17세기 중엽 조선에 표류한 鄭成功 계열 海商에 대한 조선 지배층의 인식과 그 성격
Revealed Vulnerability of a Successor of Sino-Centrism, Joseon in the Late Seventeenth Century:An Encounter with Castaways in 1667 from Zheng’s Maritime Kingdom
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The family of Zheng Chenggong(鄭成功) was a maritime trading force in the seventeenth century based on the southern coast of China encompassing South Asia and Japan and ultimately became a Ming loyalist resisting the conquest of Manchus and settling in Formosa(Taiwan). The emergence of Zheng’s power was taking advantage of the rupture during this transitional period from Ming to Qing. It seems that Joseon was alienated from the trading network connecting South Asia, Southern China and Japan that Zheng established. In the early seventeenth century, Joseon was more desperate to maintain the regime and reconstruct their worldview after the devastating wars with Japan and Manchus. Joseon should adapt to the oppressive relation with the Qing on the one hand, but on the other hand, in the crisis of representing the state, Joseon claimed herself as a legitimate successor of the Sino-centrism to recover from the diplomatic humiliation. Under these circumstances, the existence of Zheng was informed fragmentarily to Joseon through varied routes and castaways claiming to be part of Zhengs’ force. On one hand, the castaways could be welcomed by many Confucian literati in Joseon because they were regarded as physical symbols to imagine the restoration of the Ming. Confucian literati of Joseon did not consider the castaways as pirates or sea merchants but rather a symbol of Ming loyalists who should be protected by Joseon, a successor of Sino-centrism. On the other hand, Joseon court was embarrassed to deal with these castaways claiming as Ming loyalists because the court should consider the reality of the oppressive relation with Qing. That is, the rupture of the court’s representation as a successor of the Sino-centrism is revealed through the physicality of the castaways. Although the court promoted the Confucian literati’s desire toward the restoration of the Ming, the court became very uncomfortable when they actually had to face and deal with castaways in reality. This tension between the court and literati caused by castaways is well revealed in 1667 when the court decided to transfer ninety five castaways shipwrecked in Jeju Island to the Qing dynasty. The castaways were claiming themselves as trading force that belonged to Zheng Jing(鄭經), a successive son of Zheng Chenggong. The decision provoked a huge controversy inside and outside the court and the controversy could be intensified by the local officials’ and Joseon literati’s direct contacts with castaways at a place the ship drifted and on the way to the capital after the decision of transfer was made. Through the analysis of sources based on the dialogues between Joseon literati and the castaways(漂人問答), the anxiety and complexities of Joseon’s reconstruction of the worldview and their identity under the changing world order in the seventeenth century could be elucidated.
Abstract
The family of Zheng Chenggong(鄭成功) was a maritime trading force in the seventeenth century based on the southern coast of China encompassing South Asia and Japan and ultimately became a Ming loyalist resisting the conquest of Manchus and settling in Formosa(Taiwan). The emergence of Zheng’s power was taking advantage of the rupture during this transitional period from Ming to Qing. It seems that Joseon was alienated from the trading network connecting South Asia, Southern China and Japan that Zheng established. In the early seventeenth century, Joseon was more desperate to maintain the regime and reconstruct their worldview after the devastating wars with Japan and Manchus. Joseon should adapt to the oppressive relation with the Qing on the one hand, but on the other hand, in the crisis of representing the state, Joseon claimed herself as a legitimate successor of the Sino-centrism to recover from the diplomatic humiliation. Under these circumstances, the existence of Zheng was informed fragmentarily to Joseon through varied routes and castaways claiming to be part of Zhengs’ force. On one hand, the castaways could be welcomed by many Confucian literati in Joseon because they were regarded as physical symbols to imagine the restoration of the Ming. Confucian literati of Joseon did not consider the castaways as pirates or sea merchants but rather a symbol of Ming loyalists who should be protected by Joseon, a successor of Sino-centrism. On the other hand, Joseon court was embarrassed to deal with these castaways claiming as Ming loyalists because the court should consider the reality of the oppressive relation with Qing. That is, the rupture of the court’s representation as a successor of the Sino-centrism is revealed through the physicality of the castaways. Although the court promoted the Confucian literati’s desire toward the restoration of the Ming, the court became very uncomfortable when they actually had to face and deal with castaways in reality. This tension between the court and literati caused by castaways is well revealed in 1667 when the court decided to transfer ninety five castaways shipwrecked in Jeju Island to the Qing dynasty. The castaways were claiming themselves as trading force that belonged to Zheng Jing(鄭經), a successive son of Zheng Chenggong. The decision provoked a huge controversy inside and outside the court and the controversy could be intensified by the local officials’ and Joseon literati’s direct contacts with castaways at a place the ship drifted and on the way to the capital after the decision of transfer was made. Through the analysis of sources based on the dialogues between Joseon literati and the castaways(漂人問答), the anxiety and complexities of Joseon’s reconstruction of the worldview and their identity under the changing world order in the seventeenth century could be elucidated.
