바오로의 에게 해 선교
Paul's Aegean Mission
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Paul the Apostle is generally considered the ‘founder of Christianity’ among modern theologians. He criticized the doctrines and ritual traditions of Judaism and made Christianity a new religion which was based on the new doctrine, ‘Justification by Grace through Faith’. However, a new evaluation of early Christianity and Paul recently emerged. According to revisionists such as E. P. Sanders, Judaism was not a religion which was based on strict legalism and Paul lived as a Jew until death. While I agree with the new perspective, I still think Paul should be called the ‘founder of Christianity’. After the ‘Antioch Incident’ occurred in the late 40's, Paul left Antioch as a complete loser. But this incident gave him a new opportunity to go on a mission without any control or guide of the Jerusalem Church. This opportunity made Paul be able to make a dozen of ‘house church’ which were different fundamentally from the institutions of Judaism. These house churches were free from any control of other believers except Paul's. They made new communities which were based on the new teaching of Paul, that is, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” Conservative Christians among Jews and Gentiles could not approve these groups, because they were too progressive. So these groups were to be the objets of oppressions. Especially the circumcision group in the Jerusalem Church attacked fiercely the house churches founded by Paul in the 50s. I think Paul's greatest achievement is not his new doctrine but the foundation of house churches. In this respect Paul could be called the ‘founder of Christianity’.
Abstract
Paul the Apostle is generally considered the ‘founder of Christianity’ among modern theologians. He criticized the doctrines and ritual traditions of Judaism and made Christianity a new religion which was based on the new doctrine, ‘Justification by Grace through Faith’. However, a new evaluation of early Christianity and Paul recently emerged. According to revisionists such as E. P. Sanders, Judaism was not a religion which was based on strict legalism and Paul lived as a Jew until death. While I agree with the new perspective, I still think Paul should be called the ‘founder of Christianity’. After the ‘Antioch Incident’ occurred in the late 40's, Paul left Antioch as a complete loser. But this incident gave him a new opportunity to go on a mission without any control or guide of the Jerusalem Church. This opportunity made Paul be able to make a dozen of ‘house church’ which were different fundamentally from the institutions of Judaism. These house churches were free from any control of other believers except Paul's. They made new communities which were based on the new teaching of Paul, that is, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” Conservative Christians among Jews and Gentiles could not approve these groups, because they were too progressive. So these groups were to be the objets of oppressions. Especially the circumcision group in the Jerusalem Church attacked fiercely the house churches founded by Paul in the 50s. I think Paul's greatest achievement is not his new doctrine but the foundation of house churches. In this respect Paul could be called the ‘founder of Christianity’.
참고문헌 (27)
- A. Andrew Das, "Paul and the Jews" (2003), Hendrickson
- E. Bickerman, "The Name of Christians", The Harvard Theological Review, 42(2) (1949)
- J. D. Crossan, "In Search of Paul" (2004), HarperSanFrancisco
- K Donfried, "Judaism and Christianity in First-Century Rome" (1998), William Eerdmans Publishing
- James Dunn, "Beginning from Jerusalem" (2009), William Eerdmans
- M. Hengel, "Between Jesus and Paul : Studies in the Earliest History of Christianity" (1983), Wipf and Stock Publishers
- D. Horrell, "The Laber Χριστανος:1Peter 4:16 and the Formation of Christian Identity", The Society of Biblical Literature, 126(2) (2007)
- Jacob Neusner, "Judaism in Late Antiquity" (1995), Brill
- Marcus Borg, "The First Paul" (2009), HarperOne
- S. R. Llewelyn, "The Use of Sunday for Meetings of Believers in the New Testament", Novum Testamentum, 43(3) (2001)
- Wayne A. Meeks, "Essential Papers on Judaism and Christianity in Conflict" (1991), New York Univ.
- L. Mcnamer, "Jesus and First-Century Jerusalem" (2008), Paulist Press
- Heikki Räisänen, "Redefining First-Century Jewish and Christian Identities" (2008), University of Notre Dame Press
- Oskar Skarsaune, "In the Shadow of the Temple" (2002), InterVarsity
- R. Thompson, "Keeping the Church in Its Place" (2006), T&T Clark
- Norman Young, "“The Use of Sunday for Meeting of Believers in the New Testament” : Response", Novum Testamentum, 45(2) (2003)
- 김용준, "기독교에서 주일성수 문제: 이그나티우스의 ‘주의 날’에 대한 해석을 중심으로", 성경과 신학, 72, pp.123~154 (2014), 한국복음주의신학회
- 김성, "사도 바울의 선교여정 연구 : 유대인 디아스포라(Diaspora)와 동 지중해의 해상교통을 중심으로", 서양고대사연구, (21), pp.117~146 (2007), 한국서양고대역사문화학회
- 문병구, "안디옥 사건과 복음의 진리", 신약연구, 9(4), pp.715~733 (2010), 한국복음주의신약학회
- 박익수, "바오로 선교의 사회적 배경 연구", 신학과 세계, 28 (1994)
- 유상현, "초기 기독교의 형성" (2003), 대한기독교서회
- 이승호, "“안디옥 사건”과 바울의 선교", 신약논단, 20(1), pp.161~193 (2013), 한국신약학회
- 정기문, "바울의 마지막 예루살렘 방문", 서양고대사연구, (35), pp.255~282 (2013), 한국서양고대역사문화학회
- 유상현, "버시디아 안디옥의 바울 설교", 현대와 신학, 25 (2000)
- 유상현, "바울의 1차 선교 여행" (2002), 대한기독교서회
- 유상현, "바울의 제 2차 선교여행" (2008), 대한기독교서회
- 유상현, "바울의 3차 선교 여행" (2011), 대한기독교서회