본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

総力戦体制下における芸能統制: 能楽における技芸者証とその意味を中心に

The Control of Performing Arts Under the Total War System in Japan: about “Gigeisha-sho”(the License of Performing Arts) to the Noh Performers

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to try to explicate and clarify the historical characteristics and consider their meaning of the control of performing arts under the Total War System in Japan. Noh was forced to the verge of collapse by the Meiji Restoration. Through the Edo period, Noh was able to maintain their organization and keep the space of existence by financial and political support from the Daimyo(大名) and samurai. However, the efforts of the Daimyo and samurai were dismantled by the Meiji Restoration, and Noh fell into a state of disrepair, so to speak. But overcoming the long time of hardship, Noh had a revival again as a “national entertainment” with the strong assistance of nobility and state power. Noh then secured a position as the appropriate peforming entertainment for the national prestige of the Empire of Japan as a modern state to counter the Western powers. As part of the expansion policy for the construction of their empire, Japan started the Sino-Japanese war and even commenced war with the United States by attacking Pearl Harbor. As the war continued and the war situation deteriorated, it was very necessary and profoundly essential for Japan to carry out the Total War System. As a result of system, a severe cultural control policy was implemented. The targets for this control policy were all kinds of cultural media such as movies, newspaper, radio broadcasting, plays and all other performing arts. The state power of Imperial Japan did not allow any activities of “Gigeisha”(entertainers) or traditional arts and implemented policies to issue a license of the performing called “Gigeisha-sho”. Of course, Noh was also included. There were no exceptions. But as above mentioned, Noh had a more special prestige and dominant position as the “national entertainment” than the others. At the implementation of this control policy, Noh had to abandon their dominant position and superiority and stand on the same footing as other performing arts. That was a humiliation and an ordeal for the Noh that was hard to accept and endure. The prestige of Noh which had been lifted up and led by the state power was withdrawn by the state power itself at this time.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to try to explicate and clarify the historical characteristics and consider their meaning of the control of performing arts under the Total War System in Japan. Noh was forced to the verge of collapse by the Meiji Restoration. Through the Edo period, Noh was able to maintain their organization and keep the space of existence by financial and political support from the Daimyo(大名) and samurai. However, the efforts of the Daimyo and samurai were dismantled by the Meiji Restoration, and Noh fell into a state of disrepair, so to speak. But overcoming the long time of hardship, Noh had a revival again as a “national entertainment” with the strong assistance of nobility and state power. Noh then secured a position as the appropriate peforming entertainment for the national prestige of the Empire of Japan as a modern state to counter the Western powers. As part of the expansion policy for the construction of their empire, Japan started the Sino-Japanese war and even commenced war with the United States by attacking Pearl Harbor. As the war continued and the war situation deteriorated, it was very necessary and profoundly essential for Japan to carry out the Total War System. As a result of system, a severe cultural control policy was implemented. The targets for this control policy were all kinds of cultural media such as movies, newspaper, radio broadcasting, plays and all other performing arts. The state power of Imperial Japan did not allow any activities of “Gigeisha”(entertainers) or traditional arts and implemented policies to issue a license of the performing called “Gigeisha-sho”. Of course, Noh was also included. There were no exceptions. But as above mentioned, Noh had a more special prestige and dominant position as the “national entertainment” than the others. At the implementation of this control policy, Noh had to abandon their dominant position and superiority and stand on the same footing as other performing arts. That was a humiliation and an ordeal for the Noh that was hard to accept and endure. The prestige of Noh which had been lifted up and led by the state power was withdrawn by the state power itself at this time.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 横井春野, "能楽全史" (1917), 龍吟社
  2. 池内信嘉, "能楽盛衰記" (1926), 東京創元社
  3. 陸軍省新聞班, "国防の本義と其強化の提唱" (1934), 陸軍省
  4. 能勢朝次, "能楽源流考" (1938), 岩波書店
  5. 陸軍省情報部, "国家総力戦の戦士に告ぐ" (1939), 陸軍省
  6. 日本文化中央連盟, "日本文化団体年鑑" (1943), 日本文化中央連盟
  7. 小林静雄, "能楽史研究" (1945), 雄山閣
  8. 今井清一, "国家総動員(二)政治" (1974), みすず書房
  9. 表章, "能楽史新考" (1979), わんや書店
  10. 表章, "能楽史新考2" (1986), わんや書店
  11. 表章, "岩波講座 - 能・狂言Ⅰ能楽の歴史" (1987), 岩波書店
  12. 倉田喜弘, "日本近代思想大系18 芸能" (1988), 岩波書店
  13. 芸能史研究会, "日本芸能史第 7巻 近代・現代" (1990), 法政大学出版局
  14. 阪口弘之, "日本芸能史" (1999), 昭和堂
  15. 有山輝雄, "情報局関係資料 第2巻" (2000), 柏書房
  16. 酒井直樹, "岩波講座 - 近代日本の文化史7" (2002), 岩波書店
  17. 徐禎完, "植民地朝鮮と帝国日本―民族・都市・文化" (2010), 勉誠 出版

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)