한국 법제에 대한 고찰
A Study on the Korean Legislation
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article deals with the legislation since the establishment of the Korean government. The Korean Legislation is reviewed in respect of the law-making procedure, the law system, the contends of laws, legal terms & legal phraseology and the characteristic of legislation. Legislation is regarded as one of the three main power of government, which are often distinguished under the doctrine of the separation of powers. The legislative branch of government has the power to create legislation; the judicial branch of government has the power to interpret legislation; the executive branch of government acts only within the powers and limits set by the law. According to the Korean Constitution bills should be proposed by members of the National Assembly or by the executive. Once introduced, a bill must go through a number of stages before it can become law. A bill should be debated in detail and agreed in the standing committee of the National Assembly as well as in the plenary session of the National Assembly. The Constitution, the National Assembly Act and the Rule of National Assembly Procedure regulate the legislative process and the legislator should keep the rules. In cases of the competence disputes between chairman of the National Assembly and its members, the Constitutional Court decided that the power to deliberate and vote on bills of the assembly members was infringed, but the bills were not invalid. The legislator should respect the rules of the legislative process. The number of legislation is increase very rapidly and the legislation is lack of the systematic structure. It is very recommended that the acts should be codified systematically. The legal terms & legal phraseology should be clear and plain in order to be interpreted, executed and kept by the authorities and by the people more easily and clearly.
Abstract
This article deals with the legislation since the establishment of the Korean government. The Korean Legislation is reviewed in respect of the law-making procedure, the law system, the contends of laws, legal terms & legal phraseology and the characteristic of legislation. Legislation is regarded as one of the three main power of government, which are often distinguished under the doctrine of the separation of powers. The legislative branch of government has the power to create legislation; the judicial branch of government has the power to interpret legislation; the executive branch of government acts only within the powers and limits set by the law. According to the Korean Constitution bills should be proposed by members of the National Assembly or by the executive. Once introduced, a bill must go through a number of stages before it can become law. A bill should be debated in detail and agreed in the standing committee of the National Assembly as well as in the plenary session of the National Assembly. The Constitution, the National Assembly Act and the Rule of National Assembly Procedure regulate the legislative process and the legislator should keep the rules. In cases of the competence disputes between chairman of the National Assembly and its members, the Constitutional Court decided that the power to deliberate and vote on bills of the assembly members was infringed, but the bills were not invalid. The legislator should respect the rules of the legislative process. The number of legislation is increase very rapidly and the legislation is lack of the systematic structure. It is very recommended that the acts should be codified systematically. The legal terms & legal phraseology should be clear and plain in order to be interpreted, executed and kept by the authorities and by the people more easily and clearly.
참고문헌 (36)
- 국회사무처, "정리되어야 할 사문화 법률" (2005)
- 국회사무처 법제실, "입법이론과 법제실무" (2008)
- 김재광, "입법과정의 선진화와 효율성 제고에 관한 연구" (2008), 법제처
- 정종섭, "헌법학원론 제6판" (2011), 박영사
- 박수철, "입법총론" (2011), 한울
- 박영도, "입법학용어해설집" (2002), 한국법제연구원
- 박영도, "입법학 입문" (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 법제처, "대한민국 법제 50년사(상)(하)" (1999)
- 법제처, "알기 쉬운 법령정비기준 제3판" (2009)
- 법제처, "법령입안 심사기준", ~ (2006)
- 석인선, "국회의 입법형성권과 헌법재판소의 사법심사권의 관계" (2003), 한국공법학회
- 성낙인, "헌법학 제9판" (2009), 법문사
- 장영수, "헌법학" (2007), 홍문사
- 전광석, "한국헌법론 제7판" (2011), 집현재
- 정만희, "헌법과 통치구조" (2003), 법문사
- 정종섭, "헌법학원론 제6판" (2011), 박영사
- 정호영, "국회법론" (2004), 법문사
- 전광석, "한국헌법론, 제6판" (2010), 법문사
- 홍완식, "사회적 쟁점과 법적 접근 제3판" (2011), 건국대학교 출판부
- 김상용, "민사법제의 쟁점과 전망", 법제연구, (34), pp.43~84 (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 박경철, "입법절차의 위법과 법률안가결선포행위의 효력 ― 헌재 2009. 10. 29. 선고, 2009헌라8ㆍ9ㆍ10(병합)결정에 대한 헌법적 검토 ―", 공법연구, 38(2), pp.285~319 (2009), 한국공법학회
- 박관용, "국회입법 60년의 회고와 전망", 입법학연구, 5 (2008), 한국입법학회
- 박균성, "정부입법 60년의 평가와 과제", 입법학연구, 5 (2008), 한국입법학회
- 박영도, "최근의 입법 경향과 입법의 선진화를 위한 과제", 동아법학, (50), pp.67~97 (2011), 법학연구소
- 방승주, "위헌입법의 현황과 대책", 저스티스, (106), pp.254~292 (2008), 한국법학원
- 신상환, "독일의 입법과정상 입법평가적용의 구체적 사례분석 및 조망을 통하여 본 한국입법평가의 발전과제", 법제, 통권 : 540 (2002)
- 윤장근, "미국연방정부의 규칙제정에 있어서 Plain Language 사용에 관한 연구", 입법학연구, 3 (2006), 한국입법학회
- 이진국, "형사법제의 쟁점과 전망", 법제연구, (34), pp.85~110 (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 이희성, "노동법제의 쟁점과 전망", 법제연구, (35), pp.135~175 (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 임종훈, "헌법재판소와 입법부와의 관계, In: 헌법재판의 회고와 전망" (1998), 헌법재판소
- 정종섭, "위헌입법의 현황과 대책 토론문", 저스티스, (106) (2008), 한국법학원
- 최준선, "상사법제의 쟁점과 전망", 법제연구, (35), pp.47~77 (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 홍완식, "입법자의 법률개선의무에 관한 연구― 독일 연방헌법재판소와 한국 헌법재판소의 결정례를 중심으로 ―", 공법연구, 31(2), pp.12~12 (2002), 한국공법학회
- 홍완식, "체계정당성의 원리에 관한 연구", 토지공법연구, 29, pp.459~482 (2005), 한국토지공법학회
- 홍완식, "헌법재판소의 결정을 통해 본 입법의 원칙", 헌법학연구, 15(4), pp.487~520 (2009), 한국헌법학회
- 홍완식, "헌법재판소에 의한 입법절차 통제", 공법학연구, 12(2), pp.249~271 (2011), 한국비교공법학회
