본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본어 아이러니 발화의 언어적 특징-부적절성과 적절성을 중심으로-

Linguistic Characteristics of Japanese Ironic Utterances -Focus on Inappropriateness and Appropriateness-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of Japanese ironic utterances. Based on the examination of inappropriateness of ironic utterances presented in previous studies, this study explored how these characteristics appear in Japanese ironic utterances. In addition, it examined the concept of appropriateness for utterances that cannot be explained only by inappropriateness with the concept of appropriateness. As a result, although inappropriateness was prominent in ironic utterances in Japanese, appropriateness also accounted for a significant portion, suggesting that appropriateness plays an important role in ironic utterances. More specifically, while the characteristics of infelicitous questions, inappropriate style, and emphasis were prominently displayed in the case of inappropriateness, the following characteristics were prominently displayed in the case of appropriateness: analogy, comparison/contrast, and generalization. In addition, it was found that the characteristics of appropriateness had a neutral personality against inappropriateness and appropriateness, and had strong contextual dependence. On the other hand, the interpersonal effect of ironic utterances appeared in positive and negative aspects. This is not because of the inherent properties of specific expressions, but depending on the expressions used together or contexts. It means that the interpersonal effect is also strong contextual dependence.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of Japanese ironic utterances. Based on the examination of inappropriateness of ironic utterances presented in previous studies, this study explored how these characteristics appear in Japanese ironic utterances. In addition, it examined the concept of appropriateness for utterances that cannot be explained only by inappropriateness with the concept of appropriateness. As a result, although inappropriateness was prominent in ironic utterances in Japanese, appropriateness also accounted for a significant portion, suggesting that appropriateness plays an important role in ironic utterances. More specifically, while the characteristics of infelicitous questions, inappropriate style, and emphasis were prominently displayed in the case of inappropriateness, the following characteristics were prominently displayed in the case of appropriateness: analogy, comparison/contrast, and generalization. In addition, it was found that the characteristics of appropriateness had a neutral personality against inappropriateness and appropriateness, and had strong contextual dependence. On the other hand, the interpersonal effect of ironic utterances appeared in positive and negative aspects. This is not because of the inherent properties of specific expressions, but depending on the expressions used together or contexts. It means that the interpersonal effect is also strong contextual dependence.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Brown L., ""Mind your own esteemed business" : Sarcastic honorifics use a nd impoliteness in Korean TV dramas", Journal of Politeness Research, 9(2), pp.159~186 (2013)
  2. Grice. H. P., "Sy ntax and Semantics, 3", pp.41~58 (1975)
  3. Leech, G. N., "Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman
  4. Okamoto, S., "An analysis of the usage of Japanese hiniku : Based on the communicative insincerity theory of irony", Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), pp.1143~1169 (2007)
  5. Searle, J., "Speech acts : an essay in the philosophy of language" (1969), Cambridge University Press
  6. Wilson, D., "On verbal irony", Lingua, 87, pp.53~76 (1992)
  7. 이시야마테츠야, "한일 경어운용에 관한 일고찰", 日本學硏究, 20, pp.411~432 (2007), 일본연구소
  8. 磯野史弥, "Web掲示板における皮肉の分類および自動検出", 研究報告自然言語処理(NL), 7, pp.1~8 (1997)
  9. 内海彰, "アイロニーとは何か?―アイロニーの暗黙的提示理論", 認知科学, 4(4), pp.99~112 (1997)[DOI]
  10. 岡本真一郎, "アイロニーの実験的研究の展望-理論修正の試みを含めて", 心理学評論, 47(4), pp.395~420 (2004)
  11. 岡本真一郎, "ことばの社会心理学" (2010), ナカニシヤ出版
  12. 尾鼻靖子, "武装する敬語: 非命題的アイロニー考察", 言語と文化, 23, pp.19~34 (2020)
  13. 河上誓作, "アイロニーの言語学, 待兼山論叢", 文学篇, 32, pp.1~16 (1998)
  14. 河上誓作, "アイロニーの言語学" (2018), 鳳書房
  15. 滝澤修, "アイロニー表現検出の一手法", 人工知能, 9(6), pp.875~881 (1994)
  16. "小学館" (2020)[URL]
  17. 座間直樹, "アイロニー表現とエコー発話", 神奈川大学大学院言語と文化論集, 10, pp.33~74 (2003)
  18. 張興, "「ではないか」の用法について", 世界の日本語教育日本語教育論集, 14, pp.193~205 (2004)
  19. 瀬戸賢一, "日本語のレトリック" (2002), 岩波ジュニア新書
  20. 筒井佐代, "皮肉─話し手の観点から", 愛知県立大学外国語学部紀要(言語‧文学編), 25, pp.333~349 (1993)
  21. 中田一志, "談話における否定疑問文の二つの機能", 日本語‧日本文化, 44, pp.1~29 (2017)
  22. 中村明, "日本語レトリックの体系―文体のなかにある表現技法のひろがり" (1991), 岩波書店
  23. 奈良夕里枝, "条件表現バ、タラ、ナラの使用の個人差", フェリス女学院大学文学部紀要, 56, pp.93~105 (2021)
  24. 日本語文法学会, "日本語文法辞典" (2014), 大修館書店
  25. 野内良三, "レトリック辞典" (1998), 国書刊行会
  26. 橋本邦彦, "修辞疑問文", 言語学論叢, 1, pp.33~47 (1982)
  27. 하정일, "関連性理論から見た敬語の過剰使用とその語用論的効果-慇懃無礼を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 87(1), pp.233~257 (2013), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  28. 松村明, "大辞林" (2006), 物書堂
  29. 三木悦三, "疑問文の語用論, 西川盛雄教授退職記念論文‧随筆集", pp.36~50 (2009)
  30. 村越行雄, "アイロニー:伝統的なアプローチと最近のアプローチ(2)", 跡見学園女子大学紀要, 34, pp.11~41 (2001)
  31. 山田忠雄, "新明解国語辞典" (2011), 三省堂
  32. 安藤裕介, "反対関係理論(河上理論)におけるアイロニー的表現の役割と重要性", 久留米大学文学部紀要国際文化学科編, 28, pp.97~110 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)