二晏词的风格和审美意识试探
Research of the Styles and Aesthetic Consciousness of the Two Yan Ci
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Inheriting the spirit of the Late Tang and Five Dynasties, and reflecting the peaceful conditions of the era, using the style of Qing Li, Two Yan Ci created many works. Especially, these trends are comparable to the works of Yan Shu, who reverenced the Feng Yansi of the Southern Tang era. Meanwhile, Yan Jidao, who was skilled in creating works of the Xiaoling style, concentrated on disposition, making his works close to the Fenliuroumei which has origins from Li Houzhu of the Southern Tang era, while he showed similarity to this father Yan Shu. Simultaneously, he also expressed sorrow, which overall made his works feel connotative and humane. Like this, they had different styles and aesthetic consciousness on expression, but on the other hand, since they were both “poets of the Wan yue-faction”, they also had some aspects in common. Moreover, Two Yan mostly used the form of Xiaoling, and the contents were practically similar; yearning, and parting between men and women, lament on the past youth, and the frailty of human life. To look over their methods on expressions, they both used methods such as beauty of Hanxu(connotation), Tianya(elegance), Menglong(Indistinct) and Shenqi(mystic), showing various aesthetic trends. Also, we can see through the fact that they used these methods to foward the ample contents and figures of everyday life to an artistic level, recreating the literary value of the work.
Abstract
Inheriting the spirit of the Late Tang and Five Dynasties, and reflecting the peaceful conditions of the era, using the style of Qing Li, Two Yan Ci created many works. Especially, these trends are comparable to the works of Yan Shu, who reverenced the Feng Yansi of the Southern Tang era. Meanwhile, Yan Jidao, who was skilled in creating works of the Xiaoling style, concentrated on disposition, making his works close to the Fenliuroumei which has origins from Li Houzhu of the Southern Tang era, while he showed similarity to this father Yan Shu. Simultaneously, he also expressed sorrow, which overall made his works feel connotative and humane. Like this, they had different styles and aesthetic consciousness on expression, but on the other hand, since they were both “poets of the Wan yue-faction”, they also had some aspects in common. Moreover, Two Yan mostly used the form of Xiaoling, and the contents were practically similar; yearning, and parting between men and women, lament on the past youth, and the frailty of human life. To look over their methods on expressions, they both used methods such as beauty of Hanxu(connotation), Tianya(elegance), Menglong(Indistinct) and Shenqi(mystic), showing various aesthetic trends. Also, we can see through the fact that they used these methods to foward the ample contents and figures of everyday life to an artistic level, recreating the literary value of the work.
참고문헌 (28)
- 陈廷焯, "白雨斋词话" (2009), 上海古籍出版社
- 陈振孙, "直斋书錄解题" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 方孝儒, "逊志斋集" (2000), 宁波出版社
- 冯煦, "词话丛编ㆍ蒿庵论词" (1986), 中华书局
- 冯煦, "宋六十一家词选" (1910), 掃葉山房
- 冯至, "杜甫诗选" (1956), 人民文学出版社
- 郭绍虞, "中国历代文论选" (1979), 上海古籍出版社
- 黄蓼园, "蓼园词选" (1988), 齐鲁书社
- 黄庭坚, "豫章先生文集" (1929), 商务印书馆
- 金启华, "中国词史论纲" (1992), 南京出版社
- 李渔, "词话丛编ㆍ窥词管见" (1986), 中华书局
- 李之仪, "全宋文" (2006), 上海辞书出版社
- 刘大櫆, "论文偶记" (1959), 人民文学出版社
- 刘熙载, "艺概·词曲概" (2009), 中华书局
- 刘勰, "文心雕龙" (1962), 人民文学出版社
- 沈祥龙, "词话丛编ㆍ论词随笔" (1986), 中华书局
- 沈祖棻, "宋词赏析" (2003), 北京出版社
- 王国维, "词话丛编ㆍ人间词话" (1986), 中华书局
- 吴处厚, "青箱杂记" (1985), 中华书局
- 谢榛, "四溟诗话" (1961), 人民文学出版社
- 谢桃坊, "柳永词选评" (1981), 上海古籍出版社
- 谢章铤, "词话丛编ㆍ赌棋山莊词话" (1986), 中华书局
- 杨慎, "词品" (1936), 商务印书馆
- 永瑢等, "四库全书总目提要" (1962), 中华书局
- 唐圭璋, "唐宋词简释" (1981), 上海古籍出版社
- 脱脱, "宋史" (1977), 中华书局
- 葉燮, "原诗" (2010), 凤凰出版社
- 赵令畤, "侯鲭錄" (1998), 上海古籍出版社
