본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Design of a Structural Model of Team Learning

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this article was to design a structural model of team lerning. In order to design the model, the research utilized the spiral system-design methodology (Park, 2001), a revised version of Banathy’s (1991) systems-design process, which includes the major stages of developing a knowledge base, preparation, analysis, design, evaluation, and implementation. However, the implementation stage was not included in this study. The first to third stage involved in developing a knowledge base for the whole design process, preparing design prerequisites, and analyzing core knowledge base for indentifying design feature. Fourth was the design stage, during which values, and purposes, and functions, components of the model were determined for envisioning the wholistic model. The final stage of the design process was the expert evaluation and revision of the model, in which seven experts in team learning (four academicians and three practitioners) formatively evaluated the model; and based upon the analysis and evaluation of experts’feedback, the initial version of the model was revised. The study finally presented summary, recommendations, and areas for further research.

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to design a structural model of team lerning. In order to design the model, the research utilized the spiral system-design methodology (Park, 2001), a revised version of Banathy’s (1991) systems-design process, which includes the major stages of developing a knowledge base, preparation, analysis, design, evaluation, and implementation. However, the implementation stage was not included in this study. The first to third stage involved in developing a knowledge base for the whole design process, preparing design prerequisites, and analyzing core knowledge base for indentifying design feature. Fourth was the design stage, during which values, and purposes, and functions, components of the model were determined for envisioning the wholistic model. The final stage of the design process was the expert evaluation and revision of the model, in which seven experts in team learning (four academicians and three practitioners) formatively evaluated the model; and based upon the analysis and evaluation of experts’feedback, the initial version of the model was revised. The study finally presented summary, recommendations, and areas for further research.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Argyris, C, "Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice" (1996), Addison-Wesley
  2. Banathy,B.H, "Systems design of education: A journey to create the future" (1991), Educational Technology Publications
  3. Banathy,B.H, "A systems view of education: Concepts and principles for effective practice. Englewood Cliffs" (1992), Educational Technology Publications
  4. Barney,J, "Firm resources and the theory of competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 17, pp.99~120 (1991)
  5. Barry,B.W, "Strategic planning workbook for nonprofit organizations" (1997), Amherst H. Wilder Foundation
  6. Bion,W.R, "Experiences in groups" (1962), Basic Books
  7. Bohm, D, "On dialogue" (1996), Chapman and Hall, Inc.
  8. Cartwright, D, "Group dynamics: Research and theory" (1968), Harper & Row
  9. Checkland P.B, "Systems thinking, systems practice" (1981), John Wiley & Sons
  10. Cohen, S. G, "What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite", Journal of Management, 23(3), pp.239~290 (1997)
  11. Comer,D.R, "A model of social loafing in real work groups", Human Relations, 48(6), pp.647~667 (1995)
  12. Cross, R, "Team learning: Best practices and tools for an elusive concept", National Productivity Review, 18(3), pp.9~18 (1999)
  13. Dechant, K, "Team learning survey and facilitator guide. King of Prussia", Organization Design & Development, ~ (1993)
  14. Dechant, K, "Toward a model of team learning. Studies", Continuing Education, 15(1), pp.1~14 (1993)
  15. Dechant, K, "Team as learners: A research-based model of team learning", Journal of applied behavioral science, 33(2), pp.227~247 (1997)
  16. Denzin,N.K, "The logic of naturalistic inquiry. ㅑㅜ Sociological methods: A sourcebook" (1978), McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
  17. Devenport,T.H, "Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology" (1993), Harvard Business School Press
  18. Hackman,J.R, "Groups that work (and those that don’t) creating conditions for effective teamwork" (1990), Jossey-Bass
  19. Hammer,M, "Beyond the reengineering: process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives" (1996), HarperCollins Publishers
  20. Hammer, M, "Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution" (1993), Harper Collins Publishers.
  21. Harkins,S.G, "Social loafing and social facilitation", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, pp.1~18 (1987)
  22. Harkins, S.G, "The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, pp.457~465 (1985)
  23. Isaacs,W.N, "Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning", Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), pp.24~39 (1993)
  24. Isaacs,W.N, "Dialogue: The power of collective thinking", The Systems Thinker, 4(3), pp.1~4 (1993)
  25. Janis,I.L, "Groupthinking: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes" (1982), Houghton Mifflin
  26. Janis, I. L, "Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment" (1977), Free Press
  27. Jaques,D, "Learning in groups" (1992), Gulf Publishing Company
  28. Katzenbach, J. R, "The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization" (1993), Harvard Business School Press
  29. Kline, P, "Ten steps to a learning organization" (1993), Great Ocean Publishers
  30. what can go wrong, "Teamwork: What must go right", pp.1989, Larson, C. E
  31. Lincoln, Y. S, "Naturalistic inquiry" (1985), Sage publications
  32. Marquardt, M. J, "Building the learning organization: A systems approach to quantum improvement and global success" (1996), McGraw-Hill
  33. Mezirow,J, "Transformative dimensions of adult learning" (1991), Jossey-Bass
  34. Michaelsen, L.K, "Drawing conclusions from the team learning literature in health sciences education: A commentary", Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17, pp.85~89 (2005)
  35. Miller, D. T, "Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, pp.298~305 (1987)
  36. Nonaka, I, "The knowledge-creating company" (1995), Oxford University Press
  37. Oxford,E.F, "A study of collective learning in the workplace", 박사, pp.1998
  38. Park,S.H, "A Systems view of team learning: Toward a theory for the design of electronic performance support for team learning", Indiana University, ~ (2001)
  39. Pearn,M.A, "Empowering team learning", Institute of Personnel and development, ~ (1998)
  40. Pfeiffer, J. W, "Understanding applied strategic planning: a manager's guide", University Associates, ~ (1985)
  41. Reigeluth,C.M, "Educational Technology at the Crossroads: New mindsets and new direction", ETR&D, 37, pp.67~80 (1989)
  42. Reigeluth, C. M, "Formative research: A methodology for improving design theories. ㅑㅜ Instructional design theories and models", pp.633~652 (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  43. Reigeluth, C. M, "Systemic change in education.Englewood Cliffs" (1994), Educational Technology Publications
  44. Schein,E.H, "On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning", Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), pp.40~51 (1993)
  45. Schein,E.H, "Organizational culture", American Psychologist, 45, pp.109~119 (1990)
  46. Schein,E.H, "Process Consultation" (1988), Addison-Wesley
  47. Schein,E.H, "On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning", Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), pp.40~51 (1993)
  48. Schon,D.A, "The reflective practitioner" (1983), Basic Books
  49. Senge,P, "The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization" (1990), Doubleday
  50. Senge,P, "The leader’s new work: Building learning organizations", Sloan Management Review, 32(1), pp.7~24 (1990)
  51. Senge , P, "The fifth discipline: field book" (1994), Doubleday
  52. Tuckman,B.W, "Development sequence in small groups", Psychological Bulletin, 63, pp.384~399 (1965)
  53. Sweet. M, "How group dynamics research can inform the theory and practice of postsecondary small group learning", Educational Psychology Review, 9, pp.31~47 (2007)
  54. Watkins, K. E, "Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art of systemic change" (1993), Jossey-Bass
  55. Zenger, H, "Leading teams: Mastering the new role" (1994), Irwin

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)