Xunzi, Dewey, and the Reinterpretation of Religion
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper compares the naturalistic interpretations of religion offered by the Chinese Confucian philosopher Xunzi (c. 310-219 BCE) and the American pragmatist philosopher John Dewey (1859-1952), and shows how each philosopher reconceived the nature of religious life in fundamentally non-supernatural, ethical, and therapeutic terms. While acknowledging that there are important differences between their respective views—especially on such matters as the nature and scope of ethical knowledge, the nature of ethics, and what form an ideal society will take—and that their views were furthermore shaped by very different historical and cultural contexts, the paper argues that both philosophers nevertheless took this naturalized, ethical and therapeutic conception of religion to be the correct and more profound way to understand religious life, and the best way to develop an appropriate sense of oneness with and reverence for the social and natural worlds that we inhabit. For both Xunzi and Dewey, in short, religious attitudes, experiences, and practices are valuable not because they put us into proper relations with something supernatural, but rather because of their capacity to orient and enrich our lives at both the individual and social levels and put us into proper relations with other human beings and the natural world. Overall, the paper argues that a comparative study of Xunzi’s and Dewey’s interpretations of religion not only reveals features of their thought that we might otherwise miss, but also helps us to better understand the range of possible forms that a naturalistic interpretation of religion can take.
Abstract
This paper compares the naturalistic interpretations of religion offered by the Chinese Confucian philosopher Xunzi (c. 310-219 BCE) and the American pragmatist philosopher John Dewey (1859-1952), and shows how each philosopher reconceived the nature of religious life in fundamentally non-supernatural, ethical, and therapeutic terms. While acknowledging that there are important differences between their respective views—especially on such matters as the nature and scope of ethical knowledge, the nature of ethics, and what form an ideal society will take—and that their views were furthermore shaped by very different historical and cultural contexts, the paper argues that both philosophers nevertheless took this naturalized, ethical and therapeutic conception of religion to be the correct and more profound way to understand religious life, and the best way to develop an appropriate sense of oneness with and reverence for the social and natural worlds that we inhabit. For both Xunzi and Dewey, in short, religious attitudes, experiences, and practices are valuable not because they put us into proper relations with something supernatural, but rather because of their capacity to orient and enrich our lives at both the individual and social levels and put us into proper relations with other human beings and the natural world. Overall, the paper argues that a comparative study of Xunzi’s and Dewey’s interpretations of religion not only reveals features of their thought that we might otherwise miss, but also helps us to better understand the range of possible forms that a naturalistic interpretation of religion can take.
참고문헌 (29)
- Berkson, Mark, "Xunzi’s Reinterpretation of Ritual: A Hermeneutic Defense of the Confucian Way", pp.107~132 (2014)
- Campany, Robert F., "Xunzi and Durkheim as Theorists of Ritual Practice", pp.197~231 (1992)
- Carr, Karen L., "The Sense of Antirationalism: The Religious Thought of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard" (2000), Seven Bridges Press
- Cline, Erin M. Cline, "Confucius, Rawls, and the Sense of Justice" (2013), Fordham University Press
- Cochran, Molly, "The Cambridge Companion to John Dewey" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Dewey, "The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy" (1981)
- Dewey, John, "From Absolutism to Experimentalism" (1981)
- Dewey, John, "The Development of American Pragmatism" (1981)
- Dewey, John, "A Common Faith" (1934), Yale University Press
- Durkheim, Emile, "The Elementary Forms of Religious Life", ~ (1912)
- Hagen, Kurtis, "The Philosophy of Xunzi: A Reconstruction" (2007), Open Court Publishing
- Hickman, Larry A., "Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a Postmodern Generation" (1998), Indiana University Press
- Hutton, Eric L., "Xunzi: The Complete Text" (2014), Princeton University Press
- Ivanhoe, Philip J., "Confucian Moral Self Cultivation" (2000), Hackett Publishing
- Ivanhoe, Philip J., "Heaven as a Source for Ethical Warrant in Early Confucianism", Dao, 6, pp.211~220 (2007)
- Ivanhoe, Philip J., "A Happy Symmetry: Xunzi’s Ecological Ethic", pp.43~60 (2014)
- Kline, T. C., "Religion and Ritual in the Xunzi" (2014), State University of New York Press
- McDermott, John J., "The Philosophy of John Dewey" (1981), University of Chicago Press
- Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., "Structure and Function in Primitive Society" (1965), Free Press
- Reynolds, Frank, "Discourse and Practice" (1992), State University of New York Press
- Robson, James, "Ritual and Tradition in Xunzi and Dogen", pp.135~157 (2014)
- Rockefeller, Steven C., "Dewey’s Philosophy of Religious Experience", pp.124~148 (1998)
- Slater, Michael R., "Two Rival Interpretations of Xunzi’s Views on the Basis of Morality", Journal of Religious Ethics, 45(2), pp.363~379 (2017)
- Slater, Michael R., "Xunzi on Heaven, Ritual, and the Way", Philosophy East and West, 68(3), pp.887~908 (2018)
- Stalnaker, Aaron, "Overcoming Our Evil: Human Nature and Spiritual Exercises in Xunzi and Augustine" (2006), Georgetown University Press
- Van Norden, Bryan W., "Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Van Norden, Bryan W., "Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto" (2017), Columbia University Press
- Westbrook, Robert, "The Making of a Democratic Philosopher: The Intellectual Development of John Dewey", pp.13~33 (2010)
- Yearley, Lee, "Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage" (1990), State University of New York Press