목의 비교 연구", 한국실내디자인학회 논문집, 18(1), pp.99~107 (2009), 한국실내디자인학회
- 임영환, "지속가능한 의료시설 계획을 위한 평가방법 개발 - GBCC, LEED, BREEAM의 비교·분석을 중심으로 -", 대한건축학회논문집, 26(08), pp.153~162 (2010), 대한건축학회
- Maryam Golbazia, "Analysis of Credits Earned by LEED Healthcare Certified Facilities", Procedia Enineering, 145, pp.203~210 (2016)
- 왕정준, "병원시설의 녹색건축 인증기준 국내외 비교연구", KIEAE Journal, 14(4), pp.81~89 (2014), 한국생태환경건축학회[DOI]
- "USGBC"[URL]
