본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Computer-based Language Testing: Potential and Pitfalls

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The computer is positioning itself as the primary base for performing language assessment. Unlike earlier studies that focused on the comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing, more recent studies on computer-based assessment are actively examining how the testing method may affect performance. This paper briefly highlights some seminal studies on computer-based language assessment, and then looks at some major recent research trends. This paper goes on to introduce computer-based tests that make the most of the advantages of computer technology: a listening test that allows test takers to control the number of times they listen to a recorded passage; a computer-based reading test that enables test takers to make markings on the screen; and a writing test that allow internet search, and a computer-based reading test that lets test takers adjust the setting for typeface, font size, and line spacing. This paper concludes with introducing the latest research trends and with calling for more research on the construct of and access to computer-based tests.

Abstract

The computer is positioning itself as the primary base for performing language assessment. Unlike earlier studies that focused on the comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing, more recent studies on computer-based assessment are actively examining how the testing method may affect performance. This paper briefly highlights some seminal studies on computer-based language assessment, and then looks at some major recent research trends. This paper goes on to introduce computer-based tests that make the most of the advantages of computer technology: a listening test that allows test takers to control the number of times they listen to a recorded passage; a computer-based reading test that enables test takers to make markings on the screen; and a writing test that allow internet search, and a computer-based reading test that lets test takers adjust the setting for typeface, font size, and line spacing. This paper concludes with introducing the latest research trends and with calling for more research on the construct of and access to computer-based tests.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Arnold, V., "Do students get higher scores on their word-processed papers? A study in scoring handwritten vs. word-processed papers" (1990), Unpublished paper, Rio Hondo College, Whittier, CA
  2. Bachman, L. F., "Fundamental considerations in language testing" (1990), Oxford University Press
  3. Bachman, L. F., "Modern language testing at the turn of the century : Assuring that what we count counts", Language testing, 17(1), pp.1~42 (2000)
  4. Bridgeman, B., "Comparability of scores on word-processed and handwritten essays on the graduate management admissions test", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (1988)
  5. Brown, J. D., "Computers in language testing : Present research and some future directions", Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), pp.44~59 (1997)
  6. Chapelle, C. A., "Assessing language through computer technology" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  7. Choi, I. C., "Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language test", Language Testing, 20(3), pp.295~320 (2003)
  8. Coniam, D., "Experimenting with a computer essayscoring program based on ESL student writing scripts", ReCall, 21(2), pp.259~279 (2009)
  9. Ginther, A., "Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli", Language Testing, 19(2), pp.133~167 (2002)
  10. Goldberg, A. L., "Performance differences according to test mode and computer familiarity on a practice graduate record exam", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(6), pp.1053~1067 (2011)
  11. Harrington, S., "The influence of word processing on English placement test", Computers and Compositions, 17, pp.197~210 (2000)
  12. In'mani, Y., "A meta-analysis of test format effects on reading and listening test performance : Focus on multiple-choice and open-ended formats", Language Testing, 26(2), pp.219~244 (2009)
  13. Jun, H. S., "A validity argument for the use of scores from a web-search-permitted and web-source-based integrated writing test", doctoral, pp.2014
  14. Kirsch, I., "Unpublished manuscript" (1997), Educational Testing Service
  15. Lee, H. K., "A comparative study of ESL writers’ performance in a paper-based and a computer-delivered writing test", Assessing Writing, 9(1), pp.4~26 (2004)
  16. Lee, S. H., "The effects of marking on computer-based reading test performance", master’s, pp.2012
  17. Lee, Y. W., "Toward automated multi-trait scoring of essays : Investigating links among holistic, analytic, and text feature scores", Applied Linguistics, 31(3), pp.391~417 (2010)
  18. Lim, J., "The effects of options in typeface, size, and line spacing on computer-based reading test performance", master’s, pp.2013
  19. Madsen, H., "Evaluating a comptuer-adaptive ESL placement test", CALICO Journal, 4(2), pp.41~50 (1986)
  20. Ockey, G. J., "Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests", Language Testing, 24(4), pp.517~537 (2007)
  21. Ockey, G. J., "Developments and challenges in the use of computer-based testing for assessing second language ability", The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), pp.836~847 (2009)
  22. Powers, D. E., "Will they think less of my handwritten essay if others word process theirs? Effects on essay scores of intermingling handwritten and word-processed essays", Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(3), pp.220~233 (1994)
  23. Roever, C., "Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics", Language Testing, 23(2), pp.229~256 (2006)
  24. Sawaki, Y., "Comparability of conventional and computerized tests of reading in a second language", Language Learning & Technology, 5(2), pp.38~59 (2001)
  25. 신상근, "인터넷 기반 평가에서 듣기 자료 청취 횟수가 듣기 평가 결과와 수험자의 반응에 미치는 영향", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 14(1), pp.211~224 (2011), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
  26. Shohamy, E., "Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension", Language Testing, 1, pp.147~170 (1984)
  27. Swain, M., "Teaching and testing communicatively", TESL Talk, 15(1 & 2), pp.7~18 (1984)
  28. Sweedler-Brown, C. O., "Computers and assessment : The effect of typing versus handwriting on the holistic score of essays", Research and Teaching in Development Education, 8, pp.5~14 (1991)
  29. The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks, "Taylor, C.", ETS, ~, pp.TOEFL Research Report 61; ETS Research Report 98-08 (1998)
  30. Wagner, E., "Are they watching? Test-taker viewing behavior during an L2 video listening test", Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), pp.67~86 (2007)
  31. The effects of task, language of assessment, and target language experience on foreign language learners performance on reading comprehension tests, "Wolf, D. F.", ~, pp.UMI No. 9124507 (1991)
  32. Wolfe, E. W., "Composition medium comparability in a direct writing assessment of non-native English speakers", Language Learning and Technology, 8(1), pp.53~65 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)