참고문헌 (31)
- "仁祖實錄", ~
- "孝宗實錄", ~
- "顯宗實錄", ~
- "肅宗實錄", ~
- "承政院日記", ~
- "硏經齋全集外集卷, 卷33-34, 丁未傳信錄, 問答 上ㆍ下", ~
- 강진아, "동아시아의 지역질서 : 제국을 넘어 공동체로" (2005), 창비
- 김문식, "成海應이 증보한『丁未傳信錄』", 진단학보, (115), pp.93~122 (2012), 진단학회
- JINLAN, "민족주의 경합의 장으로서의 ‘정성공(鄭成功)’ 역사영웅 만들기", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (104), pp.107~144 (2014), 한국사회사학회
- 김영원, "항해와 표류의 역사" (2003), 솔
- 민덕기, "동아시아 해금정책의 변화와 해양 경계에서의 분쟁", 한일관계사연구, (42), pp.189~228 (2012), 한일관계사학회
- 박현규, "1688년 조선 州島에 표착한 潮州 출항선 기록 검토", 동북아 문화연구, 1(14), pp.29~46 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회
- 신동규, "근세 표류민의 송환유형과 국제관계", 강원사학, 17 (2002)
- 안드레 군더 프랑크, "리오리엔트" (2011), 이산
- 우경섭, "조선후기 지식인들의 南明王朝 인식", 한국문화, (61), pp.133~155 (2013), 규장각한국학연구원
- 우경섭, "조선중화주의의 성립과 동아시아" (2013), 유니스토리
- 우인수, "17세기 후반 臺灣 鄭氏海上勢力에 대한 조선의 정보 수집과 그 의미", 대구사학, 100, pp.163~187 (2010), 대구사학회
- 원정식, "청초 복건 반청세력의 흥쇠", 강원사학, 17 (2002)
- 元廷植, "淸初 福建社會와 遷界令 實施", 동양사학연구, 81, pp.2~78 (2003), 동양사학회
- 원종민, "조선에 표류한 중국인의 유형과 그 사회적 영향", 중국학연구, (44), pp.225~260 (2008), 중국학연구회
- 정응수, "정성공(鄭成功) 일가에 대한 조선정부의 인식 변화 -『조선왕조실록』을 중심으로-", 일어일문학, (55), pp.435~453 (2012), 대한일어일문학회
- 채경수, "명청교체기 해상권력의 동향-정성공세력의 항청활동을 중심으로", 서울대 동양사학과 논집, 29 (2005)
- 최관, "정성공(鄭成功)과 동아시아 ―지카마쓰(近松)의 『고쿠센야 갓센(国性爺合戦)』을 중심으로―", 일본학보, (74), pp.331~338 (2008), 한국일본학회
- 최성환, "조선후기 문순득의 표류노정과 송환체제", 한국민족문화, (43), pp.189~233 (2012), 한국민족문화연구소[DOI]
- 전해종, "한중관계사 연구" (1980), 일조각
- 조너선 클레멘츠, "해적왕 정성공" (2008), 삼우반
- 하정식, "태평천국과 조선왕조" (2008), 지식산업사
- 한국역사연구회 17세기 정치사 연구반, "조선중기 정치와 정책: 인조~현종 시기" (2003), 아카넷
- 한지선, "明末 鄭芝龍의 海上制覇 過程", 명청사연구, (34), pp.89~112 (2010), 명청사학회
- 浜下武志, "アヅア交易圈と日本工業化" (2001), 藤原書店
- Tonio Andrade, "How Taiwan Became Chinese: Dutch, Spanish, and Han colonization in the seventeenth century" (2008), Columbia University Press
