본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『混一疆理歷代國都之圖』의 山嶽 표기에 나타난 諸認識

Diverse Recognitions in the Kangnido through the Inscription of Mountains

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study analyzes the naming, criteria for selection as a recording subject and meaning of mountains written at the Rykoku copy of the Kangnido(『混一疆理歷代國都之圖』). I could find that the inscription of mountains played a significant role recognizing the foundation of Joseon Dynasty and its territory. It was thought that map-making was related to the justification of one state because it was made right after Joseon Dynasty was established. We can make sure these through the inscription of Jiri-san(mountain), which was described as an independent mountain by differentiating from other mountains. The reason was that Jiri-san was a mountain related with the foundation of Joseon and a place to justify the political purpose. We can find it once again in other documents that Seokwang-Temple had given a hint that Lee Seongye would become a king. As a result, the position of Samgak-san was changed largely with the transfer of the capital “Hanyang” and the position of Songak-san which had been a main mountain of Koryeo Dynasty was changed not to be written any more. It was like an announcement that Joseon was established as a country by grandly moving away from the former dynasty, Koryeo. We could also notice the map-makers' concern regarding the territory of Joseon through the method of inscribing the chain of mountains limited only to Joseon. We could find the facts that Joseon intended to include the territory to the vicinity of Baikdu-san where the state had not actually ruled, which could be considered as the state's recognition of Baikdu-san. On the other hand, many mountains inscribed in the Kangnido was managed to and related with the foundation of the state. Samgak-san, Jiri-san, Gyeoryong-san and Chiak-san were included as ritual subjects among 20 mountains. Moreover, there were 9 mountains if it included Yongho-san and Hwahak-san in Kyeoggi-do, Uyeolchul-san in Jeonra-do, Hanra-san and until Gilsang-san where local officers serviced sacrificial rites. While prohibiting the rituals of Buddhism and Taoism persisted through Koryeo dynasty, Joseon dynasty intended to enforce Confucian rituals. Therefore this map inscribed many mountains where came to be included as Confucian ritual subjects. Mountains that were not included were related with the faith of Tan-Gun or locations of shrine for folk belief. Or they were related with the Buddhist-strong color and the theory of divination based on topography. These diverse rituals of early Joseon Dynasty indicate that many rituals were mixed at that time. Thus, we can find that the inscription of mountain in the Kangnido intended to serve both an ideological and practical goals for the recognition of the newly established state and could be understood as a settling process of Confucianism in Joseon Dynasty.

