남송대 朱熹의 대외인식과 화이론
Zhu Xi’s Foreign View and Sino-Barbarian Theory in the Southern Song
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
During the Song(宋) dynasty, neighboring other ethnic countries such as Liao(遼,) Xi Xia(西夏), Jin(金), Yuan(元) were powerful. So they frequently invaded. Song and both Northern and Southern Songs were destroyed by them. On this background, to set up a relationship with those other ethnic countries, various discussions based on the Sino-Barbarian(華夷) theory had been developed. One of historical tasks of the Song period was to restore and establish political and ideological superiority and pride, through awakening the traditional sense of separation between the Chinese and the Barbarian. In the early Southern Song period, main stream’s perspective was that co-existence of Song and Jin cannot be established on the world view of Sino-Barbarian idea and traditional ‘Tian Xia(天下)’, which cannot accept the status of reversal between Jin and China. Zhu Xi(朱熹, 1103~1200), known as a collectivist of Neo-Confucianism, was active in the Southern Song Dynasty, when the harshest conflicts in Chinese history with the other ethnic countries existed. Since the Song dynasty, Northern ethnic regime gained such a power and became a huge threat to the Chinese. As the Chinese society faced such a chaos, traditional ethic orders were unprecedentedly destroyed. The ‘Tian Xia(天下)’ order, which places Han(漢) people in the center of the world, encountered a radical change and traditional Tian Xia view faced a great challenge. Also national consciousness of the Han people has never been raised before, due to the conflicts between the ethnic groups. Zhu Xi’s foreign view was established on such backgrounds. This study mainly explores Zhu Xi’s perspective on foreign country and the people, and his opinion of opposing the advocates of peace, which formed the foundation of such foreign view. Also the contents of orthodoxy and Sino-Barbarian theory, which is deeply related to Zhu Xi’s view, is considered. For Zhu Xi, criticizing the advocate of peace, he claimed that Barbarian(夷狄) is a creature which exists between a human and an animal, and it cannot be turned. Thus he emphasized Han people’s legitimacy, expressed a nation-state view based on the “China the Great” view, and reaffirmed the sense of superiority of traditional Chinese culture. Also he emphasized distinguish of Sino-Barbarian and brought Han people’s legitimacy into the prominence, to realize the Great China by the Han. His Neo-Confucianism was established as the governing ideology afterwards, which exerted a huge impact to the posterity.
Abstract
During the Song(宋) dynasty, neighboring other ethnic countries such as Liao(遼,) Xi Xia(西夏), Jin(金), Yuan(元) were powerful. So they frequently invaded. Song and both Northern and Southern Songs were destroyed by them. On this background, to set up a relationship with those other ethnic countries, various discussions based on the Sino-Barbarian(華夷) theory had been developed. One of historical tasks of the Song period was to restore and establish political and ideological superiority and pride, through awakening the traditional sense of separation between the Chinese and the Barbarian. In the early Southern Song period, main stream’s perspective was that co-existence of Song and Jin cannot be established on the world view of Sino-Barbarian idea and traditional ‘Tian Xia(天下)’, which cannot accept the status of reversal between Jin and China. Zhu Xi(朱熹, 1103~1200), known as a collectivist of Neo-Confucianism, was active in the Southern Song Dynasty, when the harshest conflicts in Chinese history with the other ethnic countries existed. Since the Song dynasty, Northern ethnic regime gained such a power and became a huge threat to the Chinese. As the Chinese society faced such a chaos, traditional ethic orders were unprecedentedly destroyed. The ‘Tian Xia(天下)’ order, which places Han(漢) people in the center of the world, encountered a radical change and traditional Tian Xia view faced a great challenge. Also national consciousness of the Han people has never been raised before, due to the conflicts between the ethnic groups. Zhu Xi’s foreign view was established on such backgrounds. This study mainly explores Zhu Xi’s perspective on foreign country and the people, and his opinion of opposing the advocates of peace, which formed the foundation of such foreign view. Also the contents of orthodoxy and Sino-Barbarian theory, which is deeply related to Zhu Xi’s view, is considered. For Zhu Xi, criticizing the advocate of peace, he claimed that Barbarian(夷狄) is a creature which exists between a human and an animal, and it cannot be turned. Thus he emphasized Han people’s legitimacy, expressed a nation-state view based on the “China the Great” view, and reaffirmed the sense of superiority of traditional Chinese culture. Also he emphasized distinguish of Sino-Barbarian and brought Han people’s legitimacy into the prominence, to realize the Great China by the Han. His Neo-Confucianism was established as the governing ideology afterwards, which exerted a huge impact to the posterity.
