본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

关于韩国近代主体的研究 ——以自强运动时期的申采浩和朴殷植为中心

A Study on the Subject of Modernization in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

中文提要:面对强有力的他者——西方的时候,我们只会内在的反复发问 “我究竟是谁”。面对异质文化的西方近代,朴殷植和申采浩都主张积极吸收西 方文化,同时也要对儒教传统进行批判性继承,以此来确立韩国的近代主体地 位。与西方视理性的个人为主体不同,朴殷植和申采浩提出了新国民作为韩国的 近代主体。他们认为国家和民族的生存是保全个人生存之路,因此对于市民社会 的主体——个人没有赋予强有力的意义。他们认为新国民的集团觉醒是恢复国权 和实现独立的优先要务。他们提出的新国民不是独立的个体,而是国家民族的成 员,具有强有力的集团意识,还要实现良知、新道德等道德的觉醒和实践。另 外,朴殷植的道德良知以及申采浩的固有朝鲜的主体性都与儒教有着密切的联 系。朴殷植关注良知学以及申采浩肯定儒教扩张论都是从近代这一大的时代背景 下来重新诠释和改革儒教的新尝试。他们通过对儒教的批判和继承来确保了朝鲜 的主体性,并提出只有不丧失主体性才能够实现主体的文明化和独立。因此他们 既批判儒教又继承儒教的做法并不矛盾,而是近代朝鲜的主体对应激烈变化的社 会现实来实现自我成熟的过程。

Abstract

The Modern Age is called as the era of Eastern Penetration of the West(西势东渐). This terminology reveals clearly the shocks of the Modern Western Culture. When we faced strong others(他者), that is, Western Cultures, we had to asked serious question of "Who am I" to oneself. And when the fact to meet others, that is, Western, accompanied the invasion of the imperialism it is natural the Eastern to have the instinct self-defense. Shin Chae-ho(申采浩) and Park Eun-sik(朴殷植) which experienced heterogenious others, Modern Western tried to make essential Korean Modern subject through acceptance of the Modern Western and also critique and accession of the Confucianism. It is natural to call the Modern Western Culture as rationality, so Modern Western rationality have characteristics which means the liberalization of the mythological view of the world and traditional restriction. In the Middle Ages which human rationality was granted the status of Divinity, the core of the Modernity was the subjectivity. But Korean Modernity which confronted the invasion of imperialism tried to accept advantages of the Western Modernity and also tried to solve the problems of the Eastern modernity which different from Western Modernity. Shin Chae-ho and Park Eun-sikpresented the identity of New Nationality(新国民) as the national correspondent subject rather than rational identity. The New Nationality which they represented required the moral awakening and practice and also attached importance of collective body. And also Natural Moral Knowledge(良知) of Park Eun sik and Natural Subjectivity of Joseon(朝鲜) were closely related with Confucianism. But they tried to change this Confucianism to contribute to constitute New Nationality. They thought the subjectivity of the Joseon will be concreted by succession of Confucianism. So the fact that they tried to critique and succeed the Confucianism means the process of self-realization and self-maturity.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "孟子"
  2. "中庸"
  3. "???"
  4. 丹?申采浩全集, "丹?申采浩先生?念事??" (1987)
  5. 朴殷植全?, "檀?大??洋??究所" (1975)
  6. 金?基等, "?代性是什?" (1994), 首?:民印社
  7. 朴正心, "?朴殷植思想??的考察???朱子?到?明?" (1999), ??思想史?
  8. 朴正心, "?于申采浩儒???的?究??以近代的主????主" (2004), ??思想史?
  9. 朴正心, "??近代知?分子的近代意?" (2007), ?洋哲??究
  10. ???, "金炯?等?,?明" (1994), 首?:?文?院
  11. 梨花女子大???文化?究院, "近代?蒙?期知??念的吸收和?化" (2005), 首?:邵明出版
  12. 延世大????究院, "西方文化的吸收?近代改革" (2004), 首?:太?社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)