인센티브 지급 방식이 성과와 부정행위에 미치는 효과 연구
A Study on the Impact of Incentive Payment Method on Cheating and Performance
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 논문은 인센티브 지급 유형에 따라 성과와 부정행위 간의 관계를 분석하고 있다. 또한 부정행위가 단순히 개인이 도덕적이지 못해서 이루어지는 것인지 아니면 인센티브라는 제도가 사람이 부정행위를 저지르게 만드는지를 분석하였다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 현장실험 방법을 이용하였다. 설문조사 실험에 참여한 실험참가자들을 인센티브 유형별 네 그룹으로 나누고 이 그룹별로 시간의 흐름에따라 성과와 부정행위 그리고 개인의 노력정도가 어떻게 변하고 있는지를 분석하였다. 분석방법은 ANOVA, 포아송 회귀식을 횡단면과 패널 분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과 인센티브강도가 클수록 부정행위는 증가하였으며 인센티브가 개인의성과와 부정행위에 단조적으로 영향을 미치고 있었다.
Abstract
This paper analyzes the interaction between the cheating and performance depending on the type of incentive payments. We analyzed whether cheating was occurred by immoral people or whether social system like incentive made people commit cheating. In this study, We used a field experiment method. Were divided into four groups of incentive type of experiment participants(or subjects) who took part in the experiment for questionnaire study and analyzed how is changing the degree of their effort, personal misconduct and achievements along the flow of time by the group. The analytical method for this article was carried out in the panel -including random effect and fixed effect- and cross-sectional analysis, ANOVA and the Poisson regression. we can find that the more incentive strength is large, the more cheating is increased. Finally, we also investigated incentive affect monotonically to cheating and achievements of the individual.
참고문헌 (17)
- 고수일, "내재적 동기에 대한 성과 - 보상 연계성과 경쟁, 피드백 결과의 효과", 경영학연구, 31(2), pp.10~528 (2002), 한국경영학회
- 김세움, "고용주와 근로자 간의 선물교환: 현장실험을 통한 분석", 경제학연구, 60(3), pp.93~125 (2012), 한국경제학회
- Anderhub, V., "Efficient Contracting and Fair Play in a Simple Principal-Agent Experiment", Experimental Economics, 5(1), pp.5~27 (2002)
- Brian A.J., "Rotten Apples: An Investigation of The Prevalence And Predictors of Teacher Cheating", Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp.843~876 (2003)
- Camerer, C.F., "The Effect of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-labor Production Framework", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, pp.7~42 (1999)
- Christina, G., "How Luck and Performance affect Stealing", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (2013)
- Christiane, S., "Does Competition Enhance Performance or Cheating? A Laboratory Experiment", Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, pp.241~253 (2010)
- Conrads, J., "Lying and Team Incentives", Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, pp.1~7 (2013)
- Fehr, E., "When Social Norms Overpower Competition: Gift Exchange in Epxerimental Labor Markets", Journal of Labor Economics, 16, pp.324~351 (1998)
- Fehr, E., "Fairness and Contract Design", Econometrica, 75, pp.121~154 (1997)
- Enhancing the Efficacy of Teacher Incentives Through Loss Aversion: A Field Experiment, "Fryer, Jr. R.G.", ~, pp.Working Paper No. 18237 (2012)
- Gneezy, U., "Pay Enough, or Don’T Pay At All", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), pp.791~810 (2000)
- Gneezy, U., "Performance In Competitive Environments: Gender Differences", Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp.1049~1073 (2003)
- Harrison, G., "Field Experiments", Journal of Economic Literature, 152, pp.1009~1055 (2004)
- Nalbantian, H., "Productivity under Group Incentives: An Experimental Study", American Economic Review, 87(3), pp.314~341 (1997)
- Pascual-Ezama, D., "Motivation, Money, Prestige and Cheats", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2013)
- Raymond, A. N., "Wright, Human Resource Management-gaining a Competitive Advantage" (2008), McGraw-Hill