거란의 통치사상 ― 유학을 중심으로 ―
The Idea of Governing in Liao Dynasty — Focusing on the Confucianism —
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Liao(遼) Dynasty(916~1125), established by Khitay, a nomadic tribe, was largely based on the military force. In search of a proper way to govern, Confucianism was spread by Khitan sovereign rulers. Confucianism had a considerable effect on maintaining the reign, expanding territory and stabilizing domestic situations. Research by Chinese scholars generally insist that China is an unified, multi-racial nation throughout history, and that era of Song-Liao had great contribution on the history of multi races. On such ‘union of races’ point of view, Hanhua(漢化), being assimilated into Han, is emphasized. Adopting Confucianism by Khitan is regarded as a process of Hanhua. This paper aims to study the cause of using Confucianism on ruling of Liao, on an objective view. It also tries to look into the adaptation process-on perspective of governor’s pursuing of Confucianism, education and state examination system, and civil reformation, respectively. Early rulers started taking the Confucianism, which had great advance in Sheng zong(聖宗) and Xing zong(興宗) period. In the days of Dao zong(道宗), Confucianism was fully flourished. Despite Liao Dynasty had embraced the Confucianism of Han zu, its sovereign ideology and policy had a shield to protect the traits of Khitan. It is seen on “Ruling by custom” policy, which is for protecting Khitan ethnicity, that Confucianism had been adopted independently. It is considered natural that adopting Chinese ideology and governing methods, since nomadic tribal system and philosophy is not sufficient to establish a dynasty and maintain its public order. Especially it is inevitable to rule the Han’s residence area. However, it is not proper to conclude that they are assimilated to Han tribe, which is discrete from recent Chinese literature.
Abstract
The Liao(遼) Dynasty(916~1125), established by Khitay, a nomadic tribe, was largely based on the military force. In search of a proper way to govern, Confucianism was spread by Khitan sovereign rulers. Confucianism had a considerable effect on maintaining the reign, expanding territory and stabilizing domestic situations. Research by Chinese scholars generally insist that China is an unified, multi-racial nation throughout history, and that era of Song-Liao had great contribution on the history of multi races. On such ‘union of races’ point of view, Hanhua(漢化), being assimilated into Han, is emphasized. Adopting Confucianism by Khitan is regarded as a process of Hanhua. This paper aims to study the cause of using Confucianism on ruling of Liao, on an objective view. It also tries to look into the adaptation process-on perspective of governor’s pursuing of Confucianism, education and state examination system, and civil reformation, respectively. Early rulers started taking the Confucianism, which had great advance in Sheng zong(聖宗) and Xing zong(興宗) period. In the days of Dao zong(道宗), Confucianism was fully flourished. Despite Liao Dynasty had embraced the Confucianism of Han zu, its sovereign ideology and policy had a shield to protect the traits of Khitan. It is seen on “Ruling by custom” policy, which is for protecting Khitan ethnicity, that Confucianism had been adopted independently. It is considered natural that adopting Chinese ideology and governing methods, since nomadic tribal system and philosophy is not sufficient to establish a dynasty and maintain its public order. Especially it is inevitable to rule the Han’s residence area. However, it is not proper to conclude that they are assimilated to Han tribe, which is discrete from recent Chinese literature.
참고문헌 (22)
- "全遼文" (1982), 中華書局
- 江少, "宋朝事實類苑" (1981), 上海古籍出版社
- 葉隆禮, "契丹國志" (1985), 上海古籍出版社
- 李燾, "續資治通鑑長編" (1985), 中華書局
- 趙翼, "二十二史箚記" (1968), 世界書局
- 脫脫, "遼史" (1975), 中華書局
- 金渭顯, "契丹社會文化史論" (2004), 경인문화사
- 류영표, "북방민족과 중원왕조의 민족인식" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 日本東亞硏究所, "이민족의 중국통치사" (1991), 대륙연구소 출판부
- 박지훈, "송요시기 민족융합론에 대한 시각과 비판 : 최근 중국의 연구성과를 중심으로", 역사문화연구, (35), pp.163~198 (2010), 역사문화연구소
- 박지훈, "遼의 自國에 대한 인식과 중국관", 역사문화연구, (48), pp.41~72 (2013), 역사문화연구소
- 이석현, "북방민족과 중원왕조의 민족인식" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 賈雲飛, "探導遼代儒學敎育的發展,興盛及其衰落成因", 蘭臺世界 (2014)
- 顧宏義, "遼代儒學傳播與敎育的發展", 華東師範大學學報(敎育科學版) (1998)
- 屈文軍, "論中國歷史上的北方民族政權:以遼西夏金元四祖爲重點", 西北民族硏究, 통권 : 49 (2006)
- 武玉環, "遼代儒學的發展及其歷史作用", 吉林大學社會科學學報 (1996)
- 宋德金, "遼金史論集 1輯" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 宋德金, "征服王朝論", 社會科學戰線 (2010)
- 鄭毅, "遼朝統治者的“崇儒”理念與政治實踐", 理論學 (2014)
- 陳述, "遼金史論集 1輯" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 叢漵洋, "儒學在遼代的傳播及其影響和作用", 瀋陽師範大學學報(社會科學版), 38통권 : 184 (2014)
- 西順藏, "中國思想論集" (1969), 筑摩書房