참고문헌 (35)
- 黎靖德, "朱子語類" (1986), 中華書局
- 朱傑人, "朱子全書(全, 27冊)" (2002), 安徽教育出版社
- 朱熹, "朱熹集" (1996), 四川敎育出版社
- 陳邦聸, "宋史紀事本末 全3冊" (1977), 中華書局
- 滄州樵叟, "四庫全書 第451卷"
- 脫脫, "宋史" (1975), 中華書局
- 費孝通, "中華民族多元一體格局" (1989), 中央民族學院出版社
- 田浩, "朱熹的思維世界" (1996), 允晨文化
- 華山, "宋史論集" (1982), 濟魯書社
- 寺地遵, "南宋初期政治史硏究" (1988), 溪水社
- 朴志焄, "南宋代 慶元黨禁과 韓侂冑", 京畿大學校 論文集, 38(1) (1996)
- 박지훈, "南宋 孝宗代 隆興和議와 和戰論", 東洋史學硏究, 61 (1998)
- 朴志焄, "南宋 高宗代 主戰派의 華夷論", 동양사학연구, 85, pp.2~99 (2003), 동양사학회
- 박지훈, "南宋中期 華夷論의 전개: 葉適과 陳亮을 중심으로", 宋遼金元史硏究, (8) (2003)
- 郭齊, "『資治通鑑綱目』的若干問題", 四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (6)통권 : 117 (2001)
- 宋晞, "朱熹的政治論", 宋史硏究集, 10 (1978)
- 梁寧森, "朱熹的民族氣節及對朱子學者的影響", 蘭台世界, 13 (2007)
- 楊靜靜, "朱熹蜀漢正統論", 宜春學院學報, 34(1) (2012)
- 嚴敏, "朱熹歷史觀新探", 理論界, (2) (2009)
- 汪高鑫, "朱熹正統論述評", 安徽敎育學院學報, (3)통권 : 42 (1992)
- 王德毅, "宋孝宗及其時代", 宋史論文集, 10 (1978)
- 李珍, "試論遼宋夏金時期的民族史觀", 史學月刊, (2) (2002)
- 張其凡, "試論宋代政治思想的發展", 中國史硏究, (1) (1993)
- 張博泉, "金宋和戰史論", 史學集刊, (2) (1984)
- 遲曉蕾, "朱熹『近思錄』回顧與相關的“中國意義”", 黨政幹部學刊, (9) (2016)
- 倉修良, "朱熹和『資治通鑑綱目』", 安徽史學, (1) (2007)
- 崔明德, "中國民族思想的概念及發展脈絡", 中國邊疆史地研究, 16(4) (2006)
- 漆俠, "宋學的發展和演變", 文史哲, (1) (1995)
- 湯勤福, "朱熹與『通鑑綱目』", 史學史硏究, (2) (1998)
- 黄太勇, "朱熹民族觀研究", 碩士, pp.2012
- 黃太勇, "論朱熹的“正統”觀", 牧丹江師範學院學報(哲社版), (3) (2012)
- 黃松筠, "華夷理論演變與中華民族形成", 社會科學戰線, (9) (2019)
- 土田健次郎, "朱熹的帝王學", 復旦學報(社會科學版), (1) (2019)
- 山內正博, "岩波講座 世界歷史 9卷" (1974), 岩波書店
- 衣川强, "秦檜の講和政策をめぐて", 東方學報, 45 (1973)
