고종 즉위 초기 군주관 형성과 그 내용
The Formation and Substance of Ideas of Monarch during the Early Years of Kojong's Reign.
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In December 1863, 12-year-old Kojong(高宗) rose as the 26th monarch. And until 1873, Kojong continued to concentrate on autocratic education while partaking in and collaborating with Daewongun(大院君) in his policy-making decisions and progress. During this period, this allowed Kojong to devote himself to imbibing the qualities of an emperor amidst a relatively open and safe political power structure and to form Confucian democracy ideologies and autocratic perspective. The key of ideas of monarch was the logic of a proxy for providence and public sentiment(天命論), the logic of the only successor to the royal ancestors(祖宗繼承論), the logic of all people's lord and father(君父論), the logic of all people's lord and teacher(君師論). The logic of a proxy for providence and public sentiment(天命論) meant monarch had to reflect providence and public sentiment to state management. Especially, Kojong had to take a serious view of the logic of a proxy for providence and public sentiment for legitimizing accession. In a situation like this, Kojong revealed his talent of quality as a monarch through expression about performing of providence and public sentiment. The logic of the only successor to the royal ancestors(祖宗繼承論) meant monarch had to succeed to the rights and duties of tradition of the royal ancestors. It was applied to emphasize lineal descent of royalty of succession to the throne of Kojong and to control state administration of Kojong. Also Kojong mentioned it very often because it was easiest to show his conduct and speech was right. Therefore he was going to take the justifiability of his policies by presenting precedents or traditions of ancestors. The logic behind status and power of a monarch equal to that of father(君父論) meant monarch had to care for all his people like a father. If he did, monarch could rightfully demand loyalty from his people. Such people's loyalty to their monarch became basis of monarch's sovereignty. Also the logic behind status and power of a monarch equal to that of teacher(君師論) meant monarch had a responsibility for the education and guidance of his people. And these logics behind status and power of a monarch was a point of Kojong's grip of power. These ideas of monarch gave sacred status and power to monarch and urged active role of monarch. Under these circumstances, Kojong became to recognize how much monarch meant to his people and nation. And Kojong pursued and consolidated state management under monarch's hegemony based on these ideas of monarch.
Abstract
In December 1863, 12-year-old Kojong(高宗) rose as the 26th monarch. And until 1873, Kojong continued to concentrate on autocratic education while partaking in and collaborating with Daewongun(大院君) in his policy-making decisions and progress. During this period, this allowed Kojong to devote himself to imbibing the qualities of an emperor amidst a relatively open and safe political power structure and to form Confucian democracy ideologies and autocratic perspective. The key of ideas of monarch was the logic of a proxy for providence and public sentiment(天命論), the logic of the only successor to the royal ancestors(祖宗繼承論), the logic of all people's lord and father(君父論), the logic of all people's lord and teacher(君師論). The logic of a proxy for providence and public sentiment(天命論) meant monarch had to reflect providence and public sentiment to state management. Especially, Kojong had to take a serious view of the logic of a proxy for providence and public sentiment for legitimizing accession. In a situation like this, Kojong revealed his talent of quality as a monarch through expression about performing of providence and public sentiment. The logic of the only successor to the royal ancestors(祖宗繼承論) meant monarch had to succeed to the rights and duties of tradition of the royal ancestors. It was applied to emphasize lineal descent of royalty of succession to the throne of Kojong and to control state administration of Kojong. Also Kojong mentioned it very often because it was easiest to show his conduct and speech was right. Therefore he was going to take the justifiability of his policies by presenting precedents or traditions of ancestors. The logic behind status and power of a monarch equal to that of father(君父論) meant monarch had to care for all his people like a father. If he did, monarch could rightfully demand loyalty from his people. Such people's loyalty to their monarch became basis of monarch's sovereignty. Also the logic behind status and power of a monarch equal to that of teacher(君師論) meant monarch had a responsibility for the education and guidance of his people. And these logics behind status and power of a monarch was a point of Kojong's grip of power. These ideas of monarch gave sacred status and power to monarch and urged active role of monarch. Under these circumstances, Kojong became to recognize how much monarch meant to his people and nation. And Kojong pursued and consolidated state management under monarch's hegemony based on these ideas of monarch.
