설명(explication)의 논리 구조시퀀스 이론을 중심으로
Logical Structure of the Explanation focused on the sequence theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to show that the explanatory sequence can adopt the logic of the answer from the narrative and argumentative sequences, positioning them as subsequences of the explanatory sequence. For the content of an explanation to be persuasive, strategies that make an admissible speech to the caller are necessary. This is one strategy suggested by the theory of the sequence: to place the narrative or argumentative sequence as a subsequence of the explanatory sequence. The significance of this study lies in the attempt to overcome the definitions of particular sequences and illustrate the relationships between them. Clarifying the relationship of combinatorial sequences is important to understand not only the structure of the text but also the textual meaning. As research on the relationships between the sequences has proceeded, we have arrived at the need to methodologically classify these results. If this classification clarifies the sequential relationships and their effects on meaning in the text, we can establish a new grammar of the text.
Abstract
This article aims to show that the explanatory sequence can adopt the logic of the answer from the narrative and argumentative sequences, positioning them as subsequences of the explanatory sequence. For the content of an explanation to be persuasive, strategies that make an admissible speech to the caller are necessary. This is one strategy suggested by the theory of the sequence: to place the narrative or argumentative sequence as a subsequence of the explanatory sequence. The significance of this study lies in the attempt to overcome the definitions of particular sequences and illustrate the relationships between them. Clarifying the relationship of combinatorial sequences is important to understand not only the structure of the text but also the textual meaning. As research on the relationships between the sequences has proceeded, we have arrived at the need to methodologically classify these results. If this classification clarifies the sequential relationships and their effects on meaning in the text, we can establish a new grammar of the text.
참고문헌 (23)
- 박인철, "현대불란서 언어학의 방법과 실제" (1994), 연세대학교 출판부
- 박인철, "파리학파의 기호학" (2003), 민음사
- 아리스토텔레스, "시학" (2010), 펭귄 클래식 코리아
- 홍종화, "현대 불란서 언어학의 방법과 실제" (1994), 연세대학교 출판부
- Adam J.-M., "Dictionnaire d'analyse du discours" (2002), Seuil
- Adam J.-M., "Types de texte ou genres de discours? Comment classer les textes qui disent de et comment faire?", Langage, 35(141), pp.10~27 (2001)
- Adam J.-M., "Eléments de linguistique textuelle: théorie et pratique de l'analyse textuelle" (1990), Margada
- Adam J.-M., "Les textes: types et prototypes" (2009), Armand Colin
- Apotheloz D., "Travaux du centre de recherches sémiologiques n°57", pp.1~42 (1989), Université de Neuchâtel
- Apotheloz D., "Discours et raisonnement, in Sémiologie du raisonnement" (1984), Peter Lang
- Borel M.-J., "Études de Lettres n°4", pp.66~85 (1991), Université de Lausanne
- Borel M.-J., "L'explication dans l'argumentation: approche sémiologique", Langue française, (50), pp.20~38 (1981)
- Garfinkel H., "Studies in Ethnomethodology" (1967), Englewood Cliffs
- Greimas A. J., "la préface de Sémiotique narrative et discursive de J. Courtés" (1993), Hachette
- Greimas A.-J., "Du sens II" (1983), Seuil
- Grize J.-B., "Revue européenne des sciences sociales n°56", pp.7~14 (1981), Droz
- Plantin C., "Dictionnaire d'analyse du discours" (2002), Seuil
- Plantin C., "Dictionnaire d'analyse du discours" (2002), Seuil
- Ricoeur P., "Tome I" (1983), Editions du Seuil
- Sartre J.-P., "Situations I" (1947), Gallimard
- Toulmin S. E., "The Use of Argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- 한겨레신문, "박 대통령은 ‘국회법 개정안’을 왜 그토록 반대할까요?", ~ (2015)
- 조이뉴스24, ""왜 이제와서"…LG의 도박, 미스터리 3가지", ~ (2015)