Uniforms or Distracting Skirts in Public Schools: The Long & Short of It
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In 2012 the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education announced that it had adopted a controversial human rights ordinance that, among its other provisions, loosens up traditionally prevalent school uniform requirements by allowing students freedom to choose their own clothing styles. This article focuses on the comparative law of the United States to address whether schools may adopt dress codes or mandate school uniforms without violating the rights of students to self expression. Part II delineates the recent impetus for the proliferation of dress codes and school uniform policies in American public schools. Part III briefly outlines the foundations of constitutionally protected speech in that nation. Part IV presents the U.S. Supreme Court rulings that frame the First Amendment rights of students. Part V introduces a distinct constitutional framework that is emerging in a number of federal circuit courts, which framework is supportive of the authority of American school officials to adopt content-neutral dress codes and school uniform requirements. Part VI is an overview of the free speech rights of Students in Korea. While the distinction between speech in schools and outside of schools is less significant in Korean law, in the United States, minors are generally afforded the presumption of constitutional protection as “persons.” However, their rights to protected speech are not coextensive with the rights of adults outside of the school setting. The nature of the First Amendment rights of students in American elementary, middle and high schools is what is appropriate for “children in school.” School official are not obliged by the U.S. Constitution to surrender control of schools to public school students, and the degree of freedom that students enjoy must be weighed against the responsibility of teachers to manage schoolwork and to keep the learning environment free from undue disruption. In the United States school dress codes and mandatory school uniform requirements are generally considered content-neutral regulations of expressive conduct. A number of federal Circuit Courts have ruled that such school policies survive intermediate scrutiny in that they further important government interests such as promoting safety, focusing student attention on academics, eliminating dress differences that emphasize income disparity, and simplifying daily school preparation; that such governmental interests are unrelated to the suppression of student expression; and that any resulting incidental restrictions on First Amendment activities are no more than is necessary to facilitate the governmental interests. While some dress codes have been successfully challenged primarily for being vague and thus arbitrary, school uniforms have been highly successful and have survived legal challenges in the United States.
Abstract
In 2012 the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education announced that it had adopted a controversial human rights ordinance that, among its other provisions, loosens up traditionally prevalent school uniform requirements by allowing students freedom to choose their own clothing styles. This article focuses on the comparative law of the United States to address whether schools may adopt dress codes or mandate school uniforms without violating the rights of students to self expression. Part II delineates the recent impetus for the proliferation of dress codes and school uniform policies in American public schools. Part III briefly outlines the foundations of constitutionally protected speech in that nation. Part IV presents the U.S. Supreme Court rulings that frame the First Amendment rights of students. Part V introduces a distinct constitutional framework that is emerging in a number of federal circuit courts, which framework is supportive of the authority of American school officials to adopt content-neutral dress codes and school uniform requirements. Part VI is an overview of the free speech rights of Students in Korea. While the distinction between speech in schools and outside of schools is less significant in Korean law, in the United States, minors are generally afforded the presumption of constitutional protection as “persons.” However, their rights to protected speech are not coextensive with the rights of adults outside of the school setting. The nature of the First Amendment rights of students in American elementary, middle and high schools is what is appropriate for “children in school.” School official are not obliged by the U.S. Constitution to surrender control of schools to public school students, and the degree of freedom that students enjoy must be weighed against the responsibility of teachers to manage schoolwork and to keep the learning environment free from undue disruption. In the United States school dress codes and mandatory school uniform requirements are generally considered content-neutral regulations of expressive conduct. A number of federal Circuit Courts have ruled that such school policies survive intermediate scrutiny in that they further important government interests such as promoting safety, focusing student attention on academics, eliminating dress differences that emphasize income disparity, and simplifying daily school preparation; that such governmental interests are unrelated to the suppression of student expression; and that any resulting incidental restrictions on First Amendment activities are no more than is necessary to facilitate the governmental interests. While some dress codes have been successfully challenged primarily for being vague and thus arbitrary, school uniforms have been highly successful and have survived legal challenges in the United States.
