Law and Knowledge - remarks on a debate in German legal science
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The relationship between law and knowledge is a new topic in the field of legal science, and it is dealt with in particular in public law as sub-discipline of law. The topic is definitely not new with regard to other scientific domains. Thus law might be seen as a late comer. This article intends to outline some aspects of the current discussion to provide the essential groundwork on the topic, initially by explaining why the interrelation between law and knowledge might be important. This article does not cover aspects of knowledge as an object of law, which is often discussed under this headline but focusses on more basic aspects of the relationship between knowledge and law that may summarized in the hypothesis that law shapes knowledge but also that knowledge shapes the law. Following an introduction on how ‘knowledge’ is to be defined as a term, the discourse moves on to examine law as a practice through which knowledge is constantly generated in multiple manners, while, immediately afterwards the different typologies of knowledge, from the most tangible (through experience and conventions) to the most articulate ones (through European administrative networks) are presented. It reveals an important requirement of creating a European Administrative space, which is a shared knowledge base where administrative actions are embedded in. Even if it may come as a surprise to some, ignorance, as the opposite of knowledge, can also be a process or element that plays a role in law generation, as the article further argues. Last but not least, an analysis of the preconditions necessary for observing the law and knowledge conundrum either under conditions of awareness or of ignorance is provided.
Abstract
The relationship between law and knowledge is a new topic in the field of legal science, and it is dealt with in particular in public law as sub-discipline of law. The topic is definitely not new with regard to other scientific domains. Thus law might be seen as a late comer. This article intends to outline some aspects of the current discussion to provide the essential groundwork on the topic, initially by explaining why the interrelation between law and knowledge might be important. This article does not cover aspects of knowledge as an object of law, which is often discussed under this headline but focusses on more basic aspects of the relationship between knowledge and law that may summarized in the hypothesis that law shapes knowledge but also that knowledge shapes the law. Following an introduction on how ‘knowledge’ is to be defined as a term, the discourse moves on to examine law as a practice through which knowledge is constantly generated in multiple manners, while, immediately afterwards the different typologies of knowledge, from the most tangible (through experience and conventions) to the most articulate ones (through European administrative networks) are presented. It reveals an important requirement of creating a European Administrative space, which is a shared knowledge base where administrative actions are embedded in. Even if it may come as a surprise to some, ignorance, as the opposite of knowledge, can also be a process or element that plays a role in law generation, as the article further argues. Last but not least, an analysis of the preconditions necessary for observing the law and knowledge conundrum either under conditions of awareness or of ignorance is provided.
참고문헌 (63)
- Albers, M., "Generierung und Transfer staatlichen Wissens im System des Verwaltungsrechts", pp.50~72 (2008), Mohr Siebeck
- Albers, M., "Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts. Volume II", pp.107~234 (2012), Beck
- Appel, I., "Methoden der Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft" (2004), Nomos
- Augsberg, I., "Informationsverwaltungsrecht" (2014), Mohr Siebeck
- Augsberg, S., "Der Staat als Informationsmittler – Robin Hood oder Parasit der Wissensgesellschaft", Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt, 733~741 (2007)
- Berger, P., "The Social Construction of Reality" (1966), Random House
- Briggs, A., "A Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the Internet" (2009), Polity
- Broemel, R., "Wissen – zur kognitiven Dimension des Rechts. Die Verwaltung, Beiheft 9", pp.89~112 (2010), Duncker & Humblot
- Broemel, R., "Rechtswissenschaft 1", pp.62~90 (2013)
- Broemel, R., "Wissen und Nichtwissen in Organisation und Netzwerken"
- Burke, P., "A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot" (2000), Polity
- Burke, P., "A Social History of Knowledge Volume II: From the Encyclopedia to Wikipedia" (2012), Polity
- Folke Schuppert, G., "Governance von und durch Wissen" (2008), Nomos
- Peter Menell, "Forthcoming, Research Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law (Vol. II – Analytical Methods)" (2016), Edward Elgar Publishing
