치매 진단의 정확성을 높이기 위한 치매 종류별 특성의 비교 연구
A Comparative Study of Forms of Dementia’s Characteristic to Improve Accuracy of Diagnosis of Dementia
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As the aging of the population accelerates worldwide, dementia, a socially costly senile disease, is becoming a social problem. Dementia must be diagnosed correctly because dementia’s early detection is important. Thus in this study, 20 subgroups were analyzed based on the results of dementia diagnosis using the Korea Veterans Hospital's diagnosis information. We analyzed difference in proportions of gender, age, dementia’s diagnostic tests. There were 12(high risk group-dementia-vascular dementia), 15(low risk group-normal-alzheimer's disease), 16(low risk group-suspected dementia-alzheimer's disease), 20(low risk group-dementia-alzheimer's disease) subgroups with unusual patterns in the analysis of gender. As the result of analysis of age, 1(high risk group-normal-normal), 7(high risk group-high risk group of dementia-degenerative dementia), 10(high risk group-dementia-dementia), 15(low risk group-normal-alzheimer's disease), 19(low risk group-dementia-vascular dementia) subgroups showed unique appearance. There were 4(high risk group-MCI-MCI), 6(high risk group-suspected dementia-alzheimer's disease), 7(high risk group-high risk group of dementia-degenerative dementia), 10(high risk group-dementia-dementia) subgroups with unusual patterns in the analysis of second stage’s diagnostic test and 4(high risk group-MCI-MCI), 5(high risk group-suspected dementia-dementia), 6(high risk group-suspected dementia-alzheimer's disease), 7(high risk group-high risk group of dementia-degenerative dementia), 10(high risk group-dementia-dementia) subgroups with unusual patterns in the analysis of third stage’s diagnostic test. This study suggested a way to compare the characteristics of patients according to the type of dementia, and the analysis is meaningful in that it identifies subgroups that are characteristic. It is necessary to conduct the test effectively by utilizing the data of the existing examinee's characteristics such as the data presented in this study.
Abstract
As the aging of the population accelerates worldwide, dementia, a socially costly senile disease, is becoming a social problem. Dementia must be diagnosed correctly because dementia’s early detection is important. Thus in this study, 20 subgroups were analyzed based on the results of dementia diagnosis using the Korea Veterans Hospital's diagnosis information. We analyzed difference in proportions of gender, age, dementia’s diagnostic tests. There were 12(high risk group-dementia-vascular dementia), 15(low risk group-normal-alzheimer's disease), 16(low risk group-suspected dementia-alzheimer's disease), 20(low risk group-dementia-alzheimer's disease) subgroups with unusual patterns in the analysis of gender. As the result of analysis of age, 1(high risk group-normal-normal), 7(high risk group-high risk group of dementia-degenerative dementia), 10(high risk group-dementia-dementia), 15(low risk group-normal-alzheimer's disease), 19(low risk group-dementia-vascular dementia) subgroups showed unique appearance. There were 4(high risk group-MCI-MCI), 6(high risk group-suspected dementia-alzheimer's disease), 7(high risk group-high risk group of dementia-degenerative dementia), 10(high risk group-dementia-dementia) subgroups with unusual patterns in the analysis of second stage’s diagnostic test and 4(high risk group-MCI-MCI), 5(high risk group-suspected dementia-dementia), 6(high risk group-suspected dementia-alzheimer's disease), 7(high risk group-high risk group of dementia-degenerative dementia), 10(high risk group-dementia-dementia) subgroups with unusual patterns in the analysis of third stage’s diagnostic test. This study suggested a way to compare the characteristics of patients according to the type of dementia, and the analysis is meaningful in that it identifies subgroups that are characteristic. It is necessary to conduct the test effectively by utilizing the data of the existing examinee's characteristics such as the data presented in this study.
참고문헌 (19)
- 강연욱, "서울신경심리검사(SNSB)" (2003), 휴브알엔씨
- 박명화, "경도인지장애노인과 정상노인의 인구학적 특성, 동반질환 및 건강습관 비교", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 44(4), pp.351~360 (2014), 한국간호과학회
- 박용순, "국내 의료기관 암 검진 프로그램의 근거 중심 평가", Korean Journal of Health Promotion, 9(2), pp.86~96 (2009), 대한임상건강증진학회
- 양희진, "국내 일부 3차 의료기관에서 실시하는 종합검진의 검사항목에 관한 근거 조사", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 27(9), pp.723~732 (2006), 대한가정의학회
- 오병훈, "치매의 조기발견 및 위험인자관리", 대한임상노인의학회 추계학술대회 (2008)
- 이윤희, "한국 치매노인 가족의 삶의 질 향상을 위한 주거환경 연구", 박사, 주거환경학, pp.2004
- 중앙치매센터, "대한민국 치매현황 2018", 보건복지부 중앙치매센터, ~ (2018)
- 중앙치매센터, "치매 소양심화공통교육 교재" (2018), 보건복지부 중앙치매센터
- 최성혜, "한국판 Expanded Clinical Dementia Rating 척도의 타당도", 대한신경과학회지, 19(6), pp.585~591 (2001)
- World Alzheimer Report 2018, "Alzheimer's Disease International", ~ (2018)
- Kaszniak A. W., "Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders" (1986), Oxford University Press
- Katz S., "Illness in the Aged", JAMA, 185(12), pp.914~919 (1963)
- Meyer J., "Longitudinal analysis of abnormal domains comprising mild cognitive impairment(MCI) during aging", Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 201, pp.19~25 (2002)
- Morris J. C., "The Clinical Dementia Rating: current version and scoring rules", Neurology, 43, pp.2412~2414 (1993)
- OECD, "Health at a Glance", ~ (2017)
- Petersen R. C., "Mild cognitive impairment : clinical characterization and outcome", Archives of neurology, 56(3), pp.303~308 (1999)
- Petersen R. C., "Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment", Archives of neurology, 58(12), pp.1985~1992 (2001)
- Rabins P. V., "The impact of dementia on the family", JAMA, 248(3), pp.333~335 (1982)
- Reisberg B., "The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia", AM J Psychiatry, 139, pp.1136~1139 (1982)