日本語の文構成から見る主観性及び間主観性の考察 -主語、補語、述語の省略と明示を対象として-
A Study of Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in Japanese Sentence Structure - For the Ellipsis and Explicit of Subject, Complement, and Predicate-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Japanese sentence structure is divided into subject, complement and predicate. It is considered that by omitting or clarifying these elements, the index of subjectivity and intersubjectivity is influenced. In this study, when the sentence constituent elements of the subject, the complement, and the predicate are omitted or explicitly constructed, the subjectivity is analyzed by measuring the degree of subjectivity. As a result, it seems that the explicit phenomenon of predicate influences the subjectivity. It is considered that this is because the predicate has a function that means the speaking attitude of the speaker. In addition, it is considered that the recognition of the speaker is most clearly expressed in the predicate. The subject has a weaker effect on subjectivity than the predicate, but it appears to have a certain effect because it expresses the speaker's viewpoint. However, since a complement is an element that exists to supplement the meaning of a predicate, it has little effect on subjectivity and intersubjectivity.
Abstract
Japanese sentence structure is divided into subject, complement and predicate. It is considered that by omitting or clarifying these elements, the index of subjectivity and intersubjectivity is influenced. In this study, when the sentence constituent elements of the subject, the complement, and the predicate are omitted or explicitly constructed, the subjectivity is analyzed by measuring the degree of subjectivity. As a result, it seems that the explicit phenomenon of predicate influences the subjectivity. It is considered that this is because the predicate has a function that means the speaking attitude of the speaker. In addition, it is considered that the recognition of the speaker is most clearly expressed in the predicate. The subject has a weaker effect on subjectivity than the predicate, but it appears to have a certain effect because it expresses the speaker's viewpoint. However, since a complement is an element that exists to supplement the meaning of a predicate, it has little effect on subjectivity and intersubjectivity.
참고문헌 (16)
- 池上嘉彦, "日本語らしさの中の＜主観性＞", 言語, 28(1), pp.84~94 (1999)
- 池上嘉彦, "言語における＜主観性＞と＜主観性＞の言語的指標(1)", 認知言語学論考, (3), pp.1~49 (2003), ひつじ書房
- 池上嘉彦, "言語における＜主観性＞と＜主観性＞の言語的指標(2)", 認知言語学論考, (4), pp.1~60 (2003), ひつじ書房
- 池上嘉彦, "＜主観的把握＞とは何かー日本語話者における＜好まれる言い回し＞", 言語, 35(5), pp.20~27 (2006)
- 荻原稚佳子, "日本人の言いさし表現に対する察しの現れ方", 講座日本語教育, (36), pp.69~85 (2000)
- 久野暲, "談話の文法" (1978), 大修館書店
- 黒滝真理子, "日英対照：モダリティの主観化-度合いと速度との相関関係から-", 桜文論叢, (60), pp.307~320 (2004)
- 권근령, "日本語に見られる主観性及び間主観性の一考察 : 主語の省略・明示現象から", 외국학연구, (39), pp.291~316 (2017), 외국학연구소[DOI]
- 권근령, "日本語に見られる主観性･間主観性の一考察 ─ 補語の省略･明示現象から ─", 일본학보, (115), pp.21~43 (2018), 한국일본학회[DOI]
- 権槿玲, "日本語における主観性及び間主観性の考察-省略と明示を対象として-", 博士, pp.2020
- 澤田治美, "ひつじ意味論講座第５巻－主観性と主体性" (2011), ひつじ書房
- 廣瀬幸生, "日本語から見た日本人-主体性の言語学" (2010), 開拓社
- 本多啓, "言語に現れた主観性と間主観性-生態心理学の観点から-", ことば工学研究会, 31, pp.41~50 (2009)
- 村田年, "日本語と英語における省略法の相違について", 木更津工業高等専門学校紀要, (2), pp.91~110 (1969)
- 呂晶, "日本語広告表現の語用論的機能に関する一考察:述語が現れない文を中心に", 日本语言文化研究, (3), pp.421~431 (2014)
- 山口律子, "日本語の省略現象とコミュニケーションにおける問題", 経営・情報研究多摩大学研究紀要, 7, pp.83~87 (2002)