참고문헌 (27)
- Alyson Ray, "A Nation of Robots?: The Unconstitutionality of Public School Uniform Codes", J. Marshall L. Rev, 28, pp.645~ (1995)
- Amy Mitchell Wilson, "Public School Dress Codes: The Constitutional Debate", BYU Educ. & L.J., 1998, pp.147~ (1998)
- Bill Maxwell, "Uniforms Can Help Teachers and Students", TAMPA BAY TIMES (2010)
- "Bills Enrollment at Christian Schools is Growing Dramatically", The Morning Call, ~ (1996)
- "Chatterjee, Camille, Uniform Improvements", PSYCHOLOGY TODAY 14, ~ (1999)
- Constitutional Court of Korea, "TWENTY YEARS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF KOREA", pp.476~ (2008)
- Dena M. Sarke, "Coed Naked Constitutional Law: The Benefits and Harms of Uniform Dress Requirements in American Public Schools", B. U. L. Rev, 78, pp.153~ (1998)
- Elizabeth T. Gershoff, "More Harm Than Good: A Summary of Scientific Research on the Intended and Unintended Effects of Corporal Punishment on Children", Law & Contemp. Probs, 73, pp.31~ (2010)
- "Harvard Study Shows Fewer Drop Out Here", Long Beach Unified School District News, ~ (2001)
- Hui Keung, "How Do Clothes Affect the Classroom", RALEIGH NEWS AND OBSERVER, ~ (1999)
- Jaewan Moon, "Obscenity Laws in a Paternalistic Country: The Korean Experience", Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev, 2, pp.353~ (2003)
- James A. Maoney, "Constitutional Problems Surrounding the Implementation of “Anti‐gang” Regulations in the Public Schools", Marq. L. Rev, 75, pp.1~ (1991)
- James Yoo, "Dress Codes a Topic with No Uniform View", NEW JERSEY RECORD, ~ (2009)
- Jim McConville, "In NJ Schools, dress codes and Uniforms" (2011), ASBURY PARK PRESS
- Joseph P. Ferry, "Despite Dress Codes", Strict Discipline and Tuition
- Rob Killen, "The Achilles' Heel of Dress Codes: The Definition of Proper Attire in Public Schools", TULSA L. J., 36, pp.459~ (2000)
- 표시열, "한국 학교에서 아동권리협약의 적용과 과제 : 체벌 · 징계절차 · 표현의 자유를 중심으로", 교육법학연구, 20(2), pp.151~172 (2008), 대한교육법학회
- Todd A. DeMitchell, "School Uniforms and the Constitution: Common Dress in an Uncommon Time", Educ. L. Rep, 156, pp.1~ (2001)
- Todd A. DeMitchell, "School Uniforms in the Public Schools: Symbol or Substance? A Law & Policy Analysis", West's Educ. L. Rep, 250, pp.847~ (2010)
- Todd A. DeMitchell, "Dress Codes in the Public Schools: Principals, Policies, and Precepts", J.L. & Educ, 29, pp.31~ (2000)
- Troy Y. Nelson, "If Clothes Make the Person, Do Uniforms Make the Student? Constitutional Free Speech Rights and Student Uniforms", Ed. Law Rep, 118, pp.1~ (1997)
- William Jefferson Clinton, "Former U.S. President, Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union", Public Papers, 1, pp.79~ (1996)
- William Jefferson Clinton, "Former U.S. President, Executive Memorandum, Memorandum for the Secretary of Education: Manual on School Uniforms", ~ (1996)
- Woo‐Young Lee, "More Teachers Insulted by Students, Parents, Teachers’ Group Attributes Violations to Ordinance for Greater Student Rights", THE KOREA HEARLD, ~ (2012)
- "Seoul Education Office to Proclaim Controversial Student Rights Ordinance", Korea Times, ~ (2012)
- U.S. Department of Education, "Indicators of School Crime and Safety", ~ (2010)
- U.S. Department of Education, "School Uniforms: Where They Are and Why They Work" (1996), U.S. DEP’T OF EDUC