Abstract

This study analyzes the naming, criteria for selection as a recording subject and meaning of mountains written at the Rykoku copy of the Kangnido(『混一疆理歷代國都之圖』). I could find that the inscription of mountains played a significant role recognizing the foundation of Joseon Dynasty and its territory. It was thought that map-making was related to the justification of one state because it was made right after Joseon Dynasty was established. We can make sure these through the inscription of Jiri-san(mountain), which was described as an independent mountain by differentiating from other mountains. The reason was that Jiri-san was a mountain related with the foundation of Joseon and a place to justify the political purpose. We can find it once again in other documents that Seokwang-Temple had given a hint that Lee Seongye would become a king. As a result, the position of Samgak-san was changed largely with the transfer of the capital “Hanyang” and the position of Songak-san which had been a main mountain of Koryeo Dynasty was changed not to be written any more. It was like an announcement that Joseon was established as a country by grandly moving away from the former dynasty, Koryeo. We could also notice the map-makers' concern regarding the territory of Joseon through the method of inscribing the chain of mountains limited only to Joseon. We could find the facts that Joseon intended to include the territory to the vicinity of Baikdu-san where the state had not actually ruled, which could be considered as the state's recognition of Baikdu-san. On the other hand, many mountains inscribed in the Kangnido was managed to and related with the foundation of the state. Samgak-san, Jiri-san, Gyeoryong-san and Chiak-san were included as ritual subjects among 20 mountains. Moreover, there were 9 mountains if it included Yongho-san and Hwahak-san in Kyeoggi-do, Uyeolchul-san in Jeonra-do, Hanra-san and until Gilsang-san where local officers serviced sacrificial rites. While prohibiting the rituals of Buddhism and Taoism persisted through Koryeo dynasty, Joseon dynasty intended to enforce Confucian rituals. Therefore this map inscribed many mountains where came to be included as Confucian ritual subjects. Mountains that were not included were related with the faith of Tan-Gun or locations of shrine for folk belief. Or they were related with the Buddhist-strong color and the theory of divination based on topography. These diverse rituals of early Joseon Dynasty indicate that many rituals were mixed at that time. Thus, we can find that the inscription of mountain in the Kangnido intended to serve both an ideological and practical goals for the recognition of the newly established state and could be understood as a settling process of Confucianism in Joseon Dynasty.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. "慶尙道地理志", ~
  2. "高麗史", ~
  3. "國朝五禮儀", ~
  4. "端宗實錄", ~
  5. "東文選", ~
  6. "牧隱文藁", ~
  7. "三國史記", ~
  8. "世祖實錄", ~
  9. "世宗實錄", ~
  10. "新增東國輿地勝覽", ~
  11. "陽村集", ~
  12. "陽村先生文集", ~
  13. "練藜室記述", ~
  14. "正宗實錄", ~
  15. "太祖實錄", ~
  16. "太宗實錄", ~
  17. "弘齋全書", ~
  18. 개리 레드야드, "한국 고지도의 역사", 소나무
  19. 권정, "古地図に顕れる朝鮮初の自国認識 ―􋺷混一彊理歴代国都之図􋺸を通じて―", 日本文化學報, (41), pp.181~196 (2009), 한국일본문화학회
  20. 김철웅, "한국중세 국가제사의 체제와 잡사" (2003), 한국연구원
  21. 김도현, "太白山 天祭의 歷史와 儀禮", 역사민속학, (31), pp.195~231 (2009), 한국역사민속학회
  22. 김성환, "朝鮮初期 檀君認識", 명지사론, 4 (1992)
  23. 김아네스, "고려시대 산신 숭배와 지리산, In 지리산과 명산문화" (2010), 지리산권문화연구단
  24. 금지아, "한중 역대 서적교류사 연구" (2010), 한국연구원
  25. 김유영, "조선이 그린 세계지도" (2010), 소와당
  26. 박영한, "한국의 전통지리서", 토지연구, 1(6) (1990)
  27. 박용국, "조선초․중기 명산문화로서 지리산의 정체성, In 지리산과 명산문화" (2010), 지리산권문화연구단
  28. 방동인, "한국의 지도" (1976), 세종대왕기념사업회
  29. 송양섭, "17세기 江華島 방어체제의 확립과 鎭撫營의 창설", 韓國史學報, 13, pp.10~ (2002), 고려사학회
  30. 송용덕, "고려~조선전기의 백두산 인식", 역사와 현실, (64), pp.127~159 (2007), 한국역사연구회
  31. 이기봉, "조선의 지도천재들" (2011), 새문사
  32. 이상태, "한국의 고지도 발달사" (1999), 혜안
  33. 이찬, "한국고지도" (1997), 한국도서관학연구회
  34. 이찬, "한국의 고지도" (1991), 범우사
  35. 오길순, "『元經世大典地理圖』에 나오는 지명의 조사와 『混一疆理歷代國都之圖』서역지명과의 비교", 韓國古地圖硏究, 2(2) (2010)
  36. 오상학, "조선시대의 세계지도와 세계 인식", 박사, pp.2001
  37. 오종록, "朝鮮初期 兵馬節度使制의 成立과 運用", 진단학보, 59 (1985)
  38. 이상태, "조선초기에 제작된 팔도지도에 관한 연구", 실학사상연구, 17․18 (2000)
  39. 오상학, "국립중앙박물관 소장 『朝鮮地圖』의 地圖史的 意義", 문화역사지리, 16(1), pp.165~181 (2004), 한국문화역사지리학회
  40. 이찬, "韓國의 古世界地圖", 한국학보, 2 (1976)
  41. 이희관, "朝鮮初 太宗의 執權과 그 政權의 性格", 역사학보, 120 (1988)
  42. 전상운, "李朝初期의 地理學과 地圖」", 고문화, 4 (1966)
  43. 조지형, "『混一疆理歷代國都之圖』의 제작시기 ―류코쿠본을 중심으로―", 이화사학연구, (42), pp.65~93 (2011), 이화사학연구소
  44. 최승희, "朝鮮初期 政治史硏究" (2002), 지식산업사
  45. 최종현, "崇山思想과 都․邑 및 建築立地에 關한 硏究", 국토계획, 35(1) (2000)
  46. 최창조, "韓國 風水思想의 歷史와 地理學", 정신문화연구, 14(1) (1991)
  47. 한충희, "朝鮮初期 道制와 郡縣制 整備硏究", 계명사학, 15 (2004)
  48. 신대철, "조선의 국가제사" (2009), 한국학중앙연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)