참고문헌 (53)
- "승정원일기"
- "일성록"
- "고종실록"
- "태조실록"
- "연산군일기"
- "영조실록"
- "정조실록"
- "서경"
- "禮記"
- "孟子"
- "大學章句序"
- "논어"
- 李彦迪, "中庸九経衍義"
- 이이, "율곡전집"
- 정도전, "三峰集"
- 황현, "매천야록"
- James Palais B, "전통한국의 정치와 정책" (1993), 한국한술진흥재단
- 강광식, "신유학사상과 조선조 유교정치문화" (2000), 집문당
- 교수신문기획, "고종황제 역사청문회" (2005), 푸른역사
- 菊池謙譲, "近代朝鮮史 上" (1940), 大陸研究所
- 김문식, "정조의 경학과 주자학" (2000), 문헌과 해석사
- 김문식, "정조의 제왕학" (2007), 태학사
- 김성혜, "1890년대 고종의 통치권력 강화 논리에 대한 일고찰 -君父論과 君師論을 중심으로", 역사와경계, (78), pp.287~321 (2011), 부산경남사학회
- 김성혜, "재위전기(1864-1876) 고종의 강연과 그 실태", 사학연구, (93), pp.191~240 (2009), 한국사학회
- 김성혜, "고종 재위전기 통치에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2008
- 김세은, "고종초기 국왕권의 회복과 왕실행사", 박사, pp.2003
- 김준석, "조선후기 정치사상사의 연구" (2003), 지식산업사
- 도광순, "권양촌사상 연구" (1989), 교문사
- 박현모, "정조의 군사론 비판", 한국실학연구, (2) (2000), 한국실학학회
- 박현모, "정조의 성왕론과 경장정책에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1999
- 박현모, "정치가 정조" (2001), 푸른 역사
- 부남철, "유교적 학자군주 정조의 종교정책", 한국정치학회보, 37(2), pp.47~66 (2003), 한국정치학회
- 부남철, "조선 전기 군주권 유지를 위한 이념정책", 한국정치학회보, 25(1) (1991)
- 신명호, "을미사변 후 고종의 國母復讎와 君主專制論", 동북아 문화연구, 1(19), pp.5~22 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
- 연갑수, "고종대 정치변동 연구" (2008), 일지사
- 윤대식, "맹자의 천명관이 지닌 정치적 함의: 정치적 의무에 기초한 권력의 정당성 기제", 한국정치학회보, 36(4), pp.27~44 (2002), 한국정치학회
- 윤정, "英祖의 『聖學輯要』 이해와 君師 이념", 역사와경계, (66), pp.55~92 (2008), 부산경남사학회
- 이근호, "영조대 군사론의 정치적 의의", 북악사학회, 10 (2003)
- 이상익, "유교와 자유주의", 정치사상연구, 3 (2000)
- 이성무, "조선시대 당쟁사 1․2" (2001), 동방미디어
- 이태진, "고종시대의 재조명" (2000), 태학사
- 장영숙, "고종,44년의 비원" (2010), 너머북스
- 장영숙, "고종의 정치사상과 정치개혁론" (2010), 도서출판 선인
- 田保橋潔, "近代日鮮關係の硏究 上" (1940), 朝鮮總督府中樞院
- 김용헌, "조선 성리학 지식권력의 탄생" (2010), 프로네시스
- 정옥자, "정조시대의 사상과 문화" (1999), 돌배개
- 한국사상사연구회, "조선유학의 개념들" (2002), 예문서원
- 한상권, "백성과 소통한 군주, 정조", 역사비평, (89), pp.144~172 (2009), 역사문제연구소
- 한상권, "正祖의 君主觀", 조선시대사학보, (41), pp.141~177 (2007), 조선시대사학회
- 한영우, "대한제국은 근대국가인가" (2008), 푸른역사
- 한영우, "정조의 화성행차 그 8일" (1998), 효형출판
- 홍순민, "19세기 왕위 계승과정과 정통성", 국사관논총, 40 (1992)
- 홍순민, "조선후기 왕실 구성과 선원록", 한국문화, 11 (1990)
