본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mathematics classes in Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States compared to Korea based on TIMSS 2007

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study examines if there is a difference in the response rate of the TIMSS 2007 survey for 8th grades of 3 countries compared to Korea about the mathematics classes. In order to interpret a mathematics class in each country’s educational environment, the result of interview with TIMSS National Research Coordinator(NRC) of each country was used. The results are follows. The differentiated instruction is more carried out in Korea and Korea showed the lowest frequency of the enrichment instruction. The emphasized mathematics content was different from country to country depending on the math teaching methods and class activities. The dependence on teacher centered lecture-style activities in Korea was heavier than Singapore, and the U.S. The frequency of homework was higher in other countries, and Korea didn’t use homework as class materials or evaluation as much as other countries. The use of calculators and computers in Korea and Taiwan was lower than the other countries. Evaluating methods of mathematics teachers in Korea have been mostly done by school administrators or the results of students’ achievement test. Therefore some implications are suggested to Korean education. First, it is need to establish strategies for the differentiated instruction in the light of efficacy of course work of achievement for each level. Second, the lecture should be changed to be more meaningful to students. Third, teachers should do more than just checking homework and develop methods that will link homework to teaching-learning-evaluation. Forth, teachers should take advantage of the computer in class for students’ self-directed learning derived from their interest. Finally, teachers should be provided with feedback and consulting about class.

Abstract

This study examines if there is a difference in the response rate of the TIMSS 2007 survey for 8th grades of 3 countries compared to Korea about the mathematics classes. In order to interpret a mathematics class in each country’s educational environment, the result of interview with TIMSS National Research Coordinator(NRC) of each country was used. The results are follows. The differentiated instruction is more carried out in Korea and Korea showed the lowest frequency of the enrichment instruction. The emphasized mathematics content was different from country to country depending on the math teaching methods and class activities. The dependence on teacher centered lecture-style activities in Korea was heavier than Singapore, and the U.S. The frequency of homework was higher in other countries, and Korea didn’t use homework as class materials or evaluation as much as other countries. The use of calculators and computers in Korea and Taiwan was lower than the other countries. Evaluating methods of mathematics teachers in Korea have been mostly done by school administrators or the results of students’ achievement test. Therefore some implications are suggested to Korean education. First, it is need to establish strategies for the differentiated instruction in the light of efficacy of course work of achievement for each level. Second, the lecture should be changed to be more meaningful to students. Third, teachers should do more than just checking homework and develop methods that will link homework to teaching-learning-evaluation. Forth, teachers should take advantage of the computer in class for students’ self-directed learning derived from their interest. Finally, teachers should be provided with feedback and consulting about class.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 강대중, "PISA 2009 읽기성취도 데이터를 활용한 학교효과 분석", 교과교육학연구, 17(2), pp.323~345 (2013), 교과교육연구소
  2. Trends and International Comparative Analysis of Educational Environment in TIMSS, "Kim, S.", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.RRC 2012-1 (2012)
  3. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, "Suhakkyoyuk Seonjinhwa Bangan" (2012), Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, "Smart Kyoyuk Bonggyek Doypeul WihanSilhaeng Gyehoek Balpyo" (2011), Ministry of Education, Scienceand Technology
  5. Ministry of Education, Singapore, "Education in Singapore: Findings from international benchmarking studies" (2011), Ministry of Education, Singapore
  6. TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report:Findings From IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grade, "Mullis, I. V. S.", TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education. Boston College, ~ (2008)
  7. NCTM, "Principles and standards for school mathematics" (2000), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  8. Roth, K, "Implications for math and science instruction", Principal Leadership(Middle School Education), 8(9), pp.23~27 (2008)
  9. Stigler, J. W, "The teaching gap" (1999), Free Press
  10. TIMSS Video Mathematics Research Group, "Understanding and improving mathematics teaching: Highlights from TIMSS 1999 Video Study", The Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), pp.768~775 (2003)
  11. 염시창, "PISA 2006 과학성취도에 대한 학생 및 학교 수준 맥락요인의 영향력 분석", 교과교육학연구, 15(2), pp.281~304 (2011), 교과교육연구소
  12. Zeichner, K. M, "Teacher education programs, In Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education", pp.645~735 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)