본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

最近韩国儒学研究的主要动向

A Main Trend in the Recent Study of Korean Confucianism

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

中文提要:本论文主要整理并分析了2005 年11 月至2007 年10 月韩国学 界关于韩国儒学的研究成果。考察对象为成均馆大学儒教文化研究所儒教评价 委员会所选定的学术杂志上的论文。 最近两年韩国学界关于韩国儒学研究的特征如下: 第一,“韩流”研究新登舞台。研究“韩流”与儒学思想的论文出现表明 儒学者开始从哲学的角度关注时代的新文化现象。 第二,朝鲜后期思想的关注度明显增加。除了对退溪、栗谷等前期性理学 者的研究,以前研究不多的湖洛论争、心说论争等朝鲜后期的性理学研究逐渐 增加。 第三,实学思想中对李瀷(1681-1763)、丁若镛(1762-1836)以及崔汉绮 (1803-1877)三人的研究占了绝大部分,对医学者李济马(1837-1900)进行详 细研究的学者也开始出现。 由此可见,目前韩国学界正在以先前积累的研究成果为基础,积极探讨新 的文化现象和一度被忽略的历史人物。

Abstract

The essay is focused upon arranging and evaluating the important achievements of Confucianism which were studied from Nov. 2005 to Oct. 2007 in Korea. Our object of investigation was Korean theses established in authentic expert journals, which were selected by a committee of Confucian Study Evaluation in the Confucian Culture Institute of Sungkyunkwan University. In Korea, recently for two years, the important achievements of Confucianism have characteristics as follows: Firstly, the studies of "Korean Wave" are newly appearing, which are closely connected with the thought of Confucianism. Recently, Korean scholars are interested in the several aspects of Korean culture and more actively discuss them from the standpoint of Confucianism. Secondly, Korean scholars have their more interest in the Korean Confucianism of the later Yi dynasty. There is a relative increase on the studies of the Confucianism of the later Yi dynasty, such as the Controversy of Ho School and Lak School, the Controversy of Mind-doctrine, etc. Thirdly, the studies of such Korean scholars as Lee Ik, Jeong Yak-yong, Choi Hanki, etc. are predominant in the field of Korean Practical Science. From the point of view of Confucianism, especially, some scholars have the more precise study of Lee Je-ma who was the most famous doctor in Yi dynasty. Consequently, it is possible to say that, on the foundation of accumulated academic studies, recently, there are more precise studies about a new stream of Korea culture and about such scholars or schools as have been unactively studied before.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. "《哲》(哲)第90", ~
  2. "《洋哲??究》(洋哲??究)第38、44、45、48、50、51", ~
  3. "《儒?思想?究》(儒)第24、26、27、28、29", ~
  4. "《思想史》(思想史)第25、26、27、28", ~
  5. "《泛?哲》(泛?哲)第40、43", ~
  6. "《大?哲》(大?哲)第34、35、37", ~
  7. "《哲??究》(大?哲)第97、100、101", ~
  8. "《?西哲??究》(西哲)第37、42、43、44", ~
  9. "《洋》(檀?大??洋文化?究所)第136", ~
  10. "《洋社?思想》(洋社?思想)第15", ~
  11. "《版儒?文化?究》(成均?大?儒?文化?究)第6、7", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)