- Frické, M., "Big Data and its epistemology", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), pp.651~661 (2015)
- Knowledge Commons, "Frischmann M. B.", PittLaw, ~, pp.Working Paper No. 2016 (2016)
- Gugerli, D., "Nach Feierabend. Zürcher Jahrbuch für Wissensgeschichte. Band 5: Nicht-Wissen", Diaphanes
- Harremoes, P., "The Precautionry Principle in the 20th Century" (2002)
- Harenburg, J., "Entfremdete Wissenschaft", pp.56~ (1979)
- Hoffmann-Riem, W., "Die Wissenschaft vom Verwaltungsrecht, Die Verwaltung, Beiheft 2", pp.83~87 (1999)
- Japp, K. P., "Soziologische Risikotheorie. Funktionale Differenzierung, Politisierung und Reflexion" (1996), Juventa
- Ladeur, K. -H., "Rechtliches Risikomanagement" (1999), Duncker &Humblot
- Ladeur, K. -H., "Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts. Volume II", pp.35~106 (2012), Beck
- Ladeur, K. -H., "Die Gesellschaft der Daten", pp.225~252 (2015), Transcript
- Ladeur, K-H., "Das Umweltrecht der Wissensgesellschaft" (1995), Duncker & Humblot
- Lee, K. I., "Die Struktur der juristischen Entscheidung aus konstruktivistischer Sicht" (2010), Mohr Siebeck
- Luhmann, N., "Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft" (1992), Suhrkamp
- Luhmann, N., "Organisation und Entscheidung" (2000), Westdt. Verlag
- Merton, R. K., "The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action", American Sociological Review, 1(6), pp.894~904 (1936)
- Merton, R. K., "Three Fragments from a Sociologist’s Notebook:Establishing the Phenomenon. Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials", Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), pp.1~29 (1987)
- Moore, W. E., "Some social functions of ignorance", American Sociological Review, 14(6), pp.787~795 (1949)
- Müller, F., "Juristische Methodik. Band I" (2013), Duncker & Humblot
- Nassehi, A., "Nicht wissen, Kursbuch 180" (2014), Murmann
- Oeter, S., "Transnational Administrative Rule-Making" (2011), Hart Publishing
- Pflug, M., "Pandemievorsorge - informationelle und kognitive Regelungsstrukturen" (2013), Duncker & Humblot
- Pilniok, A., "Governance im europäischen Forschungsverbund" (2011), Mohr Siebeck
- Popitz, H., "Über die Präventivwirkung des Nichtwissens" (1968), Mohr
- Reiling, K., "Der Hybride. Administrative Wissensorganisation im privaten Bereich" (2016), Mohr Siebeck
- Röhl, H. C., "Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts. Volume II", pp.731~798 (2012), Beck
- Röhl, H. C., "Wissen - Zur kognitiven Dimension des Rechts. Die Verwaltung, Beiheft 9" (2010), Duncker & Humblot
- Scherzberg, A., "Wissen –Nichtwissen – Unsicheres Wissen" (2002), Nomos
- Scherzberg, A., "Risikosteuerung durch Verwaltungsrecht:Ermöglichung oder Begrenzung von Innovationen?", Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 63, pp.216~258 (2004)
- Schulze-Fielitz, H., "The Public Nature of Science under Assault" (2005), Springer
- Simmel, G., "Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung" (1992), Duncker & Humblot
- Spieker genannt Döhmann, I., "Generierung und Transfer staatlichen Wissens im System des Verwaltungsrechts" (2008), Mohr Siebeck
- Stegmaier, P., "Wissen, was Recht ist. Richterliche Rechtspraxis aus wissenssoziologischer Sicht" (2009), VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
- Trute, H. -H., "From Past to Future Risk – From Public to Private Law", European Review of Public Law, 15(1), pp.73~103 (2003)
- Trute, H. -H., "The Public Nature of Science under Assault", pp.87~108 (2005), Springer
- Trute, H. -H., "Wissen - zur kognitiven Dimension des Rechts. Die Verwaltung, Beiheft 9", pp.11~38 (2010), Duncker & Humblot
- Trute, H.-H., "International Law and the Rule of Law under Extreme Conditions" (2015)
- Trute, H. -H., "Governance in der Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft", Die Verwaltung, pp.451~473 (2004)
- Upmeier, A., "Fakten im Recht" (2010), Nomos
- Valverde, M., "Law’s Dream of a Common Knowledge" (2003), Princeton University Press
- Voßkuhle, A., "Handbuch des Staatsrechts. Volume III", pp.425~476 (2005), Müller
- Voßkuhle, A., "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht – zur Tragfähigkeit eines Konzepts", pp.637~664 (2008), Mohr Siebeck
- Wahl, R., "Herausforderungen und Antworten: Das Öffentliche Recht der letzten fünf Jahrzehnte" (2006), de Gruyter
- Wahl, R., "Prävention und Vorsorge", pp.1~ (1995)
- Wehling, P., "Im Schatten des Wissens? Perspektiven der Soziologie des Nichtwissens" (2006), UVK-Verlagsgesellschaft
- Wehling, P., "Handbuch “Wissenssoziologie und Wissensforschung", pp.485~494 (2007), UVK-Verlagsgesellschaft
- Wehling, P., "Handbuch “Wissenssoziologie und Wissensforschung.”", pp.704~712 (2007), UVK-Verlagsgesellschaft
- Wehling, P., "Vom Nutzen des Nichtwissens" (2016), Transcript Bielfeld
- Wittgenstein, L., "Philosophische Untersuchungen" (2003), Suhrkamp
- Wollenschläger, B., "Wissensgenerierung im Verfahren" (2009), Mohr Siebeck