본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선 초기 上王의 정치적 위상

The Status of the Abdicated King in the Early Joseon Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In the early Joseon dynasty, successive abdications of Kings were caused by competing for powers. However, King Taejong, who led to a series of events and came to the throne at last, stressed positively the political meaning of abdication. As abdication, understood as an ideal succession of the throne in the confucianism pursuing a wise monarch, a king who succeeded to the throne could build an image of a wise sovereign. It was the first time when the grand abdicated king, the abdicated king, and the current king co-existed, and their relationship intertwined with ethics of parental and sibling relations and political powers, became more complicated. King Taejong tried to bow and to take a toast to the grand abdicated king longevity of his father, the grand abdicated king, but the father avoided his son, the current king. Then, in the second year of King Taejong(1402), Josaeui’s conspiracy, considered with involvement of King Taejo, the grand abdicated King Taejo should return to the capital Kaekyung, after going out for longtime. And King Taejong improved his relationship with his father, making his own image as a dutiful son-king to his father-abdicated king. At that time, King Taejong started to consider his own abdication. He already supplemented his lack of legitimacy of kingship through treating both the grand abdicated king and the abdicated king with ‘duties for parents and siblings’. First of all, he experienced no case of succession to the throne in accordance with the former king's own will in history of China and Korea. Of course, he had to make his third son, the Prince Choongnyeong as his successor because of his first son, the Prince Yangnyeong's bad behaviors, he could secure his own right cause of selecting a wise one in the process. It was different from his former thought of succession to the throne by the first son. But when he abdicated, he could stress the meaning of abdication with ‘selecting a wise one’. King Taejong was recorded for his act to abdicate compared to that of the legendary Chinese King Yáo-Shùn. And his choice of his third son who was wise with ethics of parental and sibling relations instead of the first son who lacked virtues maximized political efficiency of his abdication. King Taejong arranged specifically institutions related to the abdicated king and built royal palaces around the capital, showing powerful status of the abdicated king. Then, succeeding his father suddenly with the title of a wise ruler, King Sejong had to depend on the father-king for some part of ruling including military power. However, he practiced more dutifully his respect for the father-king, establishing his image as a wise king.

Abstract

In the early Joseon dynasty, successive abdications of Kings were caused by competing for powers. However, King Taejong, who led to a series of events and came to the throne at last, stressed positively the political meaning of abdication. As abdication, understood as an ideal succession of the throne in the confucianism pursuing a wise monarch, a king who succeeded to the throne could build an image of a wise sovereign. It was the first time when the grand abdicated king, the abdicated king, and the current king co-existed, and their relationship intertwined with ethics of parental and sibling relations and political powers, became more complicated. King Taejong tried to bow and to take a toast to the grand abdicated king longevity of his father, the grand abdicated king, but the father avoided his son, the current king. Then, in the second year of King Taejong(1402), Josaeui’s conspiracy, considered with involvement of King Taejo, the grand abdicated King Taejo should return to the capital Kaekyung, after going out for longtime. And King Taejong improved his relationship with his father, making his own image as a dutiful son-king to his father-abdicated king. At that time, King Taejong started to consider his own abdication. He already supplemented his lack of legitimacy of kingship through treating both the grand abdicated king and the abdicated king with ‘duties for parents and siblings’. First of all, he experienced no case of succession to the throne in accordance with the former king's own will in history of China and Korea. Of course, he had to make his third son, the Prince Choongnyeong as his successor because of his first son, the Prince Yangnyeong's bad behaviors, he could secure his own right cause of selecting a wise one in the process. It was different from his former thought of succession to the throne by the first son. But when he abdicated, he could stress the meaning of abdication with ‘selecting a wise one’. King Taejong was recorded for his act to abdicate compared to that of the legendary Chinese King Yáo-Shùn. And his choice of his third son who was wise with ethics of parental and sibling relations instead of the first son who lacked virtues maximized political efficiency of his abdication. King Taejong arranged specifically institutions related to the abdicated king and built royal palaces around the capital, showing powerful status of the abdicated king. Then, succeeding his father suddenly with the title of a wise ruler, King Sejong had to depend on the father-king for some part of ruling including military power. However, he practiced more dutifully his respect for the father-king, establishing his image as a wise king.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김윤주, "조선 태조∼태종대 정치와 정치세력", 박사, 국사학, pp.2011
  2. 김윤주, "조선 초기 遷都와 移御의 정치사 - 수도 한양의 위상 강화 과정을 중심으로 -", 서울학연구, (45), pp.2~28 (2011), 서울학연구소
  3. 류주희, "조선 태종대 정치세력 연구", 박사, ?, pp.2001
  4. 민현구, "朝鮮 太祖代의 國政運營과 君臣共治", 史叢, 61 (2005)
  5. 민현구, "조선 世宗代 초엽의 兩王體制와 國政運營", 역사민속학, (22), pp.61~85 (2006), 한국역사민속학회
  6. 문재윤, "조선조 왕실의 '제가(齊家)론'과 그 정치적 함의", 영남학, (12), pp.193~229 (2007), 영남문화연구원
  7. 박례경, "德治의 상징체계로서 유교국가의 卽位儀禮 - 덕치와 왕권확립, 그 길항관계의 의례적 구성과 그 해석 -", 한국실학연구, (21), pp.149~200 (2011), 한국실학학회
  8. 安俊嬉, "朝鮮初期 太宗의 執權過程과 趙思義의 亂", 外大史學, 5 (1993)
  9. 연세대학교 국학연구원, "중세사회의 변화와 조선 건국" (2005), 혜안
  10. 오영교, "조선 건국과 경국대전체제의 형성" (2004), 혜안
  11. 유재리, "世宗初 兩上統治期의 國政運營", 조선시대사학보, (36), pp.5~65 (2006), 조선시대사학회
  12. 윤정, "세종 초 上王(太宗)의 궁궐경영과 그 정치적 의미 - 壽康宮·豊壤離宮을 중심으로 -", 서울학연구, (41), pp.99~137 (2010), 서울학연구소
  13. 李益柱, "高麗ㆍ元關係의 構造와 高麗後期 政治體制", 박사, pp.1996
  14. 李泰鎭, "朝鮮王朝의 儒敎政治와 王權", 韓國史論, 23 (1990)
  15. 장현근, "방벌(放伐)과 선양(禪讓)의 이중주: 초기 유가사상의 정권에 대한 정당화", 한국정치학회보, 46(1), pp.5~24 (2012), 한국정치학회
  16. 鄭杜熙, "朝鮮初期 政治支配勢力硏究" (1983), 一潮閣
  17. 정재서, "禪讓인가? 簒奪인가? - 고대 중국의 왕권신화에 대한 해체론적 접근 -", 중국어문학, (54), pp.1~20 (2009), 영남중국어문학회
  18. 崔承熙, "李載龒博士還曆紀念韓國史學論叢" (1990), 한울
  19. 최형보, "肅宗代 王世子 代理聽政 硏究", 韓國史論, 60 (2014)
  20. 한충희, "上王期(세종 즉위, 1418∼세종 4, 1422) 太宗硏究", 大丘史學, 58 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)