알렌이 포착한 기회의 나라, 대한제국
Korean Empire, the Country of Opportunity Seized by Allen
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Allen had worked in Korea for 21 years in a very close relationship with the royal family. He was regarded as a member of Korean royal family rather than U.S. Diplomat by surrounding people. For such a reason, his recognition and evaluation on the Korean Empire can be regarded as relatively concrete and accurate. His view on the emperor was negative. He used words as weakness, indecision, corruption, irresponsibility, and stubborn person for representing emperor’s personality and character as a man of supreme power. As for government officials of the Korean Empire, he commented on 97 persons including Lee Young-Ik, Seo Jae-Phil, Lee Wan-Yong, and the family of Min. He regarded Lee Yong-Ik as a figure of corruption ‘who should have never been appointed’. For Seo Jae-Phil who was an American citizen, Allen showed generous attitude to protect him praising his independence movement. For Lee Wan-Yong, on the other hand, Allen changed his attitude situatinally. Sometimes he criticized Lee and evaluated him as a figure of ‘excellent judgment and courage.’ Allen’s basic view on the officials of the Korean Empire was that they are genius of changing their image and opportunistists. Relatively, he evaluated the subjugated people as naïve, diligent, hard-working and patient. He also commented that their diligence led to high enthusiasm for education, and they adopted quickly to the new environment and good workers. Allen also criticized that Japan carried out oppressive and uncivilized ruling without considering Korean’s high cultural sense and intelligent superiority. Such evaluation and recognition seem to have been expressed from Allen’s negative view on Japan as well as from his pity on Korean’s heartbreaking circumstance. Allen recognized the Korean Empire as a country of opportunity from which infinite rights could be created. Actually, Allen was involved in various kinds of rights such as gold mine, railroad, streetcar, electricity, telephone and water supply. For becoming U.S. Minister and maintaining U.S. Ministry as a person adhering to the royal family, Allen connected and mediated Emperor Gojong and American businessmen. Allen strived for the benefits of America and Americans, and regarded the Korean Empire as a rights market of America in negotiatians of rights.
Abstract
Allen had worked in Korea for 21 years in a very close relationship with the royal family. He was regarded as a member of Korean royal family rather than U.S. Diplomat by surrounding people. For such a reason, his recognition and evaluation on the Korean Empire can be regarded as relatively concrete and accurate. His view on the emperor was negative. He used words as weakness, indecision, corruption, irresponsibility, and stubborn person for representing emperor’s personality and character as a man of supreme power. As for government officials of the Korean Empire, he commented on 97 persons including Lee Young-Ik, Seo Jae-Phil, Lee Wan-Yong, and the family of Min. He regarded Lee Yong-Ik as a figure of corruption ‘who should have never been appointed’. For Seo Jae-Phil who was an American citizen, Allen showed generous attitude to protect him praising his independence movement. For Lee Wan-Yong, on the other hand, Allen changed his attitude situatinally. Sometimes he criticized Lee and evaluated him as a figure of ‘excellent judgment and courage.’ Allen’s basic view on the officials of the Korean Empire was that they are genius of changing their image and opportunistists. Relatively, he evaluated the subjugated people as naïve, diligent, hard-working and patient. He also commented that their diligence led to high enthusiasm for education, and they adopted quickly to the new environment and good workers. Allen also criticized that Japan carried out oppressive and uncivilized ruling without considering Korean’s high cultural sense and intelligent superiority. Such evaluation and recognition seem to have been expressed from Allen’s negative view on Japan as well as from his pity on Korean’s heartbreaking circumstance. Allen recognized the Korean Empire as a country of opportunity from which infinite rights could be created. Actually, Allen was involved in various kinds of rights such as gold mine, railroad, streetcar, electricity, telephone and water supply. For becoming U.S. Minister and maintaining U.S. Ministry as a person adhering to the royal family, Allen connected and mediated Emperor Gojong and American businessmen. Allen strived for the benefits of America and Americans, and regarded the Korean Empire as a rights market of America in negotiatians of rights.
참고문헌 (27)
- "알렌문서", 건양대학교 ‘근대 전환기 <알렌문서> 정리 해제 및 DB화’팀, ~
- "고종실록", ~
- "승정원일기", ~
- "朝美修好通商條約", 奎 23166, ~
- "구한국외교문서", <英案> 1, ~
- "주한일본공사관기록", ~
- "대한매일신보", ~
- "독립신문", ~
- "제국신문", ~
- "한성신보", ~
- 민영환, "海天秋帆" (1959), 을유문화사
- 崔璇, "國譯 韓國誌" (1984), 한국정신문화연구원
- 윤치호, "윤치호일기" (2001), 연세대학교 출판부
- 정교, "대한계년사" (1971), 국사편찬위원회
- 황현, "매천야록" (1994), 교문사
- H. N. Allen, "알렌의 日記: 舊韓末 激動期 秘史" (1991), 단국대 출판부
- 신용하, "독립협회연구" (1976), 일조각
- 정재정, "일제침략과 한국철도 1892-1945" (1999), 서울대 출판부
- 최덕수, "조약으로 본 한국근대사" (2010), 열린 책들
- 손정숙, "주한 미국공사 알렌(H. N. Allen)의 외교활동(1897-1905)", 이화사학연구, (31), pp.123~147 (2004), 이화사학연구소
- 이배용, "구한말 미국의 운산금광 채굴권 획득에 대하여", 역사학보, 50·51 (1971)
- 이영미, "을사조약 후 고종의 대미교섭 시도에 대한 알렌의 인식과 대응― 『알렌문서』 발굴 자료를 중심으로 ―", 한국근현대사연구, (82), pp.93~123 (2017), 한국근현대사학회
- 이윤상, "한국사 42 대한제국" (1999), 국사편찬위원회
- 장경호, "고종의 미관파천 시도와 한미관계(1894-1905)", 박사, pp.2018
- 장영숙, "『한성신보』의 고종과 명성황후에 대한 인식과 평가", 한국민족운동사연구, (93), pp.5~38 (2017), 한국민족운동사학회[DOI]
- 조재곤, "擇窩 허선도선생 정년기념 한국사학논총" (1992), 일조각
- 杉村濬, "在韓苦心錄" (1993), 건국대학교 출판부
