본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

关于《中庸》首章“率性之谓道”朱子与茶山注释的对比硏究

Zhu Xi and Tasan’s Interpretations on the Doctrine of the Means : Focusing on the Phrase“To Follow Nature is Called Nature”

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

儒学思想是由四书五经等儒教经典形成的,因而在中国和韩国等儒教文化圈中,每次历史上发生划时代的变化时,就会有新的经典注释产生。茶山将整个六经四书从全新的角度去注释,这是因其生活的时代与以前的时代相比发生了质的变化。他的经典解释学是综合了训诂学的方法和心性论的课题,在新的立场上进行扬弃,为朝鲜时代的经学史铸就了划时代的业绩。茶山对于《中庸》第1章:“率性之谓道”这一命题的注释,同朱子对这一命题的注释进行对比分析后,本论文得出如下结论:1.朱子将该命题视为规范原理的定立,茶山则将此看作是为实现本性的修养学习。2.朱子视之为遵循本然之性的‘理’,而茶山则认为它是遵循人类好善厌恶的先验性的·道德性的心(情感、意志)。3.朱子将道视为人和事物的普遍性规范原理,而茶山则仅将此视之为人的道德规范,事物应除外。朱子是站在构建道德形而上学的根据的立场上,而茶山是站在强化道德在现实世界中实践性的立场上,这也就是二者产生上述差异的原因。

Abstract

The basis for Confucian thought is the Classics represented by the Four Books and Five Classics. Whenever radical changes take place in history, there would naturally arise new interpretation on the same old Classics. The reason why Tasan interpreted the Classics from a whole new perspective is also due to his time that went through significant changes. He left a notable achievement within Korean history of Classics through his unique commentaries that synthesized the issues within theories of mind and nature with the methods from evidential studies. The main characteristic of Tasan's commentaries can be summarized as 'anti-Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism.' When Zhu Xi's interpretation happened to correspond to Tasan's own ideas, however, he did not hesitate to embrace it as to become a part of his philosophical framework. In Tasan's system of interpretation, therefore, there not only are 'criticisms' toward Neo-Confucianism represented by Zhu Xi, but also is 'inheritance' from them. From such a perspective, this article analyzes the difference between Tasan and Zhu Xi, especially on their commentaries of the phrase "to follow nature is called the Way(率性之謂道)" in the first chapter of the Doctrine of the Way (中庸). The analysis begot the following outcome:1. Zhu Xi saw the phrase as a kind of normative principle, while Tasan regarded it as the method of self-cultivation that would help actualize one's nature. 2. Zhu Xi saw the object of following to be the principle li which is our original nature, while Tasan interpreted it to be the innate moral mind (emotion, will) that likes good and hates evil. 3. Zhu Xi saw the Tao to be the general, normative principle common to human and things, while Tasan stressed it to be the moral rules applicable only to humans. Such differences seem to be founded upon the chasm between Zhu Xi's aim, that is to build the basis of moral metaphysics and Tasan's endeavor to bring about more actual, concrete practices on morality within our everyday, real life.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. "中庸", ~
  2. "诗经", ~
  3. 朱熹, "中庸章句", ~
  4. "中庸章句大全", ~
  5. "中庸或问", ~
  6. "朱子语类", ~
  7. "论语集注", ~
  8. "孟子集注", ~
  9. 丁若镛, "中庸自箴", ~
  10. "中庸讲义补", ~
  11. "孟子要义", ~
  12. "论语古今注", ~
  13. "诗经讲义", ~
  14. 韩元震, "经义记闻录", 经义记闻录
  15. 琴章泰, "丁若镛–韩国实学的集大成" (2002), 成均馆大学出版社
  16. 徐迥遥, "朝鲜儒学者的中庸" (2009), 文史哲出版社
  17. 林玉均, "王夫之的<中庸>解释(1)-以和朱子的注释比较为中心", 东洋哲学研究, 48 (2006)
  18. 郑炳连, "茶山<中庸>注的经学研究", 박사, pp.1998
  19. 郑一均, "茶山经学思想研究" (2000), 一志社
  20. 崔英辰, "儒教思想的本质和现代性" (2003), 儒教文化研究所
  21. 崔英辰, "朝鲜朝儒学思想史的特征" (2005), 成均馆大学出版部
  22. 崔英辰, "韩国哲学史" (2009), 